Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite Union Leader Corp. v. New Hampshire Housing Finance Authority, 705 A.2d 725.

21 citing documents.

Brown v. Grafton Cnty. Dep't of Corr. 2025 N.H. 2 N.H. 2025
Auth., 142 N.H. 540, 548 (1997) (explaining that “[t]he Vaughn index is a procedure developed by the federal courts to effectuate the goal of broad disclosure of public documents and assist trial courts in cases involving a large number of documents”); see also Vaughn v. Rosen, 484 F.2d 820, 823-25 (D.C.
Natalie Anderson v. New Hampshire Professional Conduct Committee & a. N.H. 2024
Auth., 142 N.H. 540, 546 (1997) (interpretation of Right- to-Know Law is ultimately issue for this court to decide).
Samuel Provenza v. Town of Canaan N.H. 2022
Auth., 142 N.H. 540, 554 (1997) (placing burden on the private developer opposing release by the New Hampshire Housing Finance Authority of documents sought by two newspapers pertaining to developer’s housing developments).
American Civil Liberties Union of New Hampshire & a. v. City of Concord N.H. 2021
On one hand, when the government seeks to withhold requested documents, it has “exclusive control of vital information.” Union Leader Corp. v. N.H. Housing Fin.
Hampstead School Board & a. v. School Administrative Unit No. 55 N.H. 2021
Auth., 142 N.H. 540, 553 (1997) (discussing exemption for “confidential, commercial, or financial information”).
Robert V. Towle v. Commissioner, New Hampshire Department of Corrections N.H. 2021
Union Leader Corp. v. N.H. Housing Fin.
Union Leader Corporation & a. v. Town of Salem N.H. 2020
Auth., 142 N.H. 540, 552, 555-59 (1997); Chambers, 135 N.H. at 481; Brent v. Paquette, 132 N.H. 415, 426-28 (1989).
Seacoast Newspapers, Inc. v. City of Portsmouth N.H. 2020
Union Leader Corp. v. N.H. Housing Fin.
Thomas Reid v. New Hampshire Attorney General 169 N.H. 509 N.H. 2016
Auth., 142 N.H. 540, 552 (1997) (stating that “[a]n expansive construction of the[] terms [‘confidential, commercial, or financial’ in RSA 91- A:5, IV] must be avoided, since to do otherwise would allow the exemption to swallow the rule and is inconsistent with the purposes and objectives of RSA chapter 91-A” (quotation and brackets omit
Ettinger v. Town of Madison Planning Board 35 A.3d 562 N.H. 2011
Union Leader Corp. v. N.H. Housing Fin.
Union Leader Corp. v. New Hampshire Retirement System 34 A.3d 725 N.H. 2011
Where, as here, an “exemption is claimed on privacy grounds, we examine the nature of the requested document or material and its relationship to the basic purpose of the Right-to-Know Law.” Union Leader Corp. v. N.H. Housing Fin.
Montenegro v. City of Dover 34 A.3d 717 N.H. 2011
Auth., 142 N.H. 540, 548-49 (1997) (discussing use of Vaughn index).
ATV Watch v. New Hampshire Department of Transportation 20 A.3d 919 N.H. 2011
Auth., 142 N.H. 540, 548-49 (1997) (discussing use of Vaughn index).
Professional Firefighters v. Local Government Center, Inc. 992 A.2d 582 N.H. 2010
Auth., 142 N.H. 540, 547 (1997), and “[n]ot all organizations that work for or with the government are subject to the right-to-know law,” Bradbury v. Shaw, 116 *704 N.H. 388, 389 (1976).
Lambert v. Belknap County Convention 949 A.2d 709 N.H. 2008
Auth., 142 N.H. 540, 546 (1997) (quotation omitted); see also Lamy, 152 N.H. at 108.
Murray v. New Hampshire Division of State Police 913 A.2d 737 N.H. 2006
Auth., 142 N.H. 540, 548-551 (1997) (explaining the attributes of a Vaughn index).
Lamy v. New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission 872 A.2d 1006 N.H. 2005
By so doing, we “best effectuate the statutory and constitutional objective of facilitating access to all public documents.” Union Leader Corp. v. N.H. Housing Fin.
Professional Firefighters v. HealthTrust, Inc. 861 A.2d 789 N.H. 2004
Union Leader Corp. v. N.H. Housing Fin.
New Hampshire Civil Liberties Union v. City of Manchester 821 A.2d 1014 N.H. 2003
Union Leader Corp. v. N.H. Housing Fin.
Goode v. New Hampshire Office of the Legislative Budget Assistant 813 A.2d 381 N.H. 2002
“We resolve questions regarding the law with a view to providing the utmost information in order to best effectuate the statutory and constitutional objective of facilitating access to all public documents.” Union Leader Corp. v. N.H. Housing Fin.
Goode v. New Hampshire Office of the Legislative Budget Assistant 767 A.2d 393 N.H. 2000
“We resolve questions regarding the law with a view to providing the utmost information in order to best effectuate the statutory and constitutional objective of facilitating access to all public documents.” Union Leader Corp. v. N.H. Housing Fin.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by