Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite New Hampshire Department of Corrections v. Butland, 797 A.2d 860.

89 citing documents.

Mason Horse & Trail v. Amy Bergeron & a. N.H. 2017
Assuming, without deciding, that the plaintiff preserved this issue for review, but see N.H. Dep’t of Corrections v. Butland, 147 N.H. 676, 679 (2002), we conclude that the record supports the trial court’s final order.
State v. Sean McInnis 169 N.H. 565 N.H. 2017
at 27; see also N.H. Dep’t of Corrections v. Butland, 147 N.H. 676, 679 (2002).
Mark E. McDonough v. Patrick M. McDonough & a. 169 N.H. 537 N.H. 2016
LaMontagne Builders v. Bowman Brook Purchase Group, 150 N.H. 270, 274 (2003); N.H. Dep’t of Corrections v. Butland, 147 N.H. 676, 679 (2002).
In the Matter of Aileen MacNaughton and Martin Robert N.H. 2016
Div. R. 1.26(F); see N.H. Dep’t of Corrections v. Butland, 147 N.H. 676, 679 (2002).
Nicole Kilgore v. Brendan Philbrick N.H. 2016
N.H. Dep’t of Corrections v. Butland, 147 N.H. 676, 679 (2002) (stating that any issues that could not have been presented to trial court prior to its decision must be presented to it in a motion for reconsideration); Dist.
State of New Hampshire v. David Richard Lemieux N.H. 2016
N.H. Dep’t of Corrections v. Butland, 147 N.H. 676, 679 (2002).
In the Matter of Paula Geraghty and Kenneth Geraghty 150 A.3d 386 N.H. 2016
N.H. Dep’t of Corrections v. Butland, 147 N.H. 676, 679 (2002) (explaining that, in order to preserve issue, trial court must have opportunity to consider alleged errors and take remedial action).
In the Matter of Sumner Chabot and Brittney Ober N.H. 2016
Div. R. 1.26(F); see N.H. Dep’t of Corrections v. Butland, 147 N.H. 676, 679 (2002).
In the Matter of Gwenn Ferdinando and Bryan Ferdinando N.H. 2016
Div. R. 1.26(F); N.H. Dep’t of Corrections v. Butland, 147 N.H. 676, 679 (2002); State v. Porter, 144 N.H. 96, 100-01 (1999) (Rules of preservation are not relaxed for a self-represented party.).
State of New Hampshire v. Michael Moraros N.H. 2016
59-A(1); see N.H. Dep’t of Corrections v. Butland, 147 N.H. 676, 679 (2002).
State v. Christopher Gay 145 A.3d 1066 N.H. 2016
id.; see also N.H. Dep’t of Corrections v. Butland, 147 N.H. 676, 679 (2002).
Regent Park Associates v. Caleb Baird & a. N.H. 2016
N.H. Dep’t of Corrections v. Butland, 147 N.H. 676, 679 (2002).
New Hampshire Right to Life & a. v. Director, New Hampshire Charitable Trusts Unit & a. 143 A.3d 829 N.H. 2016
LaMontagne Builders v. Bowman Brook Purchase Group, 150 N.H. 270, 274 (2003); N.H. Dep’t of Corrections v. Butland, 147 N.H. 676, 679 (2002).
State of New Hampshire v. Isaac Jaillet N.H. 2016
N.H. Dep’t of Corrections v. Butland, 147 N.H. 676, 679 (2002) (holding that appellant’s claim that trial court violated her due process rights by applying wrong standard of review in its order was not preserved because appellant failed to raise issue in a motion for reconsideration).
In the Matter of Jill Content and Edward Content N.H. 2016
Bean, 151 N.H. at 250-51; see also N.H. Dep’t of Corrections v. Butland, 147 N.H. 676, 679 (2002).
Loretta Peterson v. Rock Bastianelli N.H. 2016
LaMontagne Builders v. Bowman Brook Purchase Group, 150 N.H. 270, 274 (2003); N.H. Dep’t of Corrections v. Butland, 147 N.H. 676, 679 (2002); see also In the Matter of Birmingham & Birmingham, 154 N.H. 51, 56 (2006) (self-represented litigants are bound by the same procedural rules that govern parties represented by counsel).
Sally A. Finan & a. v. Sheli Sokorelis & a. N.H. 2016
N.H. Dep’t of Corrections v. Butland, 147 N.H. 676, 679 (2002).
Petition of Steven J. Rubenzer, Ph.D., ABPP N.H. 2015
LaMontagne Builders v. 5 Bowman Brook Purchase Group, 150 N.H. 270, 274 (2003); N.H. Dep’t of Corrections v. Butland, 147 N.H. 676, 679 (2002).
In the Matter of Marion Fitanides and Craig Carlson N.H. 2015
