Live · New Hampshire
New Hampshire
Free, searchable New Hampshire case law — no account, no paywall.
Opinions of the Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1843–present. A public-records project.
- Free & open Every opinion, free to read and search. No account, no paywall, no charge per search.
- Private by design We never store your searches — there is no research history to subpoena, sell, or leak.
- The court's own words Holdings and quotes come straight from the opinion, verbatim. We never paraphrase or generate legal text.
- 20,700 opinions indexed
- 37 judges (5 currently seated)
- 1843–2026 date range
- 17 legal topics to browse
Most recent activity
All opinions →| Docket | Court | Filed | Disposition | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-0497 | N.H. | 2026-11-04 | Reversed | State v. Cherbonneau |
| 2025-0543 | N.H. | 2026-10-28 | Affirmed and remanded | State v. Coffin |
| 2024-0722 | N.H. | 2026-10-28 | Affirmed | Appeal of Win Win Win, LLC |
| 2025-0655 | N.H. | 2026-10-22 | Vacated and remanded | In re X.M. |
| 2025-0167 | N.H. | 2026-10-22 | Reversed and remanded | State v. Hefferon |
What you can do here
- Search by keyword or by concept. Full-text search across every opinion, plus semantic search that finds cases by idea, not just matching words.
- Jump straight to a citation. Paste a reporter or docket citation and go directly to the opinion.
- See how a case has been treated. For any opinion, see which later cases cite it — and whether they followed, distinguished, or overruled it.
- Read the holding in the court's own words. The operative holding, quoted verbatim and linked to the paragraph it came from.
- Study the bench. Per-judge dossiers with voting record, dissent rate, and frequent co-panelists.
Opinions
Search and filter all 20,700 opinions in the corpus — by keyword, concept, outcome, and court.
Judges
5 currently-seated justices + judges, with per-judge dossiers covering opinion history, court split, dissent rate, and co-panelists.
Tags
Browse the 17 editorial subject-matter tags applied to New Hampshire opinions so far — controlled-vocabulary topics across doctrine, subject, procedural, and posture.
About this corpus
DocketDrift New Hampshire collates published opinions from the New Hampshire appellate courts, normalizes them into a structured archive, and surfaces patterns for human review. Source material is in the public record; our role is collation, not interpretation.
Each opinion shows whether it has been reviewed by an editor (cyan dot) or only machine-processed (amber dot). Filtered date defaults to the last 10 years — expand to the full archive via the toggle on the search page.