DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite Town of Nottingham v. Newman, 785 A.2d 891.

58 citing documents.

  • State v. Lake Winnipesaukee Resort, LLC 977 A.2d 472 N.H. 2009
    Town of Nottingham v. Newman, 147 N.H. 131, 134-35 (2001); State v. Stow, 136 N.H. 598, 600, 602 (1993).
  • Bennett v. Town of Hampstead 953 A.2d 388 N.H. 2008
    Town of Nottingham v. Newman, 147 N.H. 131, 136 (2001).
  • Boynton v. Figueroa 913 A.2d 697 N.H. 2006
    “The purpose of this provision is to make civil remedies readily available, and to guard against arbitrary and discriminatory infringements on access to the courts.” Town of Nottingham v. Newman, 147 N.H. 131, 134-35 (2001) (quotation omitted).
  • WMUR Channel Nine v. NEW HAMPSHIRE DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME 908 A.2d 146 N.H. 2006
    Town of Nottingham v. Newman, 147 N.H. 131, 135 (2001) (addressing solely the defendants’ federal due process argument because they failed to invoke Part I, Article 15 of the New Hampshire Constitution).
  • City of Rochester v. Corpening 907 A.2d 383 N.H. 2006
    Town of Nottingham v. Newman, 147 N.H. 131, 134-35 (2001) (affirming trial court’s imposition of civil penalties pursuant to RSA 676:17,1(b) based upon a lower rate than that requested by the town after considering the defendants’ financial condition and the totality of the circumstances).
  • State v. City of Dover 891 A.2d 524 N.H. 2006
    “The purpose of this provision is to make civil remedies readily available and to guard against arbitrary and discriminatory infringements on access to the courts.” Town of Nottingham v. Newman, 147 N.H. 131, 134-35 (2001) (quotation omitted).
  • Sherryland, Inc. v. Snuffer 837 A.2d 316 N.H. 2003
    Town of Nottingham v. Newman, 147 N.H. 131, 134-35 (2001).
  • Grenier v. Barclay Square Commercial Condominium Owners' Ass'n 834 A.2d 238 N.H. 2003
    “A prevailing party may be awarded attorney’s fees when that recovery is authorized by statute, an agreement between the parties, or an established judicial exception to the general rule that precludes recovery of such fees.” Town of Nottingham v. Newman, 147 N.H. 131, 137 (2001) (quotation omitted).