In re Estate of Richard W. Moen
In re Estate of Richard W. Moen, No. 2023-0081 (N.H. May 6, 2024).
The holding in the court’s own words
Based upon our review of the trial court’s orders, the appellants’ arguments, the relevant law, and the record submitted on appeal, we conclude that the appellants have not demonstrated reversible error.
Quoted verbatim from the opinion — no paraphrase, nothing generated. Not yet human-reviewed. How we find the holding.
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Ralph P. Gallo & a. v. Susan Traina & a. 166 N.H. 737
Opinion text
THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
SUPREME COURT
In Case No. 2023-0081, In re Estate of Richard W. Moen,
the court on May 6, 2024, issued the following order:
The court has reviewed the written arguments and the record submitted
on appeal, and has determined to resolve the case by way of this order. See
Sup. Ct. R. 20(2). The appellants, Allison Armijo, Elizabeth Moen, and David
Moen, appeal orders of the Circuit Court (Yazinski and Hersh, JJ.), arguing
that the court erred by: (1) not awarding damages to appellant David Moen in
the amount of $1,918.32, after vacating a preliminary injunction; and
(2) approving the final account without a hearing and allegedly without findings
of fact.
As the appealing parties, the appellants have the burden of
demonstrating reversible error. Gallo v. Traina, 166 N.H. 737, 740 (2014).
Based upon our review of the trial court’s orders, the appellants’ arguments,
the relevant law, and the record submitted on appeal, we conclude that the
appellants have not demonstrated reversible error. See id.
Affirmed.
MacDonald, C.J., and Bassett, Hantz Marconi, Donovan, and Countway,
JJ., concurred.
Timothy A. Gudas,
Clerk