DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite State v. Blake, 305 A.2d 300.

26 citing documents.

  • Nancy Haskell v. Elizabeth Millett & a. N.H. 2024
    Div. R. 1.1; and whether to exclude witnesses from the courtroom in an otherwise public proceeding, see State v. Blake, 113 N.H. 115, 119 (1973).
  • State v. Laurent 744 A.2d 598 N.H. 1999
    The court, however, instructed the jury that the question came down to whether they believed the victim’s testimony.
  • State v. Williams 708 A.2d 55 N.H. 1998
    United States v. Williams, 504 U.S. 36, 48-50 (1992); United States v. Calandra, 414 U.S. 338, 345 (1974); see also State v. St.
  • State v. Hamel 547 A.2d 223 N.H. 1988
    State v. Blake, 113 N.H. 115, 119, 305 A.2d 300, 303 (1973); State v. Peters, 90 N.H. 438, 439, *617 10 A.2d 242, 244 (1939).
  • State v. Glidden 459 A.2d 1136 N.H. 1983
    Could you give us some help?” After denial of the defendant’s motion for a mistrial, the court instructed the jury in accordance with section 15-4.4 of the American Bar Association Standards for Criminal Justice, Trial by Jury, at 15-133 (2d ed. 1980) (volume 3); see State v. Niquette, 122 N.H. 870, 873-74, 451 A.2d 1292, 1294 (1982); State v. Blake, 113 N.H. 115, 124, 305 A.2d 300, 306 (1973).
  • State v. Perron 454 A.2d 422 N.H. 1982
    Since State v. Blake, 113 N.H. 115, 122, 305 A.2d 300, 305 (1973), we have followed the United States Supreme Court’s speedy-trial analysis in Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514, 530 (1972).
  • State v. Niquette 451 A.2d 1292 N.H. 1982
    Although we need not reach the merits of the defendant’s objection to the supplementary charge used in this case, we would strongly commend to our trial justices the suggestion which we first made in State v. Blake, 113 N.H. 115, 124, 305 A.2d 300, 306 (1973), that “in the future trial judges should consider the more circumscribed instructions recommended in the ABA Standards.” See ABA Standards for Criminal Justice, Trial by Jury, Standard 15-4.4, at 15-133 (2d ed. 1980).
  • State v. Siel 444 A.2d 499 N.H. 1982
    This issue was resolved long ago by this court in State v. Archer, 54 N.H. 465, 468 (1874), and was recently reaffirmed in State v. Blake, 113 N.H. 115, 121, 305 A.2d 300, 304 (1973).
  • State v. Weitzman 427 A.2d 3 N.H. 1981
    Barker v. Wingo supra; State v. Novosel supra; State v. Blake, 113 N.H. 115, 122, 305 A.2d 300, 305 (1973).
  • State v. Hardy 419 A.2d 398 N.H. 1980
    The State may charge a lesser offense even though its evidence may show a greater offense.
  • State v. Fraser 411 A.2d 1125 N.H. 1980
    State v. Cole supra; State v. Blake, 113 N.H. 115, 305 A.2d 300 (1973).
  • State v. Dufield 398 A.2d 818 N.H. 1979
    State v. Cole, 118 N.H. 829, 395 A.2d 189 (1978); State v. Blake, 113 N.H. 115,122, 305 A.2d 300, 305 (1973).
  • State v. Cole 395 A.2d 189 N.H. 1978
    State v. White, 116 N.H. 687, 366 A.2d 872 (1976); State v. Blake, 113 N.H. 115, 305 A.2d 300 (1973).
  • Martineau v. Helgemoe 379 A.2d 1040 N.H. 1977
    “Although it has been said that New Hampshire’s Constitution, statutes and case law fail to guarantee the right to a public trial (see In re Oliver, 333 U.S. 257 (1948)), the United States Supreme Court has held the right to a public trial applicable to the States.” State v. Blake, 113 N.H. 115, 118, 305 A.2d 300, 302 (1973).
  • State v. Lainey 375 A.2d 1162 N.H. 1977
    State v. Blake, 113 N.H. 115, 120, 305 A.2d 300, 304 (1973); Bourget v. Company, 98 N.H. 237, 244, 97 A.2d 383, 388 (1953).
  • Desmarais v. State of New Hampshire Personnel Commission 378 A.2d 1361 N.H. 1977
    Sequestration is a matter within the discretion of the trial authority, and it cannot be said that there was an abuse of discretion here.
  • State v. Black 368 A.2d 1177 N.H. 1976
    State v. Cote, 108 N.H. 290, 235 A.2d 111 (1967); State v. Blake, 113 N.H. 115, 305 A.2d 300 (1973); see United States v. Belt, 514 F.2d 837, 849 (D.C.
  • State v. Breest 367 A.2d 1320 N.H. 1976
    Smith v. Goguen, 415 U.S. 566, 574 (1974); State v. Blake, 113 N.H. 115, 120, 305 A.2d 300, 304 (1973).
  • State v. White 366 A.2d 872 N.H. 1976
    State v. Blake, 113 N.H. 115, 305 A.2d 300 (1973); Barker v. Wingo supra.
  • State v. Taschler 356 A.2d 697 N.H. 1976
    State v. Blake, 113 N.H. 115, 120, 305 A.2d 300, 304 (1973); State v. Grierson, 96 N.H. 36, 41-42, 69 A.2d 851, 855-56 (1949); State v. Roach, 82 N.H. 189, 192, 131 A. 606, 608 (1926); Kenney v. Hampton, 73 N.H. 45, 46, 58 A. 1046, 1047 (1904).
  • State v. Lemire 345 A.2d 906 N.H. 1975
    State v. Blake, 113 N.H. 115, 123, 305 A.2d 300, 305 (1973); State v. Robbins, 114 N.H. 427, 430, 321 A.2d 583, 585 (1974).
  • State v. Breest 345 A.2d 391 N.H. 1975
    State v. Blake, 113 N.H. 115, 305 A.2d 300 (1973); State v. O’Brien, 114 N.H. 233, 317 A.2d 783 (1974).
  • State v. McMillan 339 A.2d 21 N.H. 1975
    We recently, in State v. Blake, 113 N.H. 115, 305 A.2d 300 (1973), examined the state and federal constitutional guarantees of a speedy trial.
  • State v. Robbins 321 A.2d 583 N.H. 1974
    Contrary to defendant’s contention, no corroboration of the complainant’s testimony is essential in a rape case.
  • State v. Moody 319 A.2d 105 N.H. 1974
    State v. Cross, 111 N.H. 22, 274 A.2d 880 (1971); State v. Blake, 113 N.H. 115, 123, 305 A.2d 300, 305 (1973).
  • State v. St. Arnault 317 A.2d 789 N.H. 1974
    Costello v. United States, 350 U.S. 359 (1956); State v. Blake, 113 N.H. 115, 119, 305 A.2d 300, 303 (1973).