Cited by

Mgmt., 151 N.H. 248, 250 (2004) (observing that it is the burden of the appealing party to provide this court with a record sufficient to decide the issues raised on appeal).

Mgmt., 151 N.H. 248, 250 (2004) (“It is the burden of the appealing party to provide this court with a record sufficient to decide the issues raised on appeal.”).

Such a claim or request for declaratory relief, however, was neither alleged in the complaint nor pursued at trial, and is therefore not properly before us. See Bean v. Red Oak Prop.

Mgmt., 151 N.H. 248, 250 (2004); see also In the Matter of Birmingham & Birmingham, 154 N.H. 51, 56 (2006) (self-represented litigants are bound by the same procedural rules that govern parties represented by counsel).

Mgmt., 151 N.H. 248, 250 (2004) (articulating long- standing rule that parties may not have review of issues not raised in the trial court).

Mgmt., 151 N.H. 248, 250 (2004); see also Town of Nottingham v. Newman, 147 N.H. 131, 137 (2001) (rules of appellate practice not relaxed for self-represented litigants).

Mgmt., 151 N.H. 248, 250 (2004); see also Sup.

Mgmt., 151 N.H. 248, 250 (2004); see also Sup.

Mgmt., 151 N.H. 248, 250 (2004) (stating that appealing party bears burden of providing a record on appeal sufficient to decide the questions raised, and that relevant portions of the evidentiary record not provided on appeal are presumed to support the result reached by the trial court).

Mgmt., 151 N.H. 248, 250 (2004); see also Sup.

Mgmt., 151 N.H. 248, 250 (2004) (articulating long-standing rule that parties may not have review of issues not raised in the trial court); State v. Therrien, 144 N.H. 433, 436-37 (1999) (finding challenge to evidentiary ruling not preserved when defendant, in response to trial court’s explanation why it would not allow certain testimony

Mgmt., 151 N.H. 248, 250 (2004) (holding that “[i]t is the burden of the appealing party.

Mgmt., 151 N.H. 248, 250 (2004) (noting that parties may not have judicial review of matters not raised in the trial court).

Mgmt., 151 N.H. 248, 250 (2004); see also Sup.

Mgmt., 151 N.H. 248, 250 (2004) (noting that parties may not have judicial review of matters not raised in the trial court); see also Sup.

Mgmt., 151 N.H. 248, 250-51 (2004); see also Sup.

to provide this court with a record sufficient to decide her issues on appeal[.]” Bean v. Red Oak Prop.

Mgmt., 151 N.H. 248, 250 (2004) (stating that appealing party bears burden to provide this court with those portions of the trial court record that are required to decide the issues raised).

Mgmt., 151 N.H. 248, 250 (2004) (assuming that relevant portions of the record not provided on appeal support the result reached by the trial court).

Mgmt., 151 N.H. 248, 250 (2004) (holding that “[i]t is the burden of the appealing party.

Mgmt., 151 N.H. 248, 250 (2004) (holding that “[i]t is the burden of the appealing party.

Mgmt., 151 N.H. 248, 250 (2004) (burden on appealing party to provide record sufficient to decide issues raised on appeal).

Mgmt., 151 N.H. 248, 250 (2004) (holding that “[i]t is the burden of the appealing party.

Mgmt., 151 N.H. 248, 250 (2004); see also Sup.

Mgmt., 151 N.H. 248, 250 (2004) (“It is the burden of the appealing party.

Mgmt., 151 N.H. 248, 250 (2004) (stating that the appealing party bears the burden on appeal to establish that all issues on appeal were raised in the trial court).

Mgmt., 151 N.H. 248, 250 (2004) (stating that appealing party bears burden to provide a record on appeal that is sufficient to decide the questions raised); see also Estate of Day v. Hanover Ins.

Mgmt., 151 N.H. 248, 250 (2004) (“It is a long-standing rule that parties may not have judicial review of matters not raised in the forum of trial.”); N.H. Dep’t of Corrections v. Butland, 147 N.H. 676, 679 (2002) (observing that, in order to satisfy the preservation requirement, issues which could not have been presented to the trial co

Mgmt., 151 N.H. 248, 250 (2004) (to satisfy preservation requirement, appellant must show that he raised his issue in the trial court).