| No. 91-230 |
N.H. |
1993-03-11 |
—
|
State v. Brinkman
|
|
… pretrial proceedings for the first trial, the defendant raised due process and Miranda issues. Both issues were decided against the defendant. At the second trial, the defendant raised the Miranda issue, but did not raise the due process i …
|
| No. 90-324 |
N.H. |
1992-04-16 |
—
|
State v. Laurie
|
|
… time at the Franklin police station. The officers informed the defendant of his Miranda rights. The defendant indicated that he understood his rights, signed a waiver form, and agreed to talk. The interview began at 5:34 p.m. The defendant …
|
| No. 91-136 |
N.H. |
1992-04-02 |
—
|
State v. Osgood
|
|
… d as an habitual offender and placed him under arrest. Later, after waiving his Miranda rights at the police station, the defendant admitted to Officer Roberts that he had recently been certified an habitual offender and told not to drive. …
|
| No. 90-348 |
N.H. |
1992-03-25 |
—
|
State v. Guajardo
|
|
… police station, the defendant was advised of “what he was there for” and of his Miranda rights. The defendant requested the assistance of counsel and indicated that he did not want to say anything. Subsequently, while at a local hospital fo …
|
| No. 90-281 |
N.H. |
1992-03-20 |
—
|
State v. Chapman
|
|
… evidence, arguing that the evidence was obtained in violation of the holding in Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966), and both the State and Federal Constitutions. The evidence was introduced at trial, and the jury convicted the defendan …
|
| No. 89-283 |
N.H. |
1991-12-31 |
—
|
State v. Gravel
|
|
… rival at the station, the defendant was given the standard warnings required by Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966). He was then “processed” and given a test to determine his blood alcohol content. The results of the blood test showed a …
|
| No. 90-297 |
N.H. |
1991-12-11 |
—
|
State v. Hurlburt
|
|
… efendant was a felon; (2) admitting statements made in violation of defendant’s Miranda rights; (3) sentencing defendant to a greater period of incarceration at the retrial than had been given at the first trial; and (4) finding that the ex …
|
| No. 90-287 |
N.H. |
1991-11-07 |
—
|
State v. Ellison
|
|
… looking for him, arrived at the police station and gave a statement following a Miranda waiver. He denied having been at his wife’s home the day before, claiming that he had last had sexual intercourse with her the previous September. He ga …
|
| No. 90-141 |
N.H. |
1991-05-06 |
—
|
Zyla v. Turner
|
|
… ield sobriety tests, all of which he failed. Zyla was arrested, informed of his Miranda rights and taken to the police station. For reasons immaterial to this appeal, the police did not request Zyla to consent to a chemical blood analysis, …
|
| No. 89-399 |
N.H. |
1991-04-23 |
—
|
State v. Eldridge
|
|
… of hollow point bullets. , Sergeant Schwatka then advised the defendant of his Miranda rights, utilizing a standard form, and the defendant noted his understanding of each right. The defendant then read aloud the rights, voiced his underst …
|
| No. 89-395 |
N.H. |
1990-12-28 |
—
|
State v. Zurita
|
|
… not support the court’s finding that he knowingly and intelligently waived his Miranda rights prior to making the statements. See Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966). We affirm. The defendant was arrested by a Nashua police officer in …
|
| No. 89-020 |
N.H. |
1990-10-17 |
—
|
State v. Collins
|
|
… ; State v. Gullick, 118 N.H. 912, 915 , 396 A.2d 554, 555 (1978) (to show post -Miranda waiver); State v. Phinney, 117 N.H. 145, 146 , 370 A.2d 1153, 1153 (1977) (to show voluntariness of statement); State v. Slade, 116 N.H. 436, 437 , 362 …
|
| No. 89-341 |
N.H. |
1990-08-01 |
—
|
State v. Bousquet
|
|
