Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite In the Matter of Mary E. Sheys and Eric Blackburn, 168 N.H. 35.

14 citing documents.

In the Matter of Nat King Rosa and Jennifer Rosa N.H. 2026
In the Matter of Sheys & Blackburn, 168 N.H. 35, 39 (2015).
Hologic, Inc. v. Comm’r, N.H. Dep’t of Revenue Admin. 2026 N.H. 32 N.H. 2026
We address the plaintiff’s constitutional arguments “in the first instance” because they present purely legal questions; as such, “there is only one way the trial court could have ruled as a matter of law.” Cf. In the Matter of Sheys & Blackburn, 168 N.H. 35, 40 (2015) (declining to address discretionary issue in the first instance).
In the Matter of Taylor Coyne and Ashley Blanchfield N.H. 2025
In the Matter of Sheys & Blackburn, 168 N.H. 35, 39 (2015).
State of New Hampshire v. Timothy R. Verrill N.H. 2022
In the Matter of Sheys & Blackburn, 168 N.H. 35, 39 (2015) (“The interpretation of a court order is a question of law, which we review de novo.”).
State of New Hampshire v. Juan Alberto Monegro-Diaz N.H. 2022
In the Matter of Sheys & Blackburn, 168 N.H. 35, 39 (2015) (“The interpretation of a court order is a question of law, which we review de novo.”).
In the Matter of Senay Akin and Nedim Suljevic N.H. 2022
In the Matter of Sheys & Blackburn, 168 N.H. 35, 39 (2015) (“The interpretation of a court order is a question of law, which we review de novo.”).
Kerriann Catlaw v. Gill Rodrigue N.H. 2021
In the Matter of Sheys & Blackburn, 168 N.H. 35, 39 (2015) (“The interpretation of a court order is a question of law, which we review de novo.”).
Appeal of Estate of Peter Dodier N.H. 2021
In the Matter of Sheys & Blackburn, 168 N.H. 35, 39 (2015) (“The interpretation of a court order is a question of law, which we review de novo.”).
Saint Anselm College Corporation & a. v. Board of Trustees of Saint Anselm College N.H. 2021
“The interpretation of a court order is a question of law, which we review de novo.” In the Matter of Sheys & Blackburn, 168 N.H. 35, 39 (2015).
Petition of State of New Hampshire (State v. Karnes) N.H. 2020
“The interpretation of a court order is a question of law, which we review de novo.” In the Matter of Sheys & Blackburn, 168 N.H. 35, 39 (2015).
In the Matter of Eric McAndrews and Sachet Woodson 193 A.3d 834 N.H. 2018
“When examining the language of a statute, we ascribe the plain and ordinary meaning to the words used.” In the Matter of Sheys & Blackburn, 168 N.H. 35, 37 (2015).
David Eldridge & a. v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC & a. N.H. 2017
In the Matter of Sheys & Blackburn, 168 N.H. 35, 39 (2015) (noting that “interpretation of a court order is a question of law, which we review de novo”).
In the Matter of Edwin Potter and Melissa Turcotte N.H. 2016
In the Matter of Sheys & Blackburn, 168 N.H. 35, 39 (2015).
In the Matter of Paula Geraghty and Kenneth Geraghty 150 A.3d 386 N.H. 2016
In the Matter of Sheys & Blackburn, 168 N.H. 35, 39 (2015) (“The interpretation of a court order is a question of law, which we review de novo.”).