Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite Raudonis v. Insurance Co. of North America, 623 A.2d 746.

25 citing documents.

Roy E. Lavallee v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company N.H. 2016
Co. of North America, 137 N.H. 57, 61 (1993) (stating that RSA 264:15, I, “requires that a person who is an insured” under a motor vehicle liability insurance policy “also be covered under the policy’s uninsured motorist section”).
Great American Dining, Inc. v. Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance 62 A.3d 843 N.H. 2013
Co. of North America, 137 N.H. 57, 59 (1993).
Rivera v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance 44 A.3d 498 N.H. 2012
Liability coverage did not apply to the passenger in Wegner because he was not responsible for the operation of the vehicle and therefore “was not insured under [the] policy’s general liability coverage under the circumstances in which [he] was injured.” Wegner, 148 N.H. at 110 (citing Raudonis v. Insurance Co. of North America, 137 N.H. 57, 61 (1993)).
Harrington v. Concord General Mutual Insurance 871 A.2d 54 N.H. 2005
Co. of North America, 137 N.H. 57, 59 (1993).
Swain v. Employers Mutual Casualty Co. 845 A.2d 1239 N.H. 2004
To support her argument, Swain relies upon language in Raudonis v. Insurance Company of North America, 137 N.H. 57, 61 (1993), where we stated: “The statute also requires that a person who is an insured in a particular situation under a policy’s general liability coverage also be covered in that situation under the policy’s uninsured motorist section.” If the quoted language was intended to be read as broadly as Swain suggests, ho
Trombley v. Liberty Mutual Insurance 813 A.2d 1202 N.H. 2002
Co. of North America, 137 N.H. 57, 59 (1993).
Wegner v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance 803 A.2d 598 N.H. 2002
The plaintiff is claiming UM coverage precisely because Albini’s general liability coverage was denied under a *110 policy provision stating that “[t]he coverages provided by this policy do not apply to any named insured or any household resident during a period of driver’s license suspension or revocation.” In Raudonis v. Insurance Co. of North America, 137 N.H. 57, 61 (1993), we held that RSA 264:15, I, did not mandate UM coverage to a person who was not insured under a policy’s general liabil
In re Guardianship of Lanoue 802 A.2d 1179 N.H. 2002
Co. of North America, 137 N.H. 57, 60 (1993) (quotations and ellipses omitted).
Appeal of Savage 737 A.2d 1109 N.H. 1999
Co. of North America, 137 N.H. 57, 60, 623 A.2d 746, 748 (1993).
State v. Williams 729 A.2d 416 N.H. 1999
Co. of North America, 137 N.H. 57, 61, 623 A.2d 746, 749 (1993), we decline to adopt the defendant’s construction in the absence of clearer legislative intent.
In re Jesse F. 722 A.2d 457 N.H. 1998
Co. of North America, 137 N.H. 57, 60, 623 A.2d 746, 748 (1993) (quotation and ellipses omitted).
Appeal of Brown 720 A.2d 66 N.H. 1998
Co. of North America, 137 N.H. 57, 60, 623 A.2d 746, 748 (1993).
Hudson v. Farm Family Mutual Insurance 697 A.2d 501 N.H. 1997
Co. of North America, 137 N.H. 57, 59, 623 A.2d 746, 747 (1993); see also Holden Eng’g and Surveying v. Pembroke Rd.
Gisonni v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 687 A.2d 709 N.H. 1996
The plaintiff also cites our decision in Raudonis v. Insurance Co. of North America, 137 N.H. 57, 623 A.2d 746 (1993), to support her argument.
Arthur Whitcomb, Inc. v. Town of Carroll 686 A.2d 743 N.H. 1996
Co. of North America, 137 N.H. 57, 60, 623 A.2d 746, 748 (1993) (quotation omitted).
Maville v. Peerless Insurance 686 A.2d 1165 N.H. 1996
Co. of North America, 137 N.H. 57, 59, 623 A.2d 746, 747 (1993).
Turner v. St. Paul Property & Liability Insurance 676 A.2d 109 N.H. 1996
Co. of North America, 137 N.H. 57, 61, 623 A.2d 746, 749 (1993).
First Londonderry Development Corp. v. CNA Insurance Companies 669 A.2d 232 N.H. 1995
Co. of North America, 137 N.H. 57, 59, 623 A.2d 746, 747 (1993).
Town of Londonderry v. New Hampshire Municipal Ass'n Property Liability Insurance Trust, Inc. 667 A.2d 1024 N.H. 1995
Co. of North America, 137 N.H. 57, 59, 623 A.2d 746, 747 (1993).
Healey v. New Durham Zoning Board of Adjustment 665 A.2d 360 N.H. 1995
Co. of North America, 137 N.H. 57, 61, 623 A.2d 746, 749 (1993) (avoiding interpretation that would lead to absurd result).
Wright v. Loon Mountain Recreation Corp. 663 A.2d 1340 N.H. 1995
Co. of North America, 137 N.H. 57, 59, 623 A.2d 746, 747 (1993) (interpretation of insurance contract language a question of law; we construe terms as would reasonable person in insured’s position).
Laro v. Leisure Acres Mobile Home Park Associates 659 A.2d 432 N.H. 1995
Co. of North America, 137 N.H. 57, 61, 623 A.2d 746, 749 (1993) (presuming legislature does not enact statute leading to absurd result).
High Country Associates v. New Hampshire Insurance 648 A.2d 474 N.H. 1994
Co. of North America, 137 N.H. 57, 59, 623 A.2d 746, 747 (1993).
Doggett v. Town of North Hampton Zoning Board of Adjustment 645 A.2d 673 N.H. 1994
Co. of North America, 137 N.H. 57, 61, 623 A.2d 746, 749 (1993); Psychiatric Inst.
Concord General Mutual Insurance v. Mitchell 637 A.2d 903 N.H. 1994
Co. of North America, 137 N.H. 57, 59, 623 A.2d 746, 747 (1993).

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by