James Viau v. New England Logistics
James Viau v. New England Logistics, No. 2023-0230 (N.H. May 1, 2024).
The holding in the court’s own words
Based upon our review of the trial court’s narrative order, the defendant’s challenges to it, the relevant law, and the record submitted on appeal, we conclude that the defendant has not demonstrated reversible error and affirm the court’s decision.
Quoted verbatim from the opinion — no paraphrase, nothing generated. Not yet human-reviewed. How we work.
Opinion text
THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
SUPREME COURT
In Case No. 2023-0230, James Viau v. New England
Logistics, the court on May 1, 2024, issued the following order:
The court has reviewed the written arguments and the record submitted on
appeal, and has determined to resolve the case by way of this order. See Sup. Ct.
R. 20(2). The defendant, New England Logistics, appeals an order of the Circuit
Court (McIntyre, J.), issued following a hearing, finding it in contempt of the
court’s prior final order in a small claim action. As the appealing party, the
defendant has the burden of demonstrating reversible error. Gallo v. Traina, 166
N.H. 737, 740 (2014). Based upon our review of the trial court’s narrative order,
the defendant’s challenges to it, the relevant law, and the record submitted on
appeal, we conclude that the defendant has not demonstrated reversible error
and affirm the court’s decision. See id.; Sup. Ct. R. 25(8).
Affirmed.
MacDonald, C.J., and Bassett, Hantz Marconi, Donovan, and Countway,
JJ., concurred.
Timothy A. Gudas,
Clerk