Cited by

Co., 153 N.H. 498, 501-02 (2006) (explaining that there must be a meeting of the minds on all essential terms in order to form a valid contract).

Co., 153 N.H. 498, 500 (2006); Appeal of Alton School Dist., 140 N.H. at 306.

Co., 153 N.H. 498, 504 (2006) (noting that a trial court may consider parol evidence in interpreting ambiguous terms).

Co., 153 N.H. 498, 503-04 (2006) (stating that extrinsic evidence may be used to interpret ambiguous contract terms but — absent ambiguity — the parties’ intent will be determined from the plain meaning of the language used in the contract).

Co., 153 N.H. 498, 503 (2006) (“A clause of an agreement is ambiguous when the contracting parties reasonably differ as to its meaning.” (emphasis added)).

Co., 153 N.H. 498, 500-01 (2006) (We will sustain the trial court’s findings if they are supported by the record.).

“Offer, acceptance, and consideration are essential to contract formation.” Behrens v. S.P Constr.