Cited by
Opinions in New Hampshire that cite State v. MacLeod, 685 A.2d 473.
-
State v. Maxi
2024 N.H. 8
N.H. 2024
State v. MacLeod, 141 N.H. 427, 429 (1996); McKean, 147 N.H. at 201.
-
State v. Dansereau
956 A.2d 310
N.H. 2008
State v. MacLeod, 141 N.H. 427, 434 (1996); State v. Morey, 103 N.H. 529, 530 (1961).
-
State v. Parker
921 A.2d 366
N.H. 2007
State v. MacLeod, 141 N.H. 427, 434 (1996) (federal rule of lenity resolves ambiguity in statutes against greater punishment).
-
State v. Sanchez
883 A.2d 292
N.H. 2005
State v. MacLeod, 141 N.H. 427, 429 (1996) (citations, quotations and brackets omitted).
-
State v. Hull
827 A.2d 1001
N.H. 2003
The defendant argues the trial court erroneously applied the rationale of State v. MacLeod, 141 N.H. 427, 429 (1996), in denying his motion to set aside the felony reckless conduct verdict.
-
State v. Hammell
787 A.2d 850
N.H. 2001
While the trial court was empowered to curb the prosecution’s broad discretion if there existed the danger of confusion, harassment or other unfair prejudice, State v. MacLeod, 141 N.H. 427, 434 (1996), we do not find those dangers here.
-
State v. McKean
785 A.2d 404
N.H. 2001
State v. MacLeod, 141 N.H. 427, 429 (1996) (quotations, citations, brackets and emphasis omitted).
-
State v. Krueger
776 A.2d 720
N.H. 2001
MacLeod, 141 N.H. 427, 429 (1996) (quotations, citations, brackets and italics omitted).
-
State v