DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite In re Adam M., 802 A.2d 1218.

14 citing documents.

  • In re J.H. N.H. 2023
    Parental responsibilities come in many forms, including providing for the child’s physical and emotional needs.
  • In re Estate of Natalia Brodeur N.H. 2023
    Under this standard of review, our task on appeal is not to determine whether we would have found differently; rather, we determine whether a reasonable person could have found as the trial judge did.
  • In re G.B. N.H. 2021
    Although some parental obligations may be discharged by delegation, see In re Adam M., 148 N.H. 83, 84 (2002), “[c]aring for a child’s emotional well-being” requires a parent’s “active involvement,” In re Thomas M., 141 N.H. 55, 58 (1996).
  • Richard E. Clark, Esq. v. Ryan Carrier & a. N.H. 2021
    Our task on appeal is not to determine whether we would have found differently; rather, we determine whether a reasonable person could have found as the trial judge did.
  • Seacoast Helicopters, LLC v. Kevin Beaulieu N.H. 2020
    Our task on appeal is not to determine whether we would have found differently; rather, we determine whether a reasonable person could have found as the trial judge did.
  • Seacoast Helicopters, LLC v. Kevin Beaulieu N.H. 2019
    Our task on appeal is not to determine whether we would have found differently; rather, we determine whether a reasonable person could have found as the trial judge did.
  • Lancelot Court Condominium Association v. Judith Tompson N.H. 2016
    Our task on appeal is not to determine whether we would have found differently; rather, we determine whether a reasonable person could have found as the trial judge did.
  • Thomas M. Benoit & a. v. Joseph A. Cerasaro, Trustee of the Joseph A. Cerasaro Revocable Trust & … 139 A.3d 1134 N.H. 2016
  • In the Matter of Marianna Nizhnikov and Alexander Nizhnikov 132 A.3d 412 N.H. 2016
    However, she fails to cite where she raised this argument before the trial court, and, therefore, we decline to consider it.
  • State v. Samuel Pennock 168 N.H. 294 N.H. 2015
  • In re Haley K. 37 A.3d 377 N.H. 2012
    Cf, e.g., In re Adam M., 148 N.H. 83, 85 (2002) (parental responsibilities include provision for child’s physical needs, including food, clothing, medical care and a domicile).
  • In Re Huff 969 A.2d 428 N.H. 2009
    In re Adam M., 148 N.H. 83, 85 (2002) (“Although [father’s] efforts to maintain contact with his child are commendable, the fact still remains that the child has been and will be without his father’s care during most of his formative years as a result of his father’s criminal behavior.”).
  • In Re Juvenile 2005-426 910 A.2d 1240 N.H. 2006
    *339 We will uphold the rulings and findings of the trial court unless they are unsupported by the evidence or tainted by error of law.
  • Thompson v. C&C Research & Development, LLC 898 A.2d 495 N.H. 2006
    “[A]s the trier of fact, the trial court is in the best position to assess and weigh the evidence before it because it has the benefit of observing the parties and their witnesses.” In re Adam M., 148 N.H. 83, 84 (2002).