Cited by

Rather than relying on McMinn or other relevant precedent, we relied on State v. Laurent, 144 N.H. 517, 522 (1999), which involved a defendant’s requested instruction on his theory of the case.

State v. Laurent, 144 N.H. 517, 520 (1999) (holding State’s comments permissible as rebuttal to inferences created by defendant).

We decline to rule upon any theory of negligence, to the extent asserted, other than negligent placement as the plaintiffs failed to provide developed legal argument warranting appellate review.

Upon the defendant’s request, the trial court immediately instructed the jury that Ferris’ testimony about his reaction to the defendant’s request “may not have anything to do at all with the state of the law to the charge against the defendant.” The court’s decision not to give final jury instructions regarding Ferris’ reaction to the defendant was well within its discretion.

State v. Laurent, 144 N.H. 517, 522 (1999); see also Lambert, 147 N.H. 295, 296 (2001) (explaining unsustainable exercise of discretion standard).

State v. Laurent, 144 N.H. 517, 522 (1999); see also Lambert, 147 N.H at 296.

The bank’s argument also fails to take into account the impact of Madigan’s bankruptcy upon Pfeifer’s right of contribution.

Snow v. American Morgan Horse Assoc., 141 N.H 467, 472 (1996) (this court will not review on appeal constitutional issues not presented below); cf. State v. Laurent, 144 N.H. 517, 521 (1999) (declining to review vague and undeveloped argument).

We will not expend judicial resources on undeveloped argument.

State v. Laurent, 144 N.H. 517, 521 (1999) (“vague and undeveloped” argument does not require appellate review); see also Keenan, 130 N.H. at 499.

“We review the trial court’s failure to give [an alibi] instruction for an abuse of discretion.” State v. Laurent, 144 N.H. 517, 522 (1999).

To the extent that the defendant argues that he has either a liberty or property interest in continued employment, this argument is not developed and we decline to devote appellate resources to it.

Co. v. City of Franklin, 141 N.H. 449, 454, 685 A.2d 913, 918 (1996), or are undeveloped, see State v. Laurent, 144 N.H. 517, 521, 744 A.2d 598, 601 (1999), and we decline to do so here.