DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite In re Brooks, 678 A.2d 140.

14 citing documents.

  • Petition of K.S. 2024 N.H. 62 N.H. 2024
    Petition of Brooks, 140 N.H. 813, 816 (1996) (addressing petitioner’s claim “because it raises a significant constitutional issue”).
  • State of New Hampshire v. Justin Spirko N.H. 2024
    id.; Petition of Brooks, 140 N.H. 813, 816 (1996); Royer v. State Dep’t of Empl.
  • LD- In the Matter of Robert M. Fojo, Esquire N.H. 2022
    Petition of Brooks, 140 N.H. 813, 817 (1996); see also RSA 311:8 (2015); RSA 490:4 (2010).
  • Petition of Sanjeev Lath & a. 154 A.3d 1240 N.H. 2017
    II, art. 73-a, we have established an attorney discipline system to discharge our inherent and statutory authority to discipline attorneys, Petition of Brooks, 140 N.H. 813, 817 (1996); RSA 311:8 (2015); RSA 490:4 (2010); see also Sup.
  • In re N.B. In re J.B. 146 A.3d 146 N.H. 2016
    The order was triggered based upon the putative content of any future case or pleading that Cole may file against DCYF or CASA.
  • Sullivan v. Town of Hampton Board of Selectmen 917 A.2d 188 N.H. 2006
    The doctrine of mootness is designed to avoid deciding issues that “have become academic or dead.” Petition of Brooks, 140 N.H. 813, 816 (1996).
  • Bio Energy, LLC v. Town of Hopkinton 891 A.2d 509 N.H. 2005
    The doctrine of mootness is designed to avoid deciding issues that “have become academic or dead.” Petition of Brooks, 140 N.H. 813, 816 (1996) (quotation omitted).
  • Associated Press v. State 888 A.2d 1236 N.H. 2005
    Smith, 443 U.S. at 101-02; see also Petition of Brooks, 140 N.H. 813, 819 (1996).
  • HippoPress, LLC v. SMG 837 A.2d 347 N.H. 2003
    §] 1983.” The primary question for our review is whether the exclusive newspaper distribution contract between SMG and Union Leader violates HippoPress’ rights under Part I, Article 22 of the New Hampshire Constitution or the First Amendment of the United States Constitution, made applicable to the States by the Fourteenth Amendment, Petition of Brooks, 140 N.H. 813, 817 (1996).
  • State v. Gordon 809 A.2d 748 N.H. 2002
    We generally will refuse to review a question that no longer *579 presents a justiciable controversy because issues involved have become “academic or dead.” Petition of Brooks, 140 N.H. 813, 816 (1996).
  • In re Thayer 761 A.2d 1052 N.H. 2000
  • Bruzga's Case 712 A.2d 1078 N.H. 1998
    Ct. R. 37(1)(a); Petition of Brooks, 140 N.H. 813, 817, 678 A.2d 140, 142 (1996).
  • Appeal of Sutfin 693 A.2d 73 N.H. 1997
    II The respondent does not argue that the board’s decision violated his commercial speech rights under the State Constitution; consequently, we confine our analysis to “the first amendment to the Federal Constitution as applied to the States through the fourteenth amendment.” Petition of Brooks, 140 N.H. 813, 817, 678 A.2d 140, 142 (1996); see also Gitlow v. New York, 268 U.S. 652, 666 (1925).
  • Millette v. Warden, New Hampshire State Prison 692 A.2d 963 N.H. 1997
    “We generally will refuse to review a question that no longer presents a justiciable controversy because issues involved have become academic or dead.” Petition of Brooks, 140 N.H. 813, 816, 678 A.2d 140, 141-42 (1996) (quotation omitted).