Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite New Hampshire Department of Corrections v. Butland, 797 A.2d 860.

89 citing documents.

Moffat v. Srebro 2026 N.H. 25 N.H. 2026
N.H. Dep’t of Corrections v. Butland, 147 N.H. 676, 679 (2002).
State of New Hampshire v. Douglas Collins N.H. 2025
N.H. Dep’t of Corrections v. Butland, 147 N.H. 676, 679 (2002) (explaining issues that could not have been objected to at the time must be raised in a motion for reconsideration to be deemed preserved).
In the Matter of Anne Morse and Frank Morse N.H. 2025
N.H. Dep’t of Corrections v. Butland, 147 N.H. 676, 679 (2002) (explaining that if a party could not have been expected to raise an issue prior to the court’s ruling, then the party must raise the issue in a motion to reconsider).
Jack E. Lussier v. Meredith Brodeur N.H. 2024
R. 12(e); see N.H. Dep’t of Corrections v. Butland, 147 N.H. 676, 679 (2002).
Petition of State of New Hampshire N.H. 2024
N.H. Dep’t of Corrections v. Butland, 147 N.H. 676, 679 (2002); N.H. R. Crim.
In re Guardianship of D.E. N.H. 2023
N.H. Dept. of Corrections v. Butland, 147 N.H. 676, 679 (2002).
In the Matter of Frederick Wilkinson and Lisa Wilkinson N.H. 2023
Mgmt., 151 N.H. 248, 250 (2004) (“It is a long-standing rule that parties may not have judicial review of matters not raised in the forum of trial.”); N.H. Dep’t of Corrections v. Butland, 147 N.H. 676, 679 (2002) (observing that, in order to satisfy the preservation requirement, issues which could not have been presented to the trial court before its decision must be presented to it in a motion for reconsideration).
State of New Hampshire v. Therese M. Davis N.H. 2022
N.H. Dep’t of Corrections v. Butland, 147 N.H. 676, 679 (2002).
State of New Hampshire v. Andrew M. Fletcher N.H. 2022
N.H. Dep’t of Corrections v. Butland, 147 N.H. 676, 679 (2002) (alleged errors first presented in trial court order must be raised in motion for reconsideration to be preserved for appellate review).
In the Matter of Kayley Hays and Leigh Hays N.H. 2022
N.H. Dep’t of Corrections v. Butland, 147 N.H. 676, 678-79 (2002); see also Fam.
Followed In re J.D. In re A.D. N.H. 2022
Dep’t of Corrections v. Butland, 147 N.H. 676, 679 (2002).
K.M. v. V.F. N.H. 2022
Div. R. 1.8(I); N.H. Dep’t of Corrections v. Butland, 147 N.H. 676, 679 (2002) (issues first arising in court’s order must be raised in motion for reconsideration).
In the Matter of Matthew Kostiew and Alejandra Flores N.H. 2022
N.H. Dep’t of Corrections v. Butland, 147 N.H. 676, 679 (2002).
In re Guardianship of C.R. N.H. 2022
N.H. Dep’t of Corrections v. Butland, 147 N.H. 676, 679 (2002).
Peter Potenza & a. v. Joshua Lanctot & a.; Joshua Lanctot & a. v. Peter Potenza & a. N.H. 2020
LaMontagne Builders v. Bowman Brook Purchase Group, 150 N.H. 270, 274 (2003); N.H. Dep’t of Corrections v. Butland, 147 N.H. 676, 679 (2002).
State of New Hampshire v. Joshua S. Martin N.H. 2020
N.H. Dep’t of Corrections v. Butland, 147 N.H. 676, 679 (2002).
Winnie Zeng v. Ryan Amaro N.H. 2020
N.H. Dep’t of Corrections v. Butland, 147 N.H. 676, 679 (2002).
In the Matter of Elizabeth Bannon and Richard Bannon N.H. 2020
N.H. Dep’t of Corrections v. Butland, 147 N.H. 676, 679 (2002).
