Cited by

Here, however, the trial court expressly found that “there was no prejudice to the Defendant,” and, because the defendant has not provided a transcript of the trial, “we must assume that the evidence was sufficient to support the result reached by the trial court.” Bean v. Red Oak Prop.

Mgmt., 151 N.H. 248, 250 (2004) (providing that appealing party has burden of providing all relevant portions of record on appeal, and that relevant portions of record not provided are presumed to support trial court’s decision).

Mgmt., 151 N.H. 248, 250 (2004) (stating that “[i]t is a long-standing rule that parties may not have judicial review of matters not raised in the forum of trial”).

“It is a long-standing rule that parties may not have judicial review of matters not raised in the forum of trial.” Bean v. Red Oak Prop.

Mgmt., 151 N.H. 248, 250 (2004) (“It is the burden of the appealing party.

Mgmt., 151 N.H. 248, 250-51 (2004); see also In the Matter of Birmingham & Birmingham, 154 N.H. 51, 56 (2006) (self-represented litigants are bound by the same procedural rules that govern parties represented by counsel).

Mgmt., 151 N.H. 248, 250 (2004) (parties may not have judicial review of matters not raised in the trial court); see also In the Matter of Birmingham & Birmingham, 154 N.H. 51, 56 (2006) (self-represented litigants are bound by the same procedural rules that govern parties represented by counsel).

Mgmt., 151 N.H. 248, 250 (2004) (“It is the burden of the appealing party.

Mgmt., 151 N.H. 248, 250-51 (2004), and warrant no further discussion, see Vogel v. Vogel, 137 N.H. 321, 322 (1993).

Mgmt., 151 N.H. 248, 250 (2004) (stating that appealing party bears burden to provide record sufficient to decide issues on appeal).

Mgmt., 151 N.H. 248, 250-51 (2004), and warrant no further discussion, see Vogel v. Vogel, 137 N.H. 321, 322 (1993); see also In the Matter of Birmingham & Birmingham, 154 N.H. 51, 56 (2006) (self-represented litigants are bound by the same procedural rules that govern parties represented by counsel).

Mgmt., 151 N.H. 248, 250-51 (2004), and warrant no further discussion, see Vogel v. Vogel, 137 N.H. 321, 322 (1993).

Mgmt., 151 N.H. 248, 250 (2004); see also Town of Nottingham v. Newman, 147 N.H. 131, 137 (2001) (rules of appellate practice not relaxed for self-represented litigants).

Mgmt., 151 N.H. 248, 250 (2004) (stating that appellant has burden to provide record sufficient to decide issues on appeal and, in the absence of sufficient record, we must assume that evidence was sufficient to support result trial court reached).

Mgmt., 151 N.H. 248, 250 (2004), or because they are insufficiently developed to warrant appellate review, see Kilnwood on Kanasatka Condo.

of Conway, 144 N.H. 642, 654-55 (2000) (party cannot raise issue for the first time in motion for reconsideration when issue was readily apparent at time party initially sought relief); Bean v. Red Oak Prop.

Mgmt., 151 N.H. 248, 250 (2004) (“It is a long-standing rule that parties may not have judicial review of matters not raised in the [trial court].”).

Mgmt., 151 N.H. 248, 250 (2004); see Town of Nottingham v. Newman, 147 N.H. 131, 137 (2001) (rules of appellate practice not relaxed for self-represented litigants).