Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite In Re Choy, 919 A.2d 801.

18 citing documents.

In the Matter of Taylor Coyne and Ashley Blanchfield N.H. 2025
In the Matter of Choy & Choy, 154 N.H. 707, 713 (2007).
In the Matter of Nicholas Flickner and Elizabeth Connors N.H. 2020
“Conflicts in the testimony, questions about the credibility of witnesses and the weight to be given testimony are for the trial court to resolve.” In the Matter of Choy & Choy, 154 N.H. 707, 713 (2007).
In the Matter of Sarah Pope and George Pope N.H. 2020
In the Matter of Choy & Choy, 154 N.H. 707, 714 (2007).
In the Matter of Sandra W. Hair and Sandra L. Hair & a. N.H. 2017
However, “it is not our role to calculate how much weight a trial court should accord specific evidence.” In the Matter of Choy & Choy, 154 N.H. 707, 714 (2007).
In the Matter of Eva Stilkey and Alexander Marsters N.H. 2017
“[I]t is not our role to calculate how much weight a trial court should accord specific evidence.” In the Matter of Choy & Choy, 154 N.H. 707, 714 (2007).
In the Matter of Robert Asipi and Melinda Diaz N.H. 2017
In the Matter of Choy & Choy, 154 N.H. 707, 713 (2007); In the Matter of Hennessey-Martin & Whitney, 151 N.H. 207, 212 (2004); see RSA 461-A:20 (Supp. 2016) (“Any provision of law that refers to the ‘custody’ of minor children shall mean the allocation of parental rights and responsibilities as provided in this chapter.”).
In the Matter of Nicholas Kelly and Astrid Fernandes-Prabhu 164 A.3d 379 N.H. 2017
“[W]e review only whether the record establishes an objective basis sufficient to sustain the discretionary judgment made,” and “we will not disturb the trial court’s determination if it could reasonably be made.” In the Matter of Choy & Choy, 154 N.H. 707, 713 (2007) (quotations omitted).
Elizabeth Skrekas & a. v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company & a. N.H. 2017
Wheeler’s hypothesis may have been misplaced, it was objectively reasonable at that time.” Although the plaintiffs fault the trial court for giving insufficient weight to the testimony of their expert, “it is not our role to calculate how much weight a trial court should accord specific evidence.” In the Matter of Choy & Choy, 154 N.H. 707, 714 (2007).
In the Matter of Aileen MacNaughton and Martin Robert N.H. 2016
In the Matter of Choy & Choy, 154 N.H. 707, 714 (2007).
In the Matter of Michael Kurland and Jennifer Kurland N.H. 2015
Accordingly, we note at the outset that “it is not our role to calculate how much weight a trial court should accord specific evidence.” In the Matter of Choy & Choy, 154 N.H. 707, 714 (2007).
Shelton v. Tamposi 62 A.3d 741 N.H. 2013
In the Matter of Choy & Choy, 154 N.H. 707, 714 (2007).
In re Name Change of Goudreau 55 A.3d 1008 N.H. 2012
See, e.g., In the Matter of Choy & Choy, 154 N.H. 707, 713 (2007).
In Re Miller 20 A.3d 854 N.H. 2011
In the Matter of Choy & Choy, 154 N.H. 707, 713 (2007); see RSA 461-A:20 (Supp. 2010) (“Any provision of law that refers to the ‘custody* of minor children shall mean the allocation of parental rights and responsibilities as provided in this chapter.”).
In Re Kurowski 20 A.3d 306 N.H. 2011
In the Matter of Choy & Choy, 154 N.H. 707, 713 (2007) (decided under former statute); see also RSA 461-A:2,1(d) (Supp. 2010) (stating that purposes of RSA chapter 461-A include “[g]rant[ing]...
In Re Heinrich 7 A.3d 1158 N.H. 2010
“[T]he recommendations of a GAL do not, and should not, carry any greater presumptive weight than the other evidence in a case.” In the Matter of Choy & Choy, 154 N.H. 707, 714 (2007).
In Re Martin 8 A.3d 60 N.H. 2010
In the Matter of Choy & Choy, 154 N.H. 707, 711 (2007).
In Re Muchmore 986 A.2d 456 N.H. 2009
In the Matter of Choy & Choy, 154 N.H. 707, 711 (2007).
In Re Peirano 930 A.2d 1165 N.H. 2007
In the Matter of Choy & Choy, 154 N.H. 707, 713 (2007) (citations omitted).

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by