Cited by

Likewise, “[w]hen there is a disputed question of fact as to the existence and terms of a contract, [the question] is to be determined by the trier of fact.” Syncom Indus.

v. Wood, 155 N.H. 73, 82 (2007); C & M Realty Trust v. Wiedenkeller, 133 N.H. 470, 477 (1990).

v. Wood, 155 N.H. 73, 82-83 (2007) (finding contract unenforceable where there was no meeting of the minds on an essential term).

The question of whether a meeting of the minds has occurred is analyzed under an objective standard and is a question of fact.

We defer to the trial court’s judgment on such issues as resolving conflicts in the testimony, measuring the credibility of witnesses, and determining the weight to be given evidence.

“An anticipatory breach of contract occurs when a promising party repudiates his obligations either through words or by voluntarily disabling himself from performing them before the time for performance.” Syncom Indus.