DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite George v. Al Hoyt & Sons, Inc., 27 A.3d 697.

15 citing documents.

  • Manutsom v. Town of Hollis 2026 N.H. 27 N.H. 2026
    [¶21] As for whether the Town’s notice of the Property’s 2016 and 2018 tax liens sufficed under the Fourteenth Amendment, “because this issue may arise on remand and because both parties discuss it in their briefs, we address it.” George v. Al Hoyt & Sons, Inc., 162 N.H. 123, 138 (2011).
  • TJN, Inc. v. Abigail Mathes Pitou N.H. 2024
    does not require that damages be calculated with mathematical certainty, and the method used to compute them need not be 3 more than an approximation.” George v. Al Hoyt & Sons, Inc., 162 N.H. 123, 134, 135 (2011) (concluding, based on plaintiff’s testimony, that there was evidence in the record from which jury could have determined amount of lost profits damages).
  • Richard E. Clark, Esq. v. Ryan Carrier & a. N.H. 2021
    George v. Al Hoyt & Sons, Inc., 162 N.H. 123, 139 (2011).
  • Seacoast Helicopters, LLC v. Kevin Beaulieu N.H. 2020
    George v. Al Hoyt & Sons, Inc., 162 N.H. 123, 139 (2011).
  • Dawn Cate & a. v. Linda Hemingway & a. N.H. 2020
    “The goal of damages in actions for breach of contract is to put the non-breaching party in the same position it would have been in if the contract had been fully performed.” George v. Al Hoyt & Sons, Inc., 162 N.H. 123, 134 (2011).
  • Aleksandr Rudyak & a. v. Bearfoot Creek, LLC & a. N.H. 2020
    We give substantial deference to a trial court’s decision on attorney’s fees.” George v. Al Hoyt & Sons, Inc., 162 N.H. 123, 139 (2011) (quotation and citation omitted).
  • Seacoast Helicopters, LLC v. Kevin Beaulieu N.H. 2019
    George v. Al Hoyt & Sons, Inc., 162 N.H. 123, 139 (2011).
  • Michael Weeden v. Shawn O'Brien N.H. 2018
    George v. Al Hoyt & Sons, Inc., 162 N.H. 123, 140 (2011).
  • Eugene Gaudreau & a. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. & a. N.H. 2017
    The trial court may grant a motion to set aside the jury’s verdict when it is “conclusively against the weight of the evidence,” which means that the verdict “must be one no reasonable jury could return.” George v. Al Hoyt & Sons, Inc., 162 N.H. 123, 133 (2011).
  • Fat Bullies Farm, LLC v. Lori Devenport & a. 164 A.3d 990 N.H. 2017
    “An ordinary breach of contract claim, for example, is not a violation of the CPA.” George v. Al Hoyt & Sons, Inc., 162 N.H. 123, 129 (2011) (quotation omitted).
  • Peter Saunders & a. v. Town of Kingston N.H. 2015
    “[A] jury’s verdict may only be set aside if it is conclusively against the weight of the evidence or if it is the result of mistake, partiality, or corruption.” George v. Al Hoyt & Sons, Inc., 162 N.H. 123, 133 (2011) (quotation omitted).
  • In re Sophia-Marie H. 77 A.3d 1139 N.H. 2013
    George v. Al Hoyt & Sons, Inc., 162 N.H. 123, 138 (2011).
  • Maplevale Builders, LLC v. Town of Danville 70 A.3d 427 N.H. 2013
    [the] parties discuss it in their briefs.” George v. Al Hoyt & Sons, Inc., 162 N.H. 123, 138 (2011).
  • Axenics, Inc. v. Turner Construction Co. 62 A.3d 754 N.H. 2013
    George v. Al Hoyt & Sons, Inc., 162 N.H. 123, 138 (2011).
  • Rabbia v. Rocha 162 N.H. 734 N.H. 2011
    We give substantial deference to a trial court’s decision on attorney’s fees, and will not overturn it “absent an unsustainable exercise of discretion.” George v. Al Hoyt & Sons, Inc., 162 N.H. 123, 139 (2011).