Travis Corcoran & a. v. Town of Weare
Travis Corcoran & a. v. Town of Weare, No. 2022-0658 (N.H. Jan. 24, 2024).
The holding in the court’s own words
Based upon our review of the trial court’s detailed and well-reasoned order, the plaintiffs’ challenges to it, the relevant law, and the record submitted on appeal, we conclude that the plaintiffs have not demonstrated reversible error and affirm the court’s decision.
Quoted verbatim from the opinion — no paraphrase, nothing generated. Not yet human-reviewed. How we work.
Opinion text
THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
SUPREME COURT
In Case No. 2022-0658, Travis Corcoran & a. v. Town of
Weare, the court on January 25, 2024, issued the following
order:
The court has reviewed the written arguments and the record submitted on
appeal, and has determined to resolve the case by way of this order. See Sup. Ct.
R. 20(2). The plaintiffs, Travis and Jennifer Corcoran, appeal an order of the
Superior Court (Messer, J.), issued following a hearing and a view of the property,
upholding a decision by the Town of Weare’s Zoning Board of Adjustment to
grant variances to Gil and Shelley Duquette for a garage that violates the Town’s
setback requirements. The plaintiffs advance a variety of challenges to the trial
court’s order. As the appealing parties, the plaintiffs have the burden of
demonstrating reversible error. Gallo v. Traina, 166 N.H. 737, 740 (2014). Based
upon our review of the trial court’s detailed and well-reasoned order, the
plaintiffs’ challenges to it, the relevant law, and the record submitted on appeal,
we conclude that the plaintiffs have not demonstrated reversible error and affirm
the court’s decision. See id.; Sup. Ct. R. 25(8).
Affirmed.
MacDonald, C.J., and Bassett, Hantz Marconi, Donovan, and Countway,
JJ., concurred.
Timothy A. Gudas,
Clerk