In the Matter of Maarten Postema and Linda Nimat N.H. 2020
Div. R. 1.26(F); see N.H. Dep’t of Corrections v. Butland, 147 N.H. 676, 679 (2002).
In the Matter of Christina Pangelinan and Jeffrey Nelson N.H. 2020
N.H. Dep’t of Corrections v. Butland, 147 N.H. 676, 679 (2002) (any issue that could not have been presented to trial court prior to its order must be presented in motion for reconsideration); Fam.
William D. Nicosia v. Town of Candia N.H. 2020
R. 12(e); see N.H. Dep’t of Corrections v. Butland, 147 N.H. 676, 679 (2002).
In the Matter of Daniela Gamboa Soriano and Benjamin Ross N.H. 2019
N.H. Dep’t of Corrections v. Butland, 147 N.H. 676, 679 (2002).
Jonathan A. Perfetto v. Cecilia Englander, M.D. N.H. 2019
R. 12(e); see N.H. Dep’t of Corrections v. Butland, 147 N.H. 676, 679 (2002).
City of Berlin v. Paul Croteau, Sr. & a. N.H. 2019
R. 12(e); see N.H. Dep’t of Corrections v. Butland, 147 N.H. 676, 679 (2002).
Darren Brady v. Family Dollar, Inc. & a. N.H. 2019
N.H. Dep’t of Corrections v. Butland, 147 N.H. 676, 679 (2002).
In the Matter of Rebecca Stanley-Snelling and Randall Snelling N.H. 2018
Div. R. 1.26(F); see N.H. Dep’t of Corrections v. Butland, 147 N.H. 676, 679 (2002).
Alan Armstrong & a. v. Maria Giakoumakis & a. N.H. 2018
R. 12(e); see N.H. Dep’t of Corrections v. Butland, 147 N.H. 676, 679 (2002).
State of New Hampshire v. Jack B. Flanagan, III N.H. 2018
P. 43(a); see N.H. Dep’t of Corrections v. Butland, 147 N.H. 676, 679 (2002).
James McManus v. Patrick Royal & a. N.H. 2018
R. 12(e); N.H. Dep’t of Corrections v. Butland, 147 N.H. 676, 679 (2002); see also Bean v. Red Oak Prop.
State of New Hampshire v. Ronald Martin N.H. 2018
R. 43(a); see N.H. Dep’t of Corrections v. Butland, 147 N.H. 676, 679 (2002).
Rochester City Council v. Rochester Zoning Board of Adjustment 194 A.3d 472 N.H. 2018
9 New Hampshire Department of Corrections v. Butland, 147 N.H. 676, 679 (2002).
In re Estate of Frederick G. McCaffery N.H. 2018
Div. R. 59-A(1); N.H. Dep’t of Corrections v. Butland, 147 N.H. 676, 679 (2002), we construe the trial court’s order to rule that the allegations in the affidavit, and the reasonable inferences that can be drawn from them, are insufficient to 2 state a claim for duress, and we agree with the ruling.
Robert L. Benjamin v. Vatche Manoukian & a. N.H. 2018
Fox v. Town of Greenland, 151 N.H. 600, 604 (2004) (stating that disqualification issues must be raised at earliest possible time); see also N.H. Dep’t of Corrections v. Butland, 147 N.H. 676, 679 (2002) (holding that appellant failed to preserve issue that she could not have been expected to raise until the trial court issued its order because she failed to raise it in a timely motion for reconsideration); cf. Rautenberg v. Munnis, 107 N.H. 446, 447 (1966) (noting that, once an appeal is taken,
Vention Medical Advanced Components, Inc. d/b/a Advanced Polymers, a Vention Medical Company v. Nikolaos D. Pappas & a. 188 A.3d 261 N.H. 2018
id.; N.H. Dep’t of Corrections v. Butland, 147 N.H. 676, 679 (2002).
