Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite In re Nyhan, 802 A.2d 1183.

38 citing documents.

In the Matter of Aaron Bachhuber and Jennifer Bachhuber N.H. 2024
In the Matter of Nyhan and Nyhan, 147 N.H. 768, 771 (2002).
In the Matter of Michael Boisvert and Nicole Lariviere N.H. 2024
In the Matter of Nyhan and Nyhan, 147 N.H. 768, 770 (2002).
In the Matter of Shalyn McFadden and Jerry Landry N.H. 2023
In the Matter of Nyhan and Nyhan, 147 N.H. 768, 770 (2002).
In the Matter of Sushmita Anand and Anand Venkataramiah N.H. 2023
In the Matter of Nyhan and Nyhan, 147 N.H. 768, 770 (2002).
In the Matter of Bryanna Breed and Kevin Breed N.H. 2023
In the Matter of Nyhan and Nyhan, 147 N.H. 768, 770 (2002).
In the Matter of Kelly Goodwin and Adam Goodwin N.H. 2023
In the Matter of Nyhan and Nyhan, 147 N.H. 768, 770 (2002).
In the Matter of Stacey Spewock and Scott Spewock N.H. 2022
In the Matter of Nyhan and Nyhan, 147 N.H. 768, 770 (2002).
In the Matter of Theresa Rubin and James Rubin N.H. 2022
In the Matter of Nyhan and Nyhan, 147 N.H. 768, 770 (2002).
In the Matter of Jessica Buckley and Regan Buckley N.H. 2021
In the Matter of Nyhan and Nyhan, 147 N.H. 768, 770 (2002).
In the Matter of Andrew Cullen and Jacqueline Cullen N.H. 2020
In the Matter of Nyhan and Nyhan, 147 N.H. 768, 770 (2002).
In the Matter of Erica de Vries and Edward de Vries N.H. 2020
In the Matter of Nyhan and Nyhan, 147 N.H. 768, 770 (2002).
In the Matter of Kelly Kingsbury Roskilly and Ryan Roskilly N.H. 2020
In the Matter of Nyhan and Nyhan, 147 N.H. 768, 770 (2002).
In the Matter of Jennifer Marino and John Marino, III N.H. 2020
In the Matter of Nyhan and Nyhan, 147 N.H. 768, 770 (2002).
In the Matter of Cindy DePalo and Joseph DePalo N.H. 2020
In the Matter of Nyhan and Nyhan, 147 N.H. 768, 770 (2002).
In the Matter of Jeremiah Comeford and Breanna Comeford N.H. 2019
In the Matter of Nyhan and Nyhan, 147 N.H. 768, 770 (2002).
In the Matter of Erica Cowen and Charles Cowen N.H. 2019
In the Matter of Nyhan and Nyhan, 147 N.H. 768, 770 (2002).
In the Matter of Thomas Gelinas and Karin Gelinas N.H. 2019
In the Matter of Nyhan and Nyhan, 147 N.H. 768, 770 (2002).
In the Matter of Jason Nutter and Katherine Nutter N.H. 2019
In the Matter of Nyhan and Nyhan, 147 N.H. 768, 770-71 (2002).
In the Matter of Regina Gagne and Paul Gagne N.H. 2018
In the Matter of Nyhan and Nyhan, 147 N.H. 768, 770 (2002).
In the Matter of Rebecca Stanley-Snelling and Randall Snelling N.H. 2018
In the Matter of Nyhan and Nyhan, 147 N.H. 768, 770 (2002).
In the Matter of Laura Woodbury and Travis Woodbury N.H. 2018
In the Matter of Nyhan and Nyhan, 147 N.H. 768, 770 (2002).
In the Matter of Steven Hoyt and Lesley Hoyt 196 A.3d 85 N.H. 2018
“On appeal, we will affirm the findings and rulings of the trial court unless they are unsupported by the evidence or legally erroneous.” In the Matter of Nyhan and Nyhan, 147 N.H. 768, 770 (2002); In the Matter of Plaisted & Plaisted, 149 N.H. 522, 523 (2003).
In The Matter of Edythe Murphy and Kevin Rogers N.H. 2018
In the Matter of Nyhan and Nyhan, 147 N.H. 768, 770 (2002).
In the Matter of Kathleen Gainor-Ghobashi and Mohamed Ghobashi N.H. 2017
In the Matter of Nyhan and Nyhan, 147 N.H. 768, 770 (2002).
In the Matter of Christopher Lawton and Christi Lawton N.H. 2017
In the Matter of Nyhan and Nyhan, 147 N.H. 768, 770 (2002).
In the Matter of Keli Eckroate-Breagy and Paul Breagy 168 A.3d 1148 N.H. 2017