… except when doctrinal developments indicate otherwise.’” Id. (quoting Hicks v. Miranda, 422 U.S. 332, 344 (1975)). The court then considered whether Edwards v. Arizona, 451 U.S. 477 (1981), represented such a new doctrinal development. Edw …
|
| No. 89-113 |
N.H. |
1990-07-18 |
—
|
State v. Plante
|
|
… ement after finding that he knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently waived his Miranda rights; and (2) that the indictments were insufficient to charge him with either offense. We affirm. The facts are as follows. On the morning of Novembe …
|
| No. 89-151 |
N.H. |
1990-05-24 |
—
|
State v. Green
|
|
… t any time if that’s what you mean and/or he was advised of what’s known as the Miranda Rights. Q. What did you tell him about the fact he could leave at any time? A. Well, basically the fact that being in under protective custody, as far a …
|
| No. 88-218 |
N.H. |
1990-01-31 |
—
|
State v. Fecteau
|
|
… es on appeal that the police failed to give him all the warnings required under Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966), and that his incriminating statements should have be'en suppressed. The sole issue we address under the Federal Constit …
|
| No. 89-129 |
N.H. |
1989-12-29 |
—
|
State v. Dandurant
|
|
… age at the time she admitted her role in the crime, she was given the standard Miranda warnings, rather than the juvenile warnings under State v. Benoit, 126 N.H. 6 , 490 A.2d 295 (1985). During a pre-trial suppression hearing before the T …
|
| No. 87-506 |
N.H. |
1989-10-06 |
—
|
State v. Dedrick
|
|
… hat enunciated elsewhere in that opinion, id. at 439 (“safeguards prescribed by Miranda become applicable as soon as a suspect’s freedom of action is curtailed to a ‘degree associated with formal arrest’” (quoting California v. Beheler, 463 …
|
| No. 88-084 |
N.H. |
1989-08-16 |
—
|
State v. Carpentier
|
|
… ged with an offense, he was a possible homicide suspect. They then read him his Miranda rights and took a statement. Officers contacted Carpentier again in January 1986 and, with his agreement, made arrangements for him to provide them with …
|
| No. 88-196 |
N.H. |
1989-08-16 |
—
|
State v. Turmelle
|
|
… , /s/ Monique Turmelle.” The police arrested the defendant, informed her of her Miranda rights, and transported her to the Dover police station. A police officer testified that during the booking procedure, the defendant stated to him that …
|
| No. 88-190 |
N.H. |
1989-07-14 |
—
|
State v. Rathbun
|
|
… his attempt to flee on foot. It could be found that an Officer Wright read the Miranda warnings to him in a police cruiser, although there is no evidence that the defendant waived any rights. He was not questioned in the cruiser and made n …
|
| No. 88-174 |
N.H. |
1989-07-13 |
—
|
State v. Derby
|
|
… l that the Superior Court (Morrill, J.) erred in finding his apparent waiver of Miranda rights valid beyond a reasonable doubt. We affirm. After the defendant’s ten-year-old stepdaughter told a social worker on June 16, 1987, that the defen …
|
| No. 87-060 |
N.H. |
1989-04-07 |
—
|
State v. Roberts
|
|
… of the defendant’s brother’s home, Trooper Van Dam advised the defendant of his Miranda rights, and the defendant stated that he wished to call his attorney. The defendant tried to call his attorney three times but was unable to reach him. …
|
| No. 87-380 |
N.H. |
1989-04-07 |
—
|
State v. Tucker
|
|
… t replied that he had been the pilot. Trooper Hamel then read the defendant his Miranda rights. The defendant orally waived his rights, and Trooper Hamel proceeded to question the defendant, eliciting incriminating statements from him. Duri …
|
| No. 88-248 |
N.H. |
1989-03-06 |
—
|
State v. McDermott
|
|
… McDermott on the details of the shooting. Mattioli told McDermott that without ‘Miranda warnings’ his statements would not be used against him and that nothing would be done with his statements. McDermott proceeded to reveal the details of …
