DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite Estate of Frederick v. Frederick, 687 A.2d 711.

15 citing documents.

  • Deborah Dascenzo-Paul v. Brian Paul N.H. 2024
    Estate of Frederick v. Frederick, 141 N.H. 530, 531 (1996) (“The interpretation of the language of a divorce decree, like the interpretation of other written documents, is a question of law, reviewed by this court de novo.”).
  • In the Matter of Johanna Papantones and Mark Papantones N.H. 2023
    Estate of Frederick v. Frederick, 141 N.H. 530, 531 (1996).
  • Petition of Louis L. Lafasciano N.H. 2022
    “The interpretation of the language of a divorce decree, like the interpretation of other written documents, is a question of law, reviewed by this court de novo.” Estate of Frederick v. Frederick, 141 N.H. 530, 531 (1996).
  • In the Matter of Sandra L. Patient and Marcel C. Patient, Jr. 169 A.3d 465 N.H. 2017
    “The interpretation of the language of a divorce decree, like the interpretation of other written documents, is a question of law, reviewed by this court de novo.” Estate of Frederick v. Frederick, 141 N.H. 530, 531 (1996).
  • In the Matter of Jeffrey Oligny and Paula Oligny 169 N.H. 533 N.H. 2016
    “The interpretation of the language of a divorce decree, like the interpretation of other written documents, is a question of law, reviewed by this court de novo.” Estate of Frederick v. Frederick, 141 N.H. 530, 531 (1996).
  • Christy Silver m/n/f Rome Joseph Poto v. Lenora Poto & a. N.H. 2015
    “The interpretation of the language of a divorce decree, like the interpretation of other written documents, is a question of law, reviewed by this court de novo.” Estate of Frederick v. Frederick, 141 N.H. 530, 531 (1996).
  • Edwards v. RAL AUTOMOTIVE GROUP, INC. 942 A.2d 1268 N.H. 2008
    Estate of Frederick v. Frederick, 141 N.H. 530, 531 (1996).
  • Ryan James Realty, LLC v. Villages at Chester Condominium Ass'n 893 A.2d 661 N.H. 2006
    The interpretation of a written document is a question of law, which we review de novo.
  • Estate of Tremaine v. Tremaine 780 A.2d 522 N.H. 2001
    She contends that: (1) the language of the divorce decree is not an express and unambiguous statement of intent as required by the Dubois/Frederick test, see Estate of Frederick v. Frederick, 141 N.H. 530, 532 (1996); Dubois v. Smith, 135 N.H. 50, 56 (1991); (2) the decedent’s financial affidavit did not list the IRA, thus failing to give her notice of the rights she would be relinquishing; and (3) the decedent’s estate’s reliance on RSA 551:13 (Supp. 2000) is misplaced.
  • In re Petition to Enlarge Estate of McIntosh 773 A.2d 649 N.H. 2001
    re there was an “explicit written beneficiary designation in the initial IRA agreement which remained unchanged as of the date of the decedent’s death.” We have upheld the binding effect of such written beneficiary designations in other contractual arrangements, such as life insurance, see Dubois v. Smith, 135 N.H. 50, 60 (1991), and annuity pension accounts, see Estate of Frederick v. Frederick, 141 N.H. 530, 532-33 (1996).
  • Estate of Croteau v. Croteau 722 A.2d 464 N.H. 1998
    Estate of Frederick v. Frederick, 141 N.H. 530, 531, 687 A.2d 711, 713 (1996).
  • Bursey v. Town of Hudson 719 A.2d 577 N.H. 1998
    Bonneville v. Bonneville, 142 N.H. 435, 438, 702 A.2d 823, 825 (1997); see Estate of Frederick v. Frederick, 141 N.H. 530, 531, 687 A.2d 711, 713 (1996).
  • Appeal of Londonderry School District 707 A.2d 137 N.H. 1998
    Estate of Frederick v. Frederick, 141 N.H. 530, 532, 687 A.2d 711, 713 (1996).
  • Bonneville v. Bonneville 702 A.2d 823 N.H. 1997
    Estate of Frederick v. Frederick, 141 N.H. 530, 531, 687 A.2d 711, 713 (1996); see also Byrne v. Ackerlund, 739 P.2d 1138, 1143 (Wash.
  • Keshishian v. CMC Radiologists 698 A.2d 1228 N.H. 1997
    Estate of Frederick v. Frederick, 141 N.H. 530, 531-32, 687 A.2d 711, 713 (1996); cf. Holden Eng’g and Surveying v. Pembroke Rd.