Cited by

id.; see also State v. King, 168 N.H. 340, 342 (2015) (defining circumstantial evidence doctrine, as expressed in jury instructions).

sly determined that “[c]ircumstantial evidence may be sufficient to support a finding of guilty beyond a reasonable doubt” and that “the trier may draw reasonable inferences from facts proved and also inferences from facts found as a result of other inferences, provided they can be reasonably drawn therefrom.” State v. Germain, 165 N.H. 350, 355 (2013), modified on other grounds by State v. King, 168 N.H. 340, 345 (2015) (quotations omitted).

Because the evidence adduced at trial regarding the defendant’s “reckless” intent was solely circumstantial, in order to prevail on appeal, “the defendant must establish that the evidence does not exclude all reasonable conclusions except guilt.” State v. Germain, 165 N.H. 350, 361 (2013), modified on other grounds by State v. King, 168 N.H. 340, 345 (2015).

State v. Germain, 165 N.H. 350, 361 (2013), modified on other grounds by State v. King, 168 N.H. 340, 345 (2015).

Given the totality of the evidence, we conclude that the defendant has not met her “burden to demonstrate that no rational trier of fact, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the State, could have found guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.” State v. Germain, 165 N.H. 350, 362 (2013) (quotation omitted), modified on other grounds by State v. King, 168 N.H. 340, 345 (2015); see also State v. Gagne, 165 N.H. 363, 367 (2013) (emphasizing that when evidence as to an element is solely circu

We “consider whether the circumstances presented are consistent with guilt and inconsistent, on the whole, with any reasonable hypothesis of innocence.” State v. Germain, 165 N.H. 350, 362 (2013), modified in part on other grounds by State v. King, 168 N.H. 340, 345 (2015) (quotation omitted).

State v. Germain, 165 N.H. 350, 361 (2013), modified on other grounds in part by State v. King, 168 N.H. 340, 345 (2015).

State v. Germain, 165 N.H. 350, 361 (2013), modified on other grounds in part by State v. King, 168 N.H. 340, 345 (2015).

State v. Germain, 165 N.H. 350, 361 (2013), modified in part on other grounds by State v. King, 168 N.H. 340, 345 (2015).

State v. Germain, 165 N.H. 350, 359, 79 A.3d 1025 (2013), modified in part on other grounds by State v. King, 168 N.H. 340, 345, 127 A.3d 1255 (2015).

State v. Germain, 165 N.H. 350, 361 (2013), modified on other grounds by State v. King, 168 N.H. 340, 345 (2015).

State v. Germain, 165 N.H. 350, 361 (2013), abrogated on other grounds by State v. King, 168 N.H. 340, 345 (2015).

The remaining issues that the defendant raised in his notice of appeal, but did not brief, are deemed waived.

This means that we examine the record to determine whether it establishes an objective basis to sustain the trial court’s discretionary judgments.

This means that we examine the record to determine whether it establishes an objective basis to sustain the trial court’s discretionary judgments.