In the Matter of Medhat Ismail & a. and Dawn Elsayed
In the Matter of Medhat Ismail & a. and Dawn Elsayed, No. 2023-0065 (N.H. Mar. 29, 2024).
The holding in the court’s own words
Based upon our review of the trial court’s thorough and well-reasoned order, the petitioners’ challenges to it, the relevant law, and the record submitted on appeal, we conclude that the petitioners have not demonstrated reversible error and affirm the court’s decision.
Quoted verbatim from the opinion — no paraphrase, nothing generated. Not yet human-reviewed. How we work.
Opinion text
THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
SUPREME COURT
In Case No. 2023-0065, In the Matter of Medhat Ismail & a.
and Dawn Elsayed, the court on March 29, 2024, issued the
following order:
The court has reviewed the written arguments and the record submitted on
appeal, and has determined to resolve the case by way of this order. See Sup. Ct.
R. 20(2). The petitioners, Medhat Ismail and Nagwa Hafez, appeal an order of the
Circuit Court (Prevett, J.), issued following a hearing, denying their petition for
grandparents’ visitation rights with respect to their grandchildren. See RSA 461-
A:13 (2018). The petitioners advance a variety of challenges to the trial court’s
order. As the appealing parties, the petitioners have the burden of demonstrating
reversible error. Gallo v. Traina, 166 N.H. 737, 740 (2014). Based upon our
review of the trial court’s thorough and well-reasoned order, the petitioners’
challenges to it, the relevant law, and the record submitted on appeal, we
conclude that the petitioners have not demonstrated reversible error and affirm
the court’s decision. See id.; Sup. Ct. R. 25(8).
Affirmed.
MacDonald, C.J., and Bassett, Hantz Marconi, Donovan, and Countway,
JJ., concurred.
Timothy A. Gudas,
Clerk