Div. R. 1.26(F); N.H. Dep’t of Corrections v. Butland, 147 N.H. 676, 679 (2002).
Jahan Qureshi v. William J. Amann, Esq. & a. N.H. 2015
R. 12(e); see N.H. Dep’t of Corrections v. Butland, 147 N.H. 676, 679 (2002).
Burton D. Dow, III & a. v. Burton D. Dow, Sr. & a. N.H. 2015
Mgmt., 151 N.H. 248, 250 (2004); N.H. Dep’t of Corrections v. Butland, 147 N.H. 676, 679 (2002).
State of New Hampshire v. Amy Kathleen Mouser 168 N.H. 19 N.H. 2015
LaMontagne Builders v. Bowman Brook Purchase Group, 150 N.H. 270, 274 (2003); N.H. Dep’t of Corrections v. Butland, 147 N.H. 676, 679 (2002).
Peter N. Bookas v. Irene Liakakos N.H. 2015
R. 12(e); N.H. Dep’t of Corrections v. Butland, 147 N.H. 676, 679 (2002).
In the Matter of John Tucker, II and Holly Tucker N.H. 2015
Div. R. 1.26(F); N.H. Dep’t of Corrections v. Butland, 147 N.H. 676, 679 (2002).
In the Matter of Philip Wyzik and Lisa Hayward-Wyzik N.H. 2015
N.H. Dep’t of Corrections v. Butland, 147 N.H. 676, 679 (2002) (holding any issues that could not have been presented to trial court prior to its decision must be presented to it in motion for reconsideration); Fam.
Keith Garrett v. Laurie Garrett N.H. 2015
Div. R. 1.26(F) (any issues which could not have been presented to the trial court prior to its decision must be presented to it in a motion for reconsideration); N.H. Dep’t of Corrections v. Butland, 147 N.H. 676, 679 (2002).
In the Matter of Lisa Leary and John Leary N.H. 2015
Div. R. 1.26(F); see N.H. Dep’t of Corrections v. Butland, 147 N.H. 676, 679 (2002).
In the Matter of Maureen Crosson and Samuel Crosson N.H. 2015
Div. R. 1.26(F); N.H. Dep’t of Corrections v. Butland, 147 N.H. 676, 679 (2002).
State of New Hampshire v. Stefan R. Gauthier N.H. 2015
id.; see also N.H. Dep’t of Corrections v. Butland, 147 N.H. 676, 679 (2002); Super.
Town of Hampton v. Thomas L. Morgenstern N.H. 2015
R. 12(e); see N.H. Dep’t of Corrections v. Butland, 147 N.H. 676, 679 (2002).
Tamara Dukette v. Daniel Brazas 93 A.3d 734 N.H. 2014
N.H. Dep’t of Corrections v. Butland, 147 N.H. 676, 679 (2002).
State v. Rodriguez 64 A.3d 962 N.H. 2013
The State responds that the defendant failed to preserve this argument because he did not file a motion to reconsider asking the court to apply the correct legal standard, see New Hampshire Department of Corrections v. Butland, 147 N.H. 676 (2002), or make a specific contemporaneous objection during the hearing on the motion to set aside the verdicts, see State v. Ericson, 159 N.H. 379, 386 (2009); SUPER.
In Re Hampers 911 A.2d 14 N.H. 2006
N.H. Dep’t of Corrections v. Butland, 147 N.H. 676, 679 (2002).
LAMONTAGNE BUILDERS, INC. v. Brooks 910 A.2d 1162 N.H. 2006
N.H. Dep’t of Corrections v. Butland, 147 N.H. 676,679 (2002).
DeBenedetto v. CLD Consulting Engineers, Inc. 903 A.2d 969 N.H. 2006
N.H. Dep’t of Corrections v. Butland, 147 N.H. 676, 679 (2002).
Starr v. Governor 864 A.2d 348 N.H. 2004
N.H. Dep’t of Corrections v. Butland, 147 N.H. 676, 679 (2002) (appellant’s claim that trial court erred by applying wrong standard of review in its order not preserved because appellant failed to raise issue in motion for reconsideration).
Boston v. Sprague Energy Corp. 861 A.2d 781 N.H. 2004
In re Estate of Leonard, 128 N.H. 407, 409 (1986); N.H. Dep’t of Corrections v. Butland, 147 N.H. 676, 679 (2002) (we will not review constitutional issues on appeal that were not presented below).
LaMontagne Builders, Inc. v. Bowman Brook Purchase Group 837 A.2d 301 N.H. 2003
N.H. Dep’t of Corrections v. Butland, 147 N.H. 676, 679 (2002) (holding that appellant’s claim that trial court erred by applying wrong standard of review in its order was not preserved because appellant failed to raise issue in a motion for reconsideration).
Madeja v. MPB Corp. 821 A.2d 1034 N.H. 2003
N.H. Dep’t of Corrections v. Butland, 147 N.H. 676, 680 (2002).

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by