Cited by

See, e.g., State v. Santana, 133 N.H. 798, 804 (1991) (omitting the word “largely”); State v. Pseudae, 154 N.H. 196, 201 (2006) (comparing “facts of this case” to “the level of urgency demonstrated in previous cases” in a manner akin to de novo review).

I The following relevant facts are taken from the trial court’s order or from the suppression record.

The following facts are taken from the trial court’s order or from the suppression record.

I The following relevant facts are drawn from the trial court’s order on the defendant’s suppression motion and the suppression record.

State v. Pseudae, 154 N.H. 196, 201-02 (2006); see also Sutterfield, 751 F.3d at 557.

State v. Gonzalez, 143 N.H. 693, 697 (1999); accord State v. Pseudae, 154 N.H. 196, 200 (2006).

The State bears the burden of proving that an error is harmless.

An error is harmless only when it is determined, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the error did not affect the verdict.

The State bears the burden of proving that an error is harmless.

“The search of a home is subject to a particularly stringent warrant requirement because the occupant has a high expectation of privacy.” State v. Pseudae, 154 N.H. 196, 199 (2006).

When reviewing a trial court’s ruling on a motion to suppress, we accept the trial court’s findings unless they are unsupported by the record or clearly erroneous.

Under Part I, Article 19 of our State Constitution, warrantless entries are per se unreasonable and illegal unless they fall within the narrow confines of a judicially crafted exception to the warrant requirement.

An error is harmless only if it is determined, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the verdict was not affected by the error.

The record before us simply does not support such a finding.

It is well settled that an error is harmless only if it is determined, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the verdict was not affected by the error.

In making this determination, we consider the alternative evidence presented at trial as well as the character of the inadmissible evidence itself.