DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite Byblos Corp. v. Salem Farm Realty Trust, 692 A.2d 514.

13 citing documents.

  • J&C Properties v. Rayster Realty 2026 N.H. 12 N.H. 2026
    [¶23] Whether the statute of frauds applies to an agreement “is a question of law that we review de novo,” Byblos Corp. v. Salem Farm Realty Trust, 141 N.H. 726, 729 (1997), while “[w]hether an agreement complies with the statute of frauds is a mixed question of law and fact,” Tsiatsios v. Tsiatsios, 140 N.H. 173, 176 (1995).
  • Julia McLaughlin v. Leonard Jones, III N.H. 2021
    “Likewise, when certain factors, such as fraud, part performance or other equitable considerations, are present,” the trial court may dispense with the need for a written agreement.” Byblos Corp. v. Salem Farm Realty Trust, 141 N.H. 726, 731 (1997) (quotation omitted).
  • Wayne Ross, Trustee of the Wayne Ross Revocable Trust & a. v. Donald W. Ross & a. 172 A.3d 1069 N.H. 2017
    Byblos Corp. v. Salem Farm Realty Trust, 141 N.H. 726, 729 (1997).
  • Hogan Family Enterprises, Ltd. v. Town of Rye 951 A.2d 159 N.H. 2008
    Byblos Corp. v. Salem Farm Realty Trust, 141 N.H. 726, 731 (1997).
  • J.G.M.C.J. Corp. v. C.L.A.S.S., Inc. 924 A.2d 400 N.H. 2007
    Byblos Corp. v. Salem Farm Realty Trust, 141 N.H. 726, 729 (1997).
  • In Re Fulton 910 A.2d 1180 N.H. 2006
    Byblos Corp. v. Salem Farm Realty Trust, 141 N.H. 726, 728-29 (1997).
  • Appeal of Wingate 813 A.2d 1176 N.H. 2002
    Co. v. Peck, 143 N.H. 603, 605 (1999), that we review de novo, Byblos Corp. v. Salem Farm Realty Trust, 141 N.H. 726, 729 (1997).
  • PMC Corp. v. Houston Wire & Cable Co. 797 A.2d 125 N.H. 2002
    Byblos Corp. v. Salem Farm Realty Trust, 141 N.H. 726, 729 (1997).
  • Fichtner v. Pittsley 774 A.2d 1239 N.H. 2001
    RSA 173-B:3, VI; Byblos Corp. v. Salem Farm Realty Trust, 141 N.H. 726, 729 (1997).
  • Appeal of Land Acquisition, L.L.C. 767 A.2d 948 N.H. 2000
    [is a] questionf] of fact,” Byblos Corp. v. Salem Farm Realty Trust, 141 N.H. 726, 728-29, 692 A.2d 514, 516 (1997), and resolving factual disputes is within the board’s purview.
  • McDill v. Environamics Corp. 757 A.2d 162 N.H. 2000
    Byblos Corp. v. Salem Farm Realty Trust, 141 N.H. 726, 729, 692 A.2d 514, 516 (1997) (legal questions reviewed de novo).
  • State v. Paulsen 726 A.2d 902 N.H. 1999
    Whether the endangerment indictment was duplicitous is a question of law, which we review de novo, see Byblos Corp. v. Salem Farm Realty Trust, 141 N.H. 726, 729, 692 A.2d 514, 516 (1997).
  • In re 1994 Chevrolet Cavalier VIN 1G1JF14T7R7112126 New Hampshire Registration AWT291 708 A.2d 397 N.H. 1998
    Byblos Corp. v. Salem Farm Realty Trust, 141 N.H. 726, 729, 692 A.2d 514, 516 (1997).