DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite Webster v. Town of Candia, 778 A.2d 402.

13 citing documents.

  • Mark Brighton & a. v. City of Portsmouth N.H. 2020
    Webster v. Town of Candia, 146 N.H. 430, 441-42 (2001) (stating that it is the plaintiff’s burden to rebut presumption that planning board members are unbiased).
  • Clearview Software International, Inc. v. Paul R. Kfoury, Sr., Esq. N.H. 2016
    v. Municipality of Conway, 144 N.H. 642, 654-55 (2000); see also Webster v. Town of Candia, 146 N.H. 430, 445 (2001).
  • Bleiler v. Chief, Dover Police Department 927 A.2d 1216 N.H. 2007
    Contrary to the petitioner’s assertions, “[a] law is not necessarily vague because it does not precisely apprise [an individual] of the standards by which [a permitting authority] will make its decision.” Webster v. Town of *703 Candia, 146 N.H. 430, 435 (2001) (quotations and brackets omitted).
  • Broom v. Continental Casualty Co. 887 A.2d 1128 N.H. 2005
    Webster v. Town of Candia, 146 N.H. 430, 444 (2001).
  • Pennichuck Corp. v. City of Nashua 886 A.2d 1014 N.H. 2005
    Webster v. Town of Candia, 146 N.H. 430, 434 (2001).
  • Taylor v. Town of Plaistow 872 A.2d 769 N.H. 2005
    Webster v. Town of Candia, 146 N.H. 430, 434 (2001).
  • Hughes v. New Hampshire Division of Aeronautics 871 A.2d 18 N.H. 2005
    Webster v. Town of Candia, 146 N.H. 430, 434 (2001).
  • Arcidi v. Town of Rye 846 A.2d 535 N.H. 2004
    Webster v. Town of Candia, 146 N.H. 430, 438 (2001).
  • State v. Bortner 841 A.2d 80 N.H. 2004
    Webster v. Town of Candia, 146 N.H. 430, 434 (2001).
  • Bayson Properties, Inc. v. City of Lebanon 834 A.2d 202 N.H. 2003
    “The purpose of the statutory provisions for the receipt of additional evidence is not to afford the appealing party a trial de novo, which is no longer available, but rather to assist the court in evaluating the action of the board.” Webster v. Town of Candia, 146 N.H. 430, 443 (2001) (quotation and ellipsis omitted).
  • In re Breault 821 A.2d 1118 N.H. 2003
    “A motion for reconsideration allows a party to present points of law or fact that the Court has overlooked or misapprehended.” Webster v. Town of Candia, 146 N.H. 430, 444 (2001) (quotation omitted).
  • Robinson v. Town of Hudson 821 A.2d 959 N.H. 2003
    The trial court is in the best position to determine the sufficiency of the record before it.” Webster v. Town of Candia, 146 N.H. 430, 443 (2001) (citation and quotations omitted).
  • Dow v. Town of Effingham 803 A.2d 1059 N.H. 2002
    “A law is not necessarily vague because it does not precisely apprise an applicant of the standards by which an administrative board will make its decision.” Webster v. Town of Candia, 146 N.H. 430, 435 (2001) (quotations and brackets omitted).