Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite Appeal of Estate of Van Lunen, 750 A.2d 737.

18 citing documents.

  • Krainewood Shores Association, Inc. & a. v. Town of Moultonborough & a. N.H. 2021
    Appeal of Estate of Van Lunen, 145 N.H. 82, 86 (2000).
  • Maplevale Builders, LLC v. Town of Danville 70 A.3d 427 N.H. 2013
    RSA 79-A:5; see also Appeal of Estate of Van Lunen, 145 N.H. 82, 86 (2000).
  • Appeal of City of Concord 13 A.3d 287 N.H. 2010
    In Appeal of Estate of Van Lunen, 145 N.H. 82, 86 (2000), we stated: “The statutory deadlines for requesting a tax abatement under RSA chapter 76 and its predecessor have historically been strictly enforced, and failure to timely submit an appeal is fatal regardless of accident, mistake, or misfortune.” (Citations omitted.)
  • Formula Development Corp. v. Town of Chester 934 A.2d 504 N.H. 2007
    Appeal of Estate of Van Lunen, 145 N.H. 82, 86 (2000).
  • Woodview Development Corp. v. Town of Pelham 871 A.2d 58 N.H. 2005
    Nor was the board’s action barred by our decision in Appeal of Estate of Van Lunen, 145 N.H. 82, 88-89 (2000).
  • Franklin v. Town of Newport 861 A.2d 777 N.H. 2004
    Appeal of Estate of Van Lunen, 145 N.H. 82, 86 (2000).
  • Franklin Lodge v. Marcoux 825 A.2d 480 N.H. 2003
    Appeal of Estate of Van Lunen, 145 N.H. 82, 86 (2000).
  • Appeal of Home 816 A.2d 944 N.H. 2003
    The failure to file a timely appeal “is fatal regardless of accident, mistake, or misfortune.” Appeal of Estate of Van Lunen, 145 N.H. 82, 86 (2000); see Appeal of Roketenetz, 122 N.H. 869, 870 (1982) (affirming BTLA’s dismissal of appeal of selectmen’s refusal to act on abatement request, even though appeal was only five days late).
  • Monahan-Fortin Properties, LLC v. Town of Hudson 813 A.2d 523 N.H. 2002
    Appeal of Estate of Van Lunen, 145 N.H. 82, 86 (2000).
  • In re Estate of Locke 813 A.2d 1172 N.H. 2002
    Appeal of Estate of Van Lunen, 145 N.H. 82, 86 (2000).
  • Allen v. State 785 A.2d 901 N.H. 2001
    When construing its meaning[,] we first examine the language found in the statute, and where possible, we ascribe the plain and ordinary meanings to words used.” Appeal of Estate of Van Lunen, 145 N.H. 82, 86 (2000) (quotation and brackets omitted).
  • Handley v. Town of Hooksett 785 A.2d 399 N.H. 2001
    Appeal of Van Lunen, 145 N.H. 82, 86 (2000).
  • State v. Burr 782 A.2d 914 N.H. 2001
    When construing its meaning[,] we first examine the language found in the statute, and where possible, we ascribe the plain and ordinary meanings to words used.” Appeal of Estate of Van Lunen, 145 N.H. 82, 85 (2000) (quotation and brackets omitted).
  • Trachy v. LaFramboise 770 A.2d 1097 N.H. 2001
    Appeal of Van Lunen, 145 N.H. 82, 86 (2000) (quotation, brackets and citation omitted).
  • Carter v. Lachance 766 A.2d 717 N.H. 2001
    When construing its meaning we first examine the language found in the statute, and where possible, we ascribe the plain and ordinary meanings to words used.” Appeal of Van Lunen, 145 N.H. 82, 86 (2000) (quotations, brackets, and ellipsis omitted).
  • Tyler Road Development Corp. v. Town of Londonderry 766 A.2d 267 N.H. 2000
    When construing its meaning we *619 first examine the language found in the statute, and where possible, we ascribe the plain and ordinary meanings to words.” Appeal of Van Lumen, 145 N.H. 82, 86, 750 A.2d 737, 740 (2000).
  • Fowler v. Town of Seabrook 765 A.2d 146 N.H. 2000
    Appeal of Estate of Van Lunen, 145 N.H. 82, 86, 750 A.2d 737, 740 (2000) (quotation, brackets, and citation omitted).
  • McKenzie v. City of Berlin 767 A.2d 396 N.H. 2000
    Appeal of Estate of Van Lunen, 145 N.H. 82, 86, 750 A.2d 737, 740 (2000) (quotation, brackets, and citation omitted).