Cited by
Opinions in New Hampshire that cite Appeal of Estate of Van Lunen, 750 A.2d 737.
-
Krainewood Shores Association, Inc. & a. v. Town of Moultonborough & a.
N.H. 2021
Appeal of Estate of Van Lunen, 145 N.H. 82, 86 (2000).
-
Maplevale Builders, LLC v. Town of Danville
70 A.3d 427
N.H. 2013
RSA 79-A:5; see also Appeal of Estate of Van Lunen, 145 N.H. 82, 86 (2000).
-
Appeal of City of Concord
13 A.3d 287
N.H. 2010
In Appeal of Estate of Van Lunen, 145 N.H. 82, 86 (2000), we stated: “The statutory deadlines for requesting a tax abatement under RSA chapter 76 and its predecessor have historically been strictly enforced, and failure to timely submit an appeal is fatal regardless of accident, mistake, or misfortune.” (Citations omitted.)
-
Formula Development Corp. v. Town of Chester
934 A.2d 504
N.H. 2007
Appeal of Estate of Van Lunen, 145 N.H. 82, 86 (2000).
-
Woodview Development Corp. v. Town of Pelham
871 A.2d 58
N.H. 2005
Nor was the board’s action barred by our decision in Appeal of Estate of Van Lunen, 145 N.H. 82, 88-89 (2000).
-
Franklin v. Town of Newport
861 A.2d 777
N.H. 2004
Appeal of Estate of Van Lunen, 145 N.H. 82, 86 (2000).
-
Franklin Lodge v. Marcoux
825 A.2d 480
N.H. 2003
Appeal of Estate of Van Lunen, 145 N.H. 82, 86 (2000).
-
Appeal of Home
816 A.2d 944
N.H. 2003
The failure to file a timely appeal “is fatal regardless of accident, mistake, or misfortune.” Appeal of Estate of Van Lunen, 145 N.H. 82, 86 (2000); see Appeal of Roketenetz, 122 N.H. 869, 870 (1982) (affirming BTLA’s dismissal of appeal of selectmen’s refusal to act on abatement request, even though appeal was only five days late).
-
Monahan-Fortin Properties, LLC v. Town of Hudson
813 A.2d 523
N.H. 2002
Appeal of Estate of Van Lunen, 145 N.H. 82, 86 (2000).
-
In re Estate of Locke
813 A.2d 1172
N.H. 2002
Appeal of Estate of Van Lunen, 145 N.H. 82, 86 (2000).
-
Allen v. State
785 A.2d 901
N.H. 2001
When construing its meaning[,] we first examine the language found in the statute, and where possible, we ascribe the plain and ordinary meanings to words used.” Appeal of Estate of Van Lunen, 145 N.H. 82, 86 (2000) (quotation and brackets omitted).
-
Handley v. Town of Hooksett
785 A.2d 399
N.H. 2001
Appeal of Van Lunen, 145 N.H. 82, 86 (2000).
-
State v. Burr
782 A.2d 914
N.H. 2001
When construing its meaning[,] we first examine the language found in the statute, and where possible, we ascribe the plain and ordinary meanings to words used.” Appeal of Estate of Van Lunen, 145 N.H. 82, 85 (2000) (quotation and brackets omitted).
-
Trachy v. LaFramboise
770 A.2d 1097
N.H. 2001
Appeal of Van Lunen, 145 N.H. 82, 86 (2000) (quotation, brackets and citation omitted).
-
Carter v. Lachance
766 A.2d 717
N.H. 2001
When construing its meaning we first examine the language found in the statute, and where possible, we ascribe the plain and ordinary meanings to words used.” Appeal of Van Lunen, 145 N.H. 82, 86 (2000) (quotations, brackets, and ellipsis omitted).
-
Tyler Road Development Corp. v. Town of Londonderry
766 A.2d 267
N.H. 2000
When construing its meaning we *619 first examine the language found in the statute, and where possible, we ascribe the plain and ordinary meanings to words.” Appeal of Van Lumen, 145 N.H. 82, 86, 750 A.2d 737, 740 (2000).
-
Fowler v. Town of Seabrook
765 A.2d 146
N.H. 2000
Appeal of Estate of Van Lunen, 145 N.H. 82, 86, 750 A.2d 737, 740 (2000) (quotation, brackets, and citation omitted).
-
McKenzie v. City of Berlin
767 A.2d 396
N.H. 2000
Appeal of Estate of Van Lunen, 145 N.H. 82, 86, 750 A.2d 737, 740 (2000) (quotation, brackets, and citation omitted).