Cited by

Star Vector Corp. v. Town of Windham, 146 N.H. 490, 493 (2001).

the grade was not a safety issue,” and “questioned the health and safety of the sight lines from the proposed driveway.” Accordingly, we agree with the Town that “[g]iven the nature of the expected traffic at a self- storage facility, and the projected capabilities of drivers, it was entirely reasonable for the Planning Board not to approve a 10% slope.” See Star Vector Corp. v. Town of Windham, 146 N.H. 490, 493 (2001) (explaining that if any of the reasons offered by the Board to reject a site

We review the trial court’s decision to determine whether “a reasonable person could have reached the same decision as the trial court based on the evidence before it.” Star Vector Corp. v. Town of Windham, 146 N.H. 490, 493 (2001) (quotation omitted).

See, e.g., Star Vector Corp. v. Town of Windham, 146 N.H. 490, 494 (2001) (planning board issued detailed denial letter which provided multiple reasons for disapproval, and minutes reflected board’s specific concern with applicant’s proposed control regarding release of hazardous substance); K & P, Inc., 133 N.H. at 288 (planning board issued general denial letter, but minut

Star Vector Corp. v. Town of Windham, 146 N.H. 490, 493 (2001).

“We require issues to be raised at the earliest possible time, because trial forums should have a full opportunity to come to sound conclusions and to correct errors in the first instance.” Star Vector Corp. v. Town of Windham, 146 N.H. 490, 494 (2001) (quotation omitted).

RSA 677:15, III entitles the trial court “at its discretion, to consider additional evidence when it shall appear necessary.” Star Vector Corp. v. Town of Windham, 146 N.H. 490, 492 (2001) (quotation omitted).

Star Vector Corp. v. Town of Windham, 146 N.H. 490, 492-93 (2001); Burke v. Town of Jaffrey, 122 N.H. 510, 513 (1982).

Star Vector Corp. v. Town of Windham, 146 N.H. 490, 492-93 (2001).

Star Vector Corp. v. Town of Windham, 146 N.H. 490, 493 (2001).

§ 2; see also Star Vector Corp. v. Town of Windham, 146 N.H. 490, 494 (2001) (requiring parties to raise issues at *623 earliest possible time to allow trial forums the full opportunity to come to sound conclusions and to correct errors of law).

*332 When a trial court’s review of the selectmen’s decision is appealed, we will “uphold the trial court unless its decision is not supported by the evidence or is legally erroneous.” Star Vector Corp. v. Town of Windham, 146 N.H. 490, 493 (2001).

Star Vector Corp. v. Town of Windham, 146 N.H. 490, 494 (2001); cf. Appeal of Cheney, 130 N.H. at 594 (plaintiff barred from predicating error upon objection she never made at council hearing).