Cited by
Opinions in New Hampshire that cite State Employees' Ass'n v. State, 20 A.3d 961.
-
Roy E. Lavallee v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
N.H. 2016
“The interpretation of a statute is a question of law, which we review de novo.” State Employees’ Assoc.
-
Scott Anderson & a. v. Executive Director, New Hampshire Retirement System & a.
166 N.H. 752
N.H. 2014
of N.H. v. State of N.H., 161 N.H. 730, 734 (2011) (quotation omitted).
-
In re C.M. & a.
103 A.3d 1192
N.H. 2014
“In matters of statutory interpretation, we are the final arbiter of the intent of the legislature as expressed in the words of the statute considered as a whole.” State Employees’ Assoc.
- Petition of Gregory Malisos 166 N.H. 726 N.H. 2014
-
Autofair 1477, L.P. v. American Honda Motor Company, Inc.
166 N.H. 599
N.H. 2014
“The interpretation of a statute is a question of law, which we review de novo.” State Employees’ Assoc.
- Petition of David Eskeland 166 N.H. 554 N.H. 2014
-
In re Estate of Ruth C. McCarty
166 N.H. 548
N.H. 2014
2 “The interpretation of a statute is a question of law, which we review de novo.” State Employees’ Assoc.
-
State of New Hampshire v. Heidi Brouillette
166 N.H. 487
N.H. 2014
“The interpretation of a statute is a question of law, which we review de novo.” State Employees’ Assoc.
-
Appeal of Coos County Commissioners o/b/o the Unincorporated Places of Dixville, NH and Millsfield, NH
166 N.H. 379
N.H. 2014
“In matters of statutory interpretation, we are the final arbiter of the intent of the legislature as expressed in the words of the statute considered as a whole.” State Employees’ Assoc.
- In the Matter of the State of New Hampshire and Cory R. Lounder 166 N.H. 353 N.H. 2014
- Appeal of Town of Brookline 91 A.3d 627 N.H. 2014
-
Dennis G. Huckins v. Mark McSweeney & a.
90 A.3d 1236
N.H. 2014
of N.H. v. State of N.H., 161 N.H. 730, 735 (2011) (quotation omitted).
- Appeal of the Local Government Center, Inc. & a . 85 A.3d 388 N.H. 2014