Cited by
Opinions in New Hampshire that cite Appeal of Dean Foods, 969 A.2d 377.
-
Appeal of OL International Holdings, LLC
N.H. 2023
Appeal of Dean Foods, 158 N.H. 467, 474 (2009).
-
Appeal of Charles Welch
N.H. 2023
Appeal of Dean Foods, 158 N.H. 467, 471 (2009).
-
Appeal of Caitlyn Wittenauer
N.H. 2022
Appeal of Dean Foods, 158 N.H. 467, 471 (2009).
-
Appeal of James Lowry
N.H. 2022
Appeal of Dean Foods, 158 N.H. 467, 474 (2009).
-
Appeal of Pelmac Industries, Inc.
N.H. 2021
“[O]ur task is not to determine whether we would have found differently than did the [CAB], or to reweigh the evidence, but rather to determine whether the findings are supported by competent evidence in the record.” Appeal of Dean Foods, 158 N.H. 467, 474 (2009) (quotation omitted).
-
Appeal of Anthony Paquet
N.H. 2021
Appeal of Dean Foods, 158 N.H. 467, 474 (2009).
-
Appeal of Laura LeBorgne
N.H. 2020
able, necessary, and related to the work injury,” the only reason explicitly articulated within the CAB’s decision for denying the motion was: “The refusal of [petitioner’s] providers to complete and submit Worker’s Compensation Medical Forms is not good cause within the meaning of RSA 281-A:23 V.” 7 reweigh the evidence,” Appeal of Dean Foods, 158 N.H. 467, 474 (2009) (quotation omitted), the CAB’s own characterization of the evidence before it belies the respondent’s interpretation of the CAB’
-
Appeal of Raymond Cover
134 A.3d 433
N.H. 2016
“We will overturn the [board’s] decision only for errors of law, or if we are satisfied by a clear preponderance of the evidence before us that the decision is unjust or unreasonable.” Appeal of Dean Foods, 158 N.H. 467, 471 (2009); see 5 RSA 541:13 (2007).
-
Appeal of Kathleen Burl-Cardin
N.H. 2016
Appeal of Dean Foods, 158 N.H. 467, 471 (2009).
-
Appeal of Robert C. Michele & a.
168 N.H. 98
N.H. 2015
Appeal of Dean Foods, 158 N.H. 467, 471 (2009).
-
Appeal of Katherine Lajoie & a.
N.H. 2015
In reviewing those factual findings, “our task is not to determine whether we would have found differently than did the [Council], or to reweigh the evidence, but rather to determine whether the findings are supported by competent evidence in the record.” Appeal of Dean Foods, 158 N.H. 467, 474 (2009) (quotation omitted).
-
Appeal of Strafford County Sheriff's Office & a.
167 N.H. 115
N.H. 2014
In reviewing the PELRB’s findings, “our task is not to determine whether we would have found differently than did the [PELRB], or to reweigh the evidence, but rather to determine whether the findings are supported by competent evidence in the record.” Appeal of Dean Foods, 158 N.H. 467, 474 (2009) (quotation omitted).
-
Appeal of Hillsborough County Nursing Home
166 N.H. 731
N.H. 2014
Appeal of Dean Foods, 158 N.H. 467, 474 (2009).
-
Appeal of Phillips
165 N.H. 226
N.H. 2013
In reviewing the CAB’s findings, “our task is not to determine whether we would have found differently than did the [CAB], or to reweigh the evidence, but rather to determine whether the findings are supported by competent evidence in the record.” Appeal of Dean Foods, 158 N.H. 467, 474 (2009) (quotation omitted).
-
Appeal of Langenfeld
993 A.2d 232
N.H. 2010
Appeal of Dean Foods, 158 N.H. 467, 471 (2009); see RSA 541:13 (2007).
-
Appeal of Carnahan
993 A.2d 224
N.H. 2010
“We will overturn the CAB’s decision only for errors of law, or if we are satisfied by a clear preponderance of the evidence before us that the decision is unjust or unreasonable.” Appeal of Dean Foods, 158 N.H. 467, 471 (2009).