Cited by
Opinions in New Hampshire that cite In Re Heinrich, 7 A.3d 1158.
-
In the Matter of Abigail Mathewson and Mark Stuenkel
N.H. 2024
In the Matter of Heinrich & Curotto, 160 N.H. 650, 655 (2010).
-
In the Matter of Nicole McCormack Parker and Roy Parker
N.H. 2024
In the Matter of Aube & Aube, 158 N.H. 459, 465-66 (2009); see In the Matter of Heinrich & Curotto, 160 N.H. 650, 657-58 (2010).
-
In the Matter of Marc Hebert and Kelly Hebert
N.H. 2024
In the Matter of Heinrich & Curotto, 160 N.H. 650, 657-58 (2010); cf. Baker Valley Lumber v. Ingersoll-Rand, 148 N.H. 609, 615 (2002) (explaining that objections to the basis of an expert’s opinion go to the weight to be accorded the opinion evidence, and not to its admissibility).
-
In the Matter of Kseniya Ausiaikova and Brian Meckel
N.H. 2021
In the Matter of Heinrich & Curotto, 160 N.H. 650, 655 (2010).
-
In the Matter of Daniel Lovejoy and Brittany Lovejoy
N.H. 2021
The mother argues that the father’s testimony was not credible, and that the trial court erroneously “weighed [the GAL’s] concerns and found [the father’s] oral testimony to hold more weight.” We have held that “[t]he recommendations of a GAL do not, and should not, carry any greater presumptive weight than the other evidence in a case.” In the Matter of Heinrich & Curotto, 160 N.H. 650, 657 (2010) (brackets and quotation omitted).
-
In the Matter of Andrew Cullen and Jacqueline Cullen
N.H. 2020
In the Matter of Heinrich & Curotto, 160 N.H. 650, 657 (2010).
-
In the Matter of Anthony Grillo and Malinda Nicolosi
N.H. 2020
In the Matter of Heinrich & Curotto, 160 N.H. 650, 655 (2010).
-
In the Matter of Sarah Pope and George Pope
N.H. 2020
In the Matter of Heinrich & Curotto, 160 N.H. 650, 655 (2010).
-
In the Matter of Matthew Higgins and Nicole Richards
N.H. 2020
In the Matter of Heinrich & Curotto, 160 N.H. 650, 654 (2010).
-
In the Matter of Sean Braunstein and Jericka Braunstein
N.H. 2020
In the Matter of Heinrich & Curotto, 160 N.H. 650, 657-58 (2010).
-
In the Matter of Haley St. Pierre and Adam Thatcher
211 A.3d 1213
N.H. 2019
In the Matter of Heinrich & Curotto, 160 N.H. 650, 655 (2010).
-
In the Matter of Giovanni Santiago and Meghan Morrissey
N.H. 2017
In the Matter of Heinrich & Curotto, 160 N.H. 650, 654-55 (2010) (stating applicability of RSA 461-A:12 is not limited to cases in which final parenting orders have already been issued).
-
In the Matter of Rebecca S. Ling and Richard J. Schaffer
N.H. 2015
At the outset, we note that “[t]he recommendations of a GAL do not, and should not, carry any greater presumptive weight than the other evidence in a case.” In the Matter of Heinrich & Curotto, 160 N.H. 650, 657 (2007) (brackets and quotation omitted).
-
In the Matter of W. Elizabeth Scheidegg and Jason Pulsifer
N.H. 2015
“Once the parent has met this prima facie burden, the burden shifts to the other parent to prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that relocating is not in the child’s best interests.” In the Matter of Heinrich & Curotto, 160 N.H. 650, 655 (2010); see RSA 461-A:12, VI.
-
Ford v. New Hampshire Department of Transportation
163 N.H. 284
N.H. 2012
In the Matter of Heinrich & Curotto, 160 N.H. 650, 654-55 (2010).
-
Ford v. NEW HAMPSHIRE DEPT. OF TRANSP.
37 A.3d 436
N.H. 2012
In the Matter of Heinrich & Curotto, 160 N.H. 650, 654-55, 7 A.3d 1158 (2010).
-
Leone v. Leone
20 A.3d 330
N.H. 2011
In the Matter of Heinrich & Curotto, 160 N.H. 650, 655 (2010).
-
Appeal of Johnson
13 A.3d 315
N.H. 2011
In the Matter of Heinrich & Curotto, 160 N.H. 650, 654-55 (2010).