Thomas A. Tardif v. Belknap County Convention N.H. 2018
R. 12(e); N.H. Dep’t of Corrections v. Butland, 147 N.H. 676, 679 (2002).
Brian L. Bilodeau & a. v. Elizabeth B. Cutting & a. N.H. 2018
As to the third argument, we note that, even if the final order contravened a pretrial ruling, any pretrial ruling was necessarily interlocutory, see Goudreault v. Kleeman, 158 N.H. 236, 249 (2009), and the record does not reflect that plaintiffs ever brought the alleged error to the trial court’s attention in a motion for reconsideration, see N.H. Dep’t of Corrections v. Butland, 147 N.H. 676, 678-79 (2002) (holding that challenge to trial court’s use of a standard in final order that was diffe
In the Matter of Gregory Neal and Lauren DiGiulio 184 A.3d 90 N.H. 2018
N.H. Dep’t of Corrections v. Butland, 147 N.H. 676, 679 (2002).
In The Matter Of Carol Perkins and Warner Knowles N.H. 2018
LaMontagne Builders v. Bowman Brook Purchase Group, 150 N.H. 270, 274 (2003); N.H. Dep’t of Corrections v. Butland, 147 N.H. 676, 679 (2002).
Greater New Hampshire Properties, LLC v. Kelly Rousseau N.H. 2018
Div. R. 3.11(E)(1); see N.H. Dep’t of Corrections v. Butland, 147 N.H. 676, 679 (2002).
James Faro & a. v. IKO Industries, Inc. N.H. 2018
Ct. R. 12(e) (“To preserve issues for an appeal to the Supreme Court, an appellant must have given the court the opportunity to consider such issues; thus, to the extent that the court, in its decision, addresses matters not previously raised in the case, a party must identify any alleged errors concerning those matters in a motion [for reconsideration].”); N.H. Dep’t of Corrections v. Butland, 147 N.H. 676, 679 (2002) (holding that challenge to alleged error that appellant could not have antici
Cathie A. Partridge-White v. Jonathan Ramsdell N.H. 2017
R. 12(e); N.H. Dep’t of Corrections v. Butland, 147 N.H. 676, 679 (2002).
In the Matter of Carolina Dahlqvist and Alberto Jose Marca Cham N.H. 2017
Div. R. 1.26(F); see N.H. Dep’t of Corrections v. Butland, 147 N.H. 676, 679 (2002).
Anthony Venti v. Town of Newport N.H. 2017
LaMontagne Builders v. Bowman Brook Purchase Group, 150 N.H. 270, 274 (2003); N.H. Dep’t of Corrections v. Butland, 147 N.H. 676, 679 (2002).
State of New Hampshire v. George J. Sartorelli N.H. 2017
R. 43(a); see N.H. Dep’t of Corrections v. Butland, 147 N.H. 676, 679 (2002).
Christina DePamphilis v. Paul Maravelias N.H. 2017
Div. R. 3.11(E)(1); see N.H. Dep’t of Corrections v. Butland, 147 N.H. 676, 679 (2002).
State of New Hampshire v. Wilfred Bergeron N.H. 2017
id.; see also N.H. Dep’t of Corrections v. Butland, 147 N.H. 676, 679 (2002).
James White v. Stanley Kowalczyk & a. N.H. 2017
N.H. Dep’t of Corrections v. Butland, 147 N.H. 676, 679 (2002).
McCaffrey Professional Association v. McDowell & Osburn, P.A N.H. 2017
R. 12(e); see N.H. Dep’t of Corrections v. Butland, 147 N.H. 676, 679 (2002).
Steven J. Cohen v. John Raymond & a. N.H. 2017
R. 12(e); N.H. Dep’t of Corrections v. Butland, 147 N.H. 676, 679 (2002) (issues that could not have been raised prior to trial court’s decision on the merits must be raised in motion for reconsideration).
In the Matter of Tara Broom and Jeffrey Broom N.H. 2017
Div. R. 1.26(F); see N.H. Dep’t of Corrections v. Butland, 147 N.H. 676, 679 (2002).

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by