cl-3570578
Precedential
Judgment for the plaintiff
Processed
Benton v. Goodale
Benton v. Goodale, 30 A. 1117 (Dec. 5, 1890).
Cited by
- Eaton v. Rivard 550 A.2d 107 N.H. 1988
- State v. Linsky 379 A.2d 813 N.H. 1977
Opinion text
Allen, J. The defendant was entitled to one dollar and no more “ for advertising ” all the lands included in a single advertisement, and the plaintiff was holden to pay no more than “ his just proportion ” of the defendant’s fees. G. L., c. 58, s. 15 ; c. 59, ss. 16, 17. The plaintiff’s payment of more than his share was not voluntary. He was compelled to pay what the defendant demanded to prevent a sale. An action of debt for the penalty prescribed by Gen. Laws, c. 59, s. 18, was not the only remedy. Cardigan v. Page, 6 N. H. 182, 193. Judgment for the plaintiff. Bingham, J., did not sit: the others concurred.