Cited by

Gallo v. Traina, 166 N.H. 737, 740 (2014); State v. Blackmer, 149 N.H. 47, 49 (2003).

As the appealing parties, the defendants have the burden of demonstrating reversible error.

As the appealing parties, the plaintiffs have the burden of demonstrating reversible error.

As the appealing parties, the plaintiffs have the burden of demonstrating reversible error.

As the appealing parties, the plaintiffs have the burden of demonstrating reversible error.

4 As the appealing party, Roof has the burden of demonstrating reversible error.

As the appealing party, the plaintiff has the burden of demonstrating reversible error.

As appealing parties, Thibeault and Andover have the burden of demonstrating reversible error in their respective appeals.

As the appealing parties, the defendants have the burden of demonstrating reversible error.

To the extent that she challenges factual determinations and procedures employed in the trial court, the plaintiff, as the appealing party, has the burden of demonstrating reversible error.

As the appealing party, the defendant has the burden of demonstrating reversible error.

As the appealing party, the petitioner has the burden of demonstrating reversible error.

As the appealing party, the husband has the burden of demonstrating reversible error.

It is the petitioner’s burden, as the appealing party, to demonstrate reversible error.

As the appealing party, the plaintiff has the burden to demonstrate reversible error.

As the appealing party, the plaintiff has the burden of demonstrating reversible error.

As the appealing party, the plaintiff has the burden of demonstrating reversible error.

Gallo v. Traina, 166 N.H. 737, 740 (2014); see also State v. Blackmer, 149 N.H. 47, 49 (2003) (explaining that issues raised without developed legal argument do not warrant appellate review).

As the appealing party, the defendant has the burden of demonstrating reversible error.

It is the plaintiff’s burden on appeal to demonstrate reversible error.

Gallo v. Traina, 166 N.H. 737, 740 (2014); see also State v. Blackmer, 149 N.H. 47, 49 (2003) (explaining that issues raised without developed legal argument do not warrant appellate review).

As the appealing parties, the plaintiffs have the burden of demonstrating reversible error.

It is likewise the plaintiff’s burden, as the appealing party, to demonstrate reversible error.

To the extent the plaintiff seeks to ground her claims upon a number of other alleged adverse actions under the McDonnell Douglas framework, we have reviewed the summary judgment record, and conclude that the plaintiff has failed to establish that the trial court erred by granting summary judgment.

As the appealing party, the plaintiff has the burden of demonstrating reversible error.

As the appealing party, the defendant has the burden of demonstrating reversible error.

As the appealing party, the defendant has the burden of demonstrating reversible error.

As the appealing party, the defendant has the burden of demonstrating reversible error.

Gallo v. Traina, 166 N.H. 737, 740 (2014) (appellant bears burden to demonstrate reversible error).

As the appealing parties, they have the burden of demonstrating reversible error.

As the appealing party, the plaintiff has the burden of demonstrating reversible error.

As the appealing parties, the appellants have the burden of demonstrating reversible error.

As the appealing parties, the plaintiffs have the burden of demonstrating reversible error.

Gallo v. Traina, 166 N.H. 737, 740 (2014) (holding that the appealing party bears the burden of demonstrating reversible error).

As the appealing party, the plaintiff has the burden of demonstrating reversible error.

Id.; see also Gallo v. Traina, 166 N.H. 737, 740 (2014) (holding that the appealing party bears the burden of demonstrating reversible error).

As the appealing party, the defendant has the burden of demonstrating reversible error.

As the appealing party, the defendant has the burden of demonstrating reversible error.

As the appealing party, the plaintiff has the burden of demonstrating reversible error.

As the appealing party, the respondent has the burden of demonstrating reversible error.

As the appealing parties, the plaintiffs have the burden of demonstrating reversible error.

As the appealing party, the defendant has the burden of demonstrating reversible error.

As the appealing parties, the appellants have the burden of demonstrating reversible error.

As the appealing party, the respondent has the burden of demonstrating reversible error.

As the appealing party, the defendant has the burden of demonstrating reversible error.

As the appealing party, the husband has the burden of demonstrating reversible error.

As the appealing parties, the petitioners have the burden of demonstrating reversible error.

As the appealing party, the plaintiffs have the burden of demonstrating reversible error.

As the appealing party, the plaintiff has the burden of demonstrating reversible error.

As the appealing parties, the plaintiffs have the burden of demonstrating reversible error.