|
| No. 88-050 |
N.H. |
1988-12-30 |
—
|
State v. Gigas
|
|
… at the Dover police station, Lefebvre asked to speak to a detective, waived his Miranda rights, and revealed that he had received the cocaine from the defendant at the Partridge Green residence of Charles Drew and Ronald English. Lefebvre r …
|
| No. 87-105 |
N.H. |
1988-12-12 |
—
|
State v. Sundstrom
|
|
… t the scene, Officer King informed Sundstrom of his constitutional rights under Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966), although the defendant had indicated that he was already aware of them. The defendant stated that he understood his rig …
|
| No. 85-131; No. 86-387 |
N.H. |
1988-12-09 |
—
|
State v. Bruneau
|
|
… After the defendant’s arrest in Florida, he invoked his right to counsel under Miranda and did not thereafter initiate conversation with the police. See Edwards v. Arizona, 451 U.S. 477, 484-85 (1981). Upon his return to Concord, detective …
|
| No. 87-175 |
N.H. |
1988-08-10 |
—
|
State v. Chaloux
|
|
… spatcher advised that a wallet had been taken in the robbery, the officers gave Miranda warnings to the passengers and questioned them about the picture holder. Each denied owning it. When Kelley returned to the other officers, he told Guer …
|
| No. 87-112 |
N.H. |
1988-05-06 |
—
|
In re Sanborn
|
|
… rsation, although shortly thereafter one of the officers read and explained the Miranda warnings. The respondent indicated that he understood his rights but “wantfed] to tell the truth so [he could] feel better about what [he had] done.” He …
|
| No. 86-527 |
N.H. |
1988-03-10 |
—
|
State v. Torres
|
|
… e Sergeant Henry Carpenito testified that he read Torres his rights pursuant to Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966), asked him whether he understood those rights, and asked whether he understood English. Torres responded affirmatively t …
|
| No. 86-451 |
N.H. |
1987-12-31 |
—
|
State v. Denney
|
|
… him under arrest for driving while intoxicated. En route to the police station, Miranda warnings were administered, and, as is required by statute (RSA 265:87), the defendant was advised of his rights under RSA 265:87 and the “consequences …
|
| No. 87-004 |
N.H. |
1987-12-07 |
—
|
State v. Coppola
|
|
… m impeaching a defendant with evidence that he remained silent after arrest and Miranda warnings. The Court reasoned that such silence is insolubly ambiguous and arguably responsive to the assurance implicit in the warnings, that a choice t …
|
| No. 86-442 |
N.H. |
1987-11-05 |
—
|
State v. Sullivan
|
|
… im at approximately 4:20 a.m. in the detective’s office. The detective read the Miranda rights to him, and the defendant read the rights as printed on a form, and initialled them to indicate he understood them. *67 When asked if he would si …
|
| No. 86-355 |
N.H. |
1987-10-15 |
—
|
State v. Pierce
|
|
… on to suppress a confession on the ground that it was “obtained contrary to his Miranda rights, including the right against self-incrimination.” We affirm. On February 12, 1985, the defendant, wearing a ski mask, unlawfully entered two girl …
|
| No. 87-083 |
N.H. |
1987-10-15 |
—
|
State v. Vachon
|
|
… just kissed her.” Later, at the police department, upon effective waiver of his Miranda rights, he signed an incriminating three-page statement. The defendant argued at the suppression hearing, and it is his sole contention here, that the s …
|
| No. 86-342 |
N.H. |
1987-10-09 |
—
|
State v. Lewis
|
|
… rulings: (1) the determination that the defendant voluntarily waived applicable Miranda rights before confessing; (2) the rejection of his claim that admitting his confession obtained through police interrogation infringed State guarantees …
|
| No. 86-084 |
N.H. |
1987-10-09 |
—
|
State v. Duff
|
|
