DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite In Re O'Neil, 992 A.2d 672.

14 citing documents.

  • Petition of K.S. 2024 N.H. 62 N.H. 2024
    In the Matter of O’Neil & O’Neil, 159 N.H. 615, 624 (2010).
  • State of New Hampshire v. Michael Caterson N.H. 2023
    Miles, 175 N.H. at 409-10; In the Matter of O’Neil & O’Neil, 159 N.H. 615, 624 (2010) (“Generally a matter is moot when it no longer presents a justiciable controversy because issues involved have become academic or dead.” (quotation omitted)).
  • Gaetane Benner v. Claudette Grenier N.H. 2022
    In the Matter of O’Neil & O’Neil, 159 N.H. 615, 622 (2010).
  • Petition of Devin Miles N.H. 2022
    In the Matter of O’Neil & O’Neil, 159 N.H. 615, 624 (2010) (“Generally a matter is moot when it no longer presents a justiciable controversy because issues involved have become academic or dead” (quotation omitted)).
  • In the Matter of Philip Borelli and Catherine Borelli N.H. 2022
    In the Matter of O’Neil & O’Neil, 159 N.H. 615, 622 (2010); RSA 490-D:2, I (2010); RSA 490-F:18 (Supp. 2021) (references in statutes to the judicial branch family division shall be deemed to be to the circuit court where it has exclusive subject matter jurisdiction).
  • In the Matter of Brian Colsia and Allana Kelley-Colsia N.H. 2022
    In the Matter of O’Neil & O’Neil, 159 N.H. 615, 624 (2010); see Eastman v. Bank, 58 N.H. 421, 422 (1878) (explaining that the appointment of a receiver “is a matter resting in the sound discretion of the court, and when appointed he is virtually an officer of the court and subject to [its] orders”).
  • In the Matter of Matthew Routhier and Kelly Routhier N.H. 2022
    In the Matter of O’Neil & O’Neil, 159 N.H. 615, 624 (2010).
  • Marcella Paul-Roc & a. v. Matthew Demio N.H. 2020
    In the Matter of O’Neil & O’Neil, 159 N.H. 615, 624 (2010).
  • In the Matter of Tara Broom and Jeffrey Broom N.H. 2017
    RSA 490-D:3 (2010); see also RSA 490-F:3 (Supp. 2016) (granting circuit court jurisdiction conferred upon former judicial branch family division); In the Matter of O’Neil & O’Neil, 159 N.H. 615, 622 (2010).
  • State of New Hampshire v. Steven Laux 167 N.H. 698 N.H. 2015
    2012); cf. In the Matter of O’Neil & O’Neil, 159 N.H. 615, 622 (2010) (treating issue of whether family division had inherent power to issue restraining order to secure safety of its facilities and staff as a question of the court’s jurisdiction subject to de novo review).
  • In re Muller 62 A.3d 770 N.H. 2013
    “The ultimate determination as to whether the trial court has jurisdiction in this case is a question of law subject to de novo review.” In the Matter of O’Neil & O’Neil, 159 N.H. 615, 622 (2010).
  • Carleton, LLC v. Balagur 58 A.3d 673 N.H. 2012
    In the Matter of O’Neil & O’Neil, 159 N.H. 615, 624 (2010) (concluding that the issue of whether the family division had jurisdiction to order the sale of the respondent’s company was moot because the company was ultimately sold by the trustee pursuant to an order of the bankruptcy court).
  • In re Mallett 37 A.3d 333 N.H. 2012
    In the Matter of O’Neil & O’Neil, 159 N.H. 615, 622 (2010).
  • Holloway Automotive Group v. Lucic 35 A.3d 577 N.H. 2011
    “The ultimate determination as to whether the trial court ha[d] jurisdiction in this case is a question of law subject to de novo review.” In the Matter of O’Neil & O’Neil, 159 N.H. 615, 622 (2010).