Cited by

v. Ventullo, 151 N.H. 571, 576 (2004) (“Laches is an equitable doctrine that bars litigation when a potential plaintiff has slept on [her] rights.”).

v. Ventullo, 151 N.H. 571, 586 (2004) (stating that we assume the trial court made all subsidiary findings necessary to support its general finding).

v. Ventullo, 151 N.H. 571, 586 (2004) (explaining that we assume that the trial court made all findings necessary to support its decision).

v. Ventullo, 151 N.H. 571, 586 (2004) (we assume trial court made all findings necessary to support its decision).

v. Ventullo, 151 N.H. 571, 586 (2004) (stating that we assume trial court made all subsidiary findings necessary to support its general finding).

v. Ventullo, 151 N.H. 571, 586 (2004) (stating that we assume trial court made all subsidiary findings necessary to support its general finding).

v. Ventullo, 151 N.H. 571, 586 (2004) (stating trial court is assumed to have made all findings necessary to support its decision).

v. Ventullo, 151 N.H. 571, 586 (2004) (stating we assume trial court made all findings necessary to support its decision).

v. Ventullo, 151 N.H. 571, 586 (2004) (stating we assume trial court made all findings necessary to support its decision).

v. Ventullo, 151 N.H. 571, 586 (2004) (we assume trial court made all subsidiary findings necessary to support its decision); see also Salesky, 157 N.H. at 703.

v. Ventullo, 151 N.H. 571, 586 (2004) (we assume trial court made all findings necessary to support its decision, even if it did not do so expressly), and conclude that the record supports such a finding, see Behrens, 153 N.H. at 500-01.

v. Ventullo, 151 N.H. 571, 586 (2004) (the trial court is presumed to have made all subsidiary findings necessary to support its general finding).

v. Ventullo, 151 N.H. 571, 575-76 (2004) (quotation, brackets and emphasis omitted), such interest may, nonetheless, constitute a vested property right, subject to protection, see, e.g., Ohio State Life Insurance Company, 274 F.2d at 777 (holding that policyholders had “a vested contract right to the beneficial interest in the surplus” of the

v. Ventullo, 151 N.H. 571, 575-76, 864 A.2d 1079 (2004) (quotation, brackets and emphasis omitted), such interest may, nonetheless, constitute a vested property right, subject to protection, see, e.g., Ohio State Life Insurance Company, 274 F.2d at 777 (holding that policyholders had "a vested contract right to the beneficial interest in the

Nordic Inn Condo Owners’ Assoc.

v. Ventullo, 151 N.H. 571, 576-77 (2004) (reviewing decision on equitable doctrine of laches).

When a tort is of a continuing nature, “although the initial tortious act may have occurred longer than the statutory period prior to the filing of an action, an action will not be barred if it can be based upon the continuance of that tort within that period.” Nordic Inn Condo.

v. Ventullo, 151 N.H. 571, 586 (2004) (we assume trial courts make subsidiary findings necessary to support general findings).