Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite In Re Kurowski, 20 A.3d 306.

70 citing documents.

In the Matter of Donald Nixon and Roxanne Nixon N.H. 2025
In the Matter of Kurowski & Kurowski, 161 N.H. 578, 585 (2011).
In the Matter of David Campbell and Robin Partello N.H. 2025
In the Matter of Kurowski & Kurowski, 161 N.H. 578, 588 (2011).
In the Matter of Jennifer Milliken and Craig Milliken N.H. 2024
In the Matter of White & White, 170 N.H. 619, 620 (2018) (regarding child support); In the Matter of Kurowski & Kurowski, 161 N.H. 578, 585 (2011) (regarding parenting plans).
Nancy Haskell v. Elizabeth Millett & a. N.H. 2024
In the Matter of Kurowski & Kurowski, 161 N.H. 578, 585 (2011).
In the Matter of Mark Foley and Kasey Woodman N.H. 2024
In the Matter of Kurowski & Kurowski, 161 N.H. 578, 585 (2011).
In the Matter of Michael Boisvert and Nicole Lariviere N.H. 2024
In the Matter of Kurowski & Kurowski, 161 N.H. 578, 585 (2011).
In the Matter of Alan Perewitz and Suzanne Perewitz N.H. 2024
In the Matter of Kurowski & Kurowski, 161 N.H. 578, 585 (2011).
In the Matter of Kseniya Ausiaikova and Brian Meckel N.H. 2024
The trial court is afforded wide discretion in determining matters of parental rights and responsibilities; accordingly, when reviewing such decisions, “our role is limited to determining whether it clearly appears that the trial court engaged in an unsustainable exercise of discretion.” In the Matter of Kurowski & Kurowski, 161 N.H. 578, 585 (2011); see also In the Matter of Ndyaija & Ndyaija, 173 N.H. 127, 140 (2020).
In the Matter of Amanda Picardi and William Picardi N.H. 2024
id.; In the Matter of Spenard & Spenard, 167 N.H. 1, 3 (2014); In the Matter of Kurowski & Kurowski, 161 N.H. 578, 585 (2011).
In the Matter of Jonathan Merrill and Lea Merrill N.H. 2024
In the Matter of Kurowski & Kurowski, 161 N.H. 578, 585 (2011).
In the Matter of James Anderson, Jr. and Jennifer Tveter N.H. 2024
The trial court is afforded wide discretion in determining matters of parental rights and responsibilities and child support; accordingly, when reviewing such decisions, “our role is limited to determining whether it clearly appears that the trial court engaged in an unsustainable exercise of discretion.” In the Matter of Kurowski & Kurowski, 161 N.H. 578, 585 (2011); see also In the Matter of Ndyaija & Ndyaija, 173 N.H. 127, 140 (2020).
In the Matter of Nicole McCormack Parker and Roy Parker N.H. 2024
Id.; In the Matter of Kurowski & Kurowski, 161 N.H. 578, 585 (2011).
C.W. v. J.G. N.H. 2024
In the Matter of Kurowski & Kurowski, 161 N.H. 578, 585 (2011).
L.A. v. Z.A. N.H. 2024
In the Matter of Kurowski & Kurowski, 161 N.H. 578, 585 (2011).
In the Matter of Andrew Cullen and Jacqueline Cullen N.H. 2024
In the Matter of Kurowski & Kurowski, 161 N.H. 578, 585 (2011).
In the Matter of Marc Hebert and Kelly Hebert N.H. 2024
In the Matter of Kurowski & Kurowski, 161 N.H. 578, 585 (2011).
In the Matter of Amy Froebel-Fisher and Richard Fisher N.H. 2023
In the Matter of Kurowski & Kurowski, 161 N.H. 578, 585 (2011).
In the Matter of Noreen Morgan and Thomas Morgan N.H. 2023
In the Matter of Kurowski & Kurowski, 161 N.H. 578, 585 (2011).
In the Matter of Samantha Curran and James Curran, Jr. N.H. 2023
In the Matter of Kurowski & Kurowski, 161 N.H. 578, 585 (2011).
S.A. v. J.C. N.H. 2023
In the Matter of Kurowski & Kurowski, 161 N.H. 578, 585 (2011).
In the Matter of Dana Albrecht and Katherine Albrecht N.H. 2023
In the Matter of Kurowski & Kurowski, 161 N.H. 578, 585 (2011).
K.G. v. A.G. N.H. 2023
In the Matter of Kurowski & Kurowski, 161 N.H. 578, 585 (2011).
In the Matter of Joy Gagnon and Gary Gagnon N.H. 2023
In the Matter of Kurowski & Kurowski, 161 N.H. 578, 585 (2011).
In the Matter of Jodi Monroe and Matthew MacDonald N.H. 2023
In the Matter of Kurowski & Kurowski, 161 N.H. 578, 585 (2011).
C.B. v. A.K. N.H. 2023
In the Matter of Kurowski & Kurowski, 161 N.H. 578, 585 (2011).
In re Name Change of Claire Bergeron N.H. 2022
However, “[t]he trial court’s discretion necessarily extends to matters such as assigning weight to evidence and assessing the credibility and demeanor of witnesses.” In the Matter of Kurowski & Kurowski, 161 N.H. 578, 585 (2011).
In the Matter of George McAlpin and Susan McAlpin N.H. 2022
In the Matter of Kurowski & Kurowski, 161 N.H. 578, 585 (2011).
In the Matter of Michelle McKinnon and James McKinnon N.H. 2022
In the Matter of Kurowski & Kurowski, 161 N.H. 578, 585 (2011).
In the Matter of Barbara Bowman and Dennis Rooney N.H. 2022
In the Matter of Kurowski & Kurowski, 161 N.H. 578, 585 (2011).
In the Matter of Kerryn Hullstrung and Chris Moulton, Jr. N.H. 2022
“The trial court’s discretion necessarily extends to matters such as assigning weight to evidence and assessing the credibility and demeanor of witnesses.” In the Matter of Kurowski & Kurowski, 161 N.H. 578, 585 (2011).
In the Matter of Matthew Routhier and Kelly Routhier N.H. 2022
In the Matter of Kurowski & Kurowski, 161 N.H. 578, 585-88 (2011).
In the Matter of Jennifer Juri and Michael Juri N.H. 2021
Accordingly, “[w]hen reviewing a trial court’s decision on parenting rights and responsibilities, our role is limited to determining whether it clearly appears that the trial court engaged in an unsustainable exercise of discretion.” In the Matter of Kurowski & Kurowski, 161 N.H. 578, 585 (2011).
In the Matter of David Bournival and Eileen Bournival N.H. 2021
In the Matter of Kurowski & Kurowski, 161 N.H. 578, 585 (2011).
In the Matter of Eric Robinson and Rhonda Robinson N.H. 2021
In the Matter of Kurowski & Kurowski, 161 N.H. 578, 585 (2011).
In the Matter of Daniel Lovejoy and Brittany Lovejoy N.H. 2021
“When reviewing a trial court’s decision on parenting rights and responsibilities, our role is limited to determining whether it clearly appears that the trial court engaged in an unsustainable exercise of discretion.” In the Matter of Kurowski & Kurowski, 161 N.H. 578, 585 (2011).
In the Matter of Elizabeth Bannon and Richard Bannon N.H. 2020
“We consider only whether the record establishes an objective basis sufficient to sustain the discretionary judgment made, and we will not disturb the trial 2 court’s determination if it could reasonably have been made.” In the Matter of Kurowski & Kurowski, 161 N.H. 578, 585 (2011) (quotation omitted).
In the Matter of Andrew Cullen and Jacqueline Cullen N.H. 2020
“When reviewing a trial court’s decision on parenting rights and responsibilities, our role is limited to determining whether it clearly appears that the trial court engaged in an unsustainable exercise of discretion.” In the Matter of Kurowski & Kurowski, 161 N.H. 578, 585 (2011).
In the Matter of David Connelly and Kimberly Kivela N.H. 2020
RSA 461-A:6, VII (Supp. 2019) (requiring trial court, “[a]t the request of an aggrieved party,” to “set forth the reasons for its decision in a written order” (Emphasis added.)); cf. In the Matter of Kurowski & Kurowski, 161 N.H. 578, 598-99 (2011) (observing that the factors considered by the trial court in resolving a parenting dispute were consistent with the factors set forth in RSA 461-A:6, I).
In the Matter of Jennifer Marino and John Marino, III N.H. 2020
“When reviewing a trial court’s decision on parenting rights and responsibilities, our role is limited to determining whether it clearly appears that the trial court engaged in an unsustainable exercise of discretion.” In the Matter of Kurowski & Kurowski, 161 N.H. 578, 585 (2011).
In the Matter of Sean Braunstein and Jericka Braunstein N.H. 2020
In the Matter of Kurowski & Kurowski, 161 N.H. 578, 585 (2011).
In the Matter of Christina Pangelinan and Jeffrey Nelson N.H. 2020
In the Matter of Kurowski & Kurowski, 161 N.H. 578, 589-90 (2011).
In the Matter of Alfred Charest, III and Barbara Charest N.H. 2020
In the Matter of Kurowski & Kurowski, 161 N.H. 578, 585 (2011).
In the Matter of Brian Balch and Karen Balch N.H. 2019
In the Matter of Kurowski & Kurowski, 161 N.H. 578, 585 (2011).
In the Matter of Daniela Gamboa Soriano and Benjamin Ross N.H. 2019
In the Matter of Kurowski & Kurowski, 161 N.H. 578, 585 (2011).
Boat Works Condominium Association v. Evelyn Sanborn & a. N.H. 2019
In the Matter of Kurowski & Kurowski, 161 N.H. 578, 591 (2011).
In the Matter of Steven Summers and Christine Summers N.H. 2019
In the Matter of Kurowski & Kurowski, 161 N.H. 578, 585 (2011).
Cambridge Mutual Fire Insurance Company v. Mark Acciard N.H. 2019
In the Matter of Kurowski & Kurowski, 161 N.H. 578, 591 (2011) (stating that error affects substantial rights when it affected outcome of proceeding).
In the Matter of Alexis Neff and Jonathan Shields N.H. 2019
In the Matter of Kurowski & Kurowski, 161 N.H. 578, 585 (2011); RSA 461-A:2, I(d) (2018) (stating that purposes of RSA chapter 461-A include “[g]rant[ing].
In the Matter of Kristie Tetreault and Paul Tetreault N.H. 2019
“We consider only whether the record establishes an objective basis sufficient to sustain the discretionary judgment made, and we will not disturb the trial court’s determination if it could reasonably have been made.” In the Matter of Kurowski & Kurowski, 161 N.H. 578, 585 (2011) (quotation omitted).
In the Matter of Gina Bundza and Brian Bundza N.H. 2019
In the Matter of Kurowski & Kurowski, 161 N.H. 578, 585 (2011).

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by