Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite In Re Mannion, 917 A.2d 1272.

19 citing documents.

In the Matter of David Campbell and Robin Partello N.H. 2025
In the Matter of Mannion & Mannion, 155 N.H. 52, 53, 55-56 (2007) (reviewing trial court’s allocation of decision-making responsibility between parents and finding no unsustainable exercise of discretion).
H.T. v. D.M. N.H. 2022
In the Matter of Mannion & Mannion, 155 N.H. 52, 54 (2007).
In the Matter of Kseniya Ausiaikova and Brian Meckel N.H. 2021
In the Matter of Mannion & Mannion, 155 N.H. 52, 54 (2007).
Joseph Kelly & a. v. Pine Trail Cottages Condominium Association & a. N.H. 2021
In the Matter of Mannion & Mannion, 155 N.H. 52, 54 (2007).
In the Matter of Christina Pangelinan and Jeffrey Nelson N.H. 2020
In the Matter of Mannion & Mannion, 155 N.H. 52, 55 (2007); RSA 461-A:5 (2018).
In the Matter of Brian Balch and Karen Balch N.H. 2019
In the Matter of Mannion & Mannion, 155 N.H. 52, 56 (2007).
Alexander J. Walker, Jr. v. Michael Gill & a. N.H. 2019
In the Matter of Mannion & Mannion, 155 N.H. 52, 54 (2007).
Allen Williamson v. Zen Braccio N.H. 2018
In the Matter of Mannion & Mannion, 155 N.H. 52, 54 (2007).
Deborah Cutler v. Daniel Knight & a. N.H. 2017
In the Matter of Mannion & Mannion, 155 N.H. 52, 54 (2007).
Dexter Cronin v. Town of Conway N.H. 2016
In the Matter of Mannion & Mannion, 155 N.H. 52, 54 (2007).
In the Matter of Jill Content and Edward Content N.H. 2016
In the Matter of Mannion & Mannion, 155 N.H. 52, 54 (2007).
In the Matter of Cheryl Bordeleau and Kevin Rocheville N.H. 2015
Assuming, without deciding, that the father preserved these issues for review, but see In the Matter of Mannion & Mannion, 155 N.H. 52, 54 (2007) (contemporaneous and specific objection is generally required to preserve an issue for appellate review), we cannot conclude based upon this record that the trial court unsustainably exercised its discretion in defaulting him.
In the Matter of Rebecca S. Ling and Richard J. Schaffer N.H. 2015
In the Matter of Mannion & Mannion, 155 N.H. 52, 55 (2007); RSA 461-A:6, I (Supp. 2014).
In the Matter of Dianne Haley and Joseph Haley, III N.H. 2015
In the Matter of Mannion & Mannion, 155 N.H. 52, 54 (2007) (stating generally contemporaneous and specific objection required to preserve issue for appellate review).
In the Matter of Michael Kurland and Jennifer Kurland N.H. 2015
“The general rule in this jurisdiction is that a contemporaneous and specific objection is required to preserve an issue for appellate review.” In the Matter of Mannion & Mannion, 155 N.H. 52, 54 (2007) (quotation omitted).
In re Henry 37 A.3d 320 N.H. 2012
‘While the testimony presented by the parties conflicted, the trial judge was in the best position to evaluate the evidence, measure its persuasiveness and assess the credibility of the witnesses.” In the Matter of Mannion & Mannion, 155 N.H. 52, 57 (2007).
In Re Martin 8 A.3d 60 N.H. 2010
In the Matter of Mannion & Mannion, 155 N.H. 52, 55 (2007).
In Re Salesky 958 A.2d 948 N.H. 2008
In the Matter of Mannion & Mannion, 155 N.H. 52, 56 (2007).
In Re Martel 944 A.2d 575 N.H. 2008
seriously to injure health or endanger reason.” To obtain a divorce on fault grounds under RSA 458:7, V, “the petitioner was required to show that: (1) the respondent so treated her as ‘seriously to injure health or endanger reason’ during the marriage, RSA 458:7, V; and (2) the respondent’s behavior was the primary cause of the breakdown of the marriage.” In the Matter of Mannion & Mannion, 155 N.H. 52, 56 (2007).

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by