… the defendant, Robert Duff. They asked Duff to step outside, advised him of his Miranda rights, and asked him to come to the station for questioning. Once at the station, Duff denied any involvement in the rape committed earlier that evenin …
|
| No. 86-178 |
N.H. |
1987-06-03 |
—
|
State v. Cote
|
|
… stion him regarding sexual misconduct. *363 Officer Ryan gave the defendant his Miranda warnings, and offered to leave if the defendant wished him to do so. The defendant, who was unrepresented by counsel at the time, allowed Officer Ryan t …
|
| No. 85-287 |
N.H. |
1986-12-05 |
—
|
State v. Wood
|
|
… :1, and aggravated felonious sexual assault, RSA 632-A:2. He was advised of his Miranda rights both before and after he was transported to the police station. While at the station, the defendant informed Officer Brochu that he understood hi …
|
| No. 85-120 |
N.H. |
1986-10-03 |
—
|
State v. Brown
|
|
… hts by the admission of evidence indicating that in the period after receipt of Miranda warnings he failed to apologize to the victim for injuring him; (2) erroneous instructions on the requisite state of mind for attempted murder and on th …
|
| No. 85-229 |
N.H. |
1986-10-03 |
—
|
State v. Dellorfano
|
|
… tion to the admission of certain statements made to the police before and after Miranda warnings. This ruling, and the court’s failure to give a particular accomplice testimony instruction, are challenged on appeal. For the reasons that fol …
|
| No. 84-555 |
N.H. |
1986-10-03 |
—
|
State v. Kilgus
|
|
… , 303-04 (1966). Nor was Kilgus entitled to be given the warnings called for in Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966), prior to his discussion with police informer Chasse. Suspects in criminal cases are entitled to Miranda warnings only p …
|
| No. 85-313 |
N.H. |
1986-10-02 |
—
|
State v. Lescard
|
|
… by the defendant after his arrest, but prior to the time he was advised of his Miranda rights. We find no error and affirm. On April 8, 1984, the defendant was involved in a fatal car accident. Observers at the scene, including police offi …
|
| No. 85-202 |
N.H. |
1986-07-17 |
—
|
State v. Greene
|
|
… was under arrest for violating RSA 265:82 (Supp. 1985) and informed her of her Miranda and implied consent rights. The defendant testified that she requested an opportunity to speak with her attorney after her arrest. She was advised by th …
|
| No. 85-153 |
N.H. |
1986-07-09 |
—
|
State v. Goding
|
|
… e RSA 265:84 et seq. (1982 and Supp. 1985), should have been suppressed because Miranda warnings had not yet been given; and (3) we should adopt a rule that once a defendant is in custody, implied consent law questioning must be preceded by …
|
| No. 85-377 |
N.H. |
1986-06-05 |
—
|
State v. Duhamel
|
|
… alf an hour, after sitting in that cruiser with handcuffs on, after having your Miranda rights read to you, you finally said something, didn’t you? Similar to what you told the jury today, is that right? A. That’s correct. Q. One phrase? A. …
|
| No. 84-532 |
N.H. |
1986-05-09 |
—
|
State v. Stiles
|
|
… der arrest, she was taken to the Portsmouth police station, where she was given Miranda warnings and questioned. Fields stated that she lived with the defendant at 1527-Islington Street in Portsmouth and revealed that he kept cocaine in a b …
|
| No. 85-076 |
N.H. |
1986-03-03 |
—
|
In re Allen R.
|
|
… ring, defense counsel moved for approval to hire a psychologist as an expert on Miranda issues and to hire a court reporter, each at public expense because of the juvenile’s indigence. See RSA 604-A:6 (Supp. 1983). Although the parties disa …
|
| No. 84-383 |
N.H. |
1985-12-04 |
—
|
State v. Oxley
|
|
… ich the furniture had allegedly been sold. Officer Moore read the defendant his Miranda rights and then told the defendant that he didn’t believe his story. At that point, Officer Brian J. Fielding of the Manchester Police Department arrive …
|