Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite Appeal of Dean Foods, 969 A.2d 377.

16 citing documents.

  • Appeal of OL International Holdings, LLC N.H. 2023
    Appeal of Dean Foods, 158 N.H. 467, 474 (2009).
  • Appeal of Charles Welch N.H. 2023
    Appeal of Dean Foods, 158 N.H. 467, 471 (2009).
  • Appeal of Caitlyn Wittenauer N.H. 2022
    Appeal of Dean Foods, 158 N.H. 467, 471 (2009).
  • Appeal of James Lowry N.H. 2022
    Appeal of Dean Foods, 158 N.H. 467, 474 (2009).
  • Appeal of Pelmac Industries, Inc. N.H. 2021
    “[O]ur task is not to determine whether we would have found differently than did the [CAB], or to reweigh the evidence, but rather to determine whether the findings are supported by competent evidence in the record.” Appeal of Dean Foods, 158 N.H. 467, 474 (2009) (quotation omitted).
  • Appeal of Anthony Paquet N.H. 2021
    Appeal of Dean Foods, 158 N.H. 467, 474 (2009).
  • Appeal of Laura LeBorgne N.H. 2020
    able, necessary, and related to the work injury,” the only reason explicitly articulated within the CAB’s decision for denying the motion was: “The refusal of [petitioner’s] providers to complete and submit Worker’s Compensation Medical Forms is not good cause within the meaning of RSA 281-A:23 V.” 7 reweigh the evidence,” Appeal of Dean Foods, 158 N.H. 467, 474 (2009) (quotation omitted), the CAB’s own characterization of the evidence before it belies the respondent’s interpretation of the CAB’
  • Appeal of Raymond Cover 134 A.3d 433 N.H. 2016
    “We will overturn the [board’s] decision only for errors of law, or if we are satisfied by a clear preponderance of the evidence before us that the decision is unjust or unreasonable.” Appeal of Dean Foods, 158 N.H. 467, 471 (2009); see 5 RSA 541:13 (2007).
  • Appeal of Kathleen Burl-Cardin N.H. 2016
    Appeal of Dean Foods, 158 N.H. 467, 471 (2009).
  • Appeal of Robert C. Michele & a. 168 N.H. 98 N.H. 2015
    Appeal of Dean Foods, 158 N.H. 467, 471 (2009).
  • Appeal of Katherine Lajoie & a. N.H. 2015
    In reviewing those factual findings, “our task is not to determine whether we would have found differently than did the [Council], or to reweigh the evidence, but rather to determine whether the findings are supported by competent evidence in the record.” Appeal of Dean Foods, 158 N.H. 467, 474 (2009) (quotation omitted).
  • Appeal of Strafford County Sheriff's Office & a. 167 N.H. 115 N.H. 2014
    In reviewing the PELRB’s findings, “our task is not to determine whether we would have found differently than did the [PELRB], or to reweigh the evidence, but rather to determine whether the findings are supported by competent evidence in the record.” Appeal of Dean Foods, 158 N.H. 467, 474 (2009) (quotation omitted).
  • Appeal of Hillsborough County Nursing Home 166 N.H. 731 N.H. 2014
    Appeal of Dean Foods, 158 N.H. 467, 474 (2009).
  • Appeal of Phillips 165 N.H. 226 N.H. 2013
    In reviewing the CAB’s findings, “our task is not to determine whether we would have found differently than did the [CAB], or to reweigh the evidence, but rather to determine whether the findings are supported by competent evidence in the record.” Appeal of Dean Foods, 158 N.H. 467, 474 (2009) (quotation omitted).
  • Appeal of Langenfeld 993 A.2d 232 N.H. 2010
    Appeal of Dean Foods, 158 N.H. 467, 471 (2009); see RSA 541:13 (2007).
  • Appeal of Carnahan 993 A.2d 224 N.H. 2010
    “We will overturn the CAB’s decision only for errors of law, or if we are satisfied by a clear preponderance of the evidence before us that the decision is unjust or unreasonable.” Appeal of Dean Foods, 158 N.H. 467, 471 (2009).