In the Matter of Heinrich & Heinrich, 164 N.H. 357, 361-62 (2012) (holding that the petitioner’s lump sum workers’ compensation award, received one day before petitioner filed for divorce, was marital property); In the Matter of Nyhan and Nyhan, 147 N.H. 768, 770-71 (2002) (affirming the trial court’s valuation of contributions made to retirement accounts as of the date of the final hearing, which took place before the decree was issued); In the Matter of Gordon & Gordon, 147 N.H. 693, 696-97 (2
In re Guardianship of M.R.; In the Matter of Tammy Desilets & a. and Natasha Duby & a. N.H. 2017
In the Matter of Nyhan and Nyhan, 147 N.H. 768, 770 (2002).
In the Matter of Caren Logan and James Logan N.H. 2017
In the Matter of Nyhan and Nyhan, 147 N.H. 768, 770 (2002); see also Celestica, LLC v. Communications Acquisitions Corp., 168 N.H. 276, 280 (2015).
In the Matter of Amanda Herman and Nathan Adams N.H. 2016
In the Matter of Nyhan and Nyhan, 147 N.H. 768, 770 (2002).
In the Matter of Wayne Sarette and Linda Sarette N.H. 2015
In the Matter of Nyhan and Nyhan, 147 N.H. 768, 771 (2002).
In the Matter of Keli Eckroate-Breagy and Paul Breagy N.H. 2015
Assuming, without deciding, that these issues are not moot, we note that the trial court has the discretion to determine whether to award interest for delayed payments, see In the Matter of Nyhan and Nyhan, 147 N.H. 768, 771 (2002), and conclude that the trial court did not unsustainably exercise its discretion by not awarding interest or security in this case, see id.
In the Matter of Philip Wyzik and Lisa Hayward-Wyzik N.H. 2015
In the Matter of Nyhan and Nyhan, 147 N.H. 768, 770 (2002) (stating IRA and 401(k) accounts not subject to Hodgins rule); cf. Hodgins v. Hodgins, 126 N.H. 711, 716 (1985) superseded on other grounds by statute, RSA 458:16–a, as recognized in Nyhan, 147 N.H. at 770 (identifying formula for equitably apportioning pension benefits when actual and contingent benefits
In Re Aube 969 A.2d 338 N.H. 2009
I. Statutory Post-Judgment Interest Award The respondent first contends that awarding the petitioner statutory post-judgment interest was error under In the Matter of Nyhan and Nyhan, 147 N.H. 768, 771 (2002).
In Re Costa 937 A.2d 288 N.H. 2007
Thus, the inclusion of pre-marital retirement savings in the property division, see Crowe, 148 N.H. at 222, as well as savings accumulated after the filing of a divorce petition, see In the Matter of Nyhan & Nyhan, 147 N.H. 768, 770-71 (2002), is permitted if necessary to achieve an equitable award.
In Re Chamberlin 918 A.2d 1 N.H. 2007
Hoffman v. Hoffman, 143 N.H. 514, 521 (1999) (reviewing trial court’s valuation of marital assets for unsustainable exercise of discretion); cf. In the Matter of Nyhan and Nyhan, 147 N.H. 768, 771 (2002) (‘We reiterate the rule that trial courts are free to exercise their sound discretion in establishing an appropriate valuation date for the equitable distribution of marital assets.”).
In re Giacomini 868 A.2d 283 N.H. 2005
Likewise, the respondent’s reliance on In the Matter of Nyhan and Nyhan, 147 N.H. 768 (2002), is misplaced.
In re Nyhan 867 A.2d 470 N.H. 2005
In the Matter of Nyhan and Nyhan, 147 N.H. 768 (2002).
State v. Eastman 834 A.2d 211 N.H. 2003
CT. R. 47; cf. In the Matter of Nyhan and Nyhan, 147 N.H. 768, 770 (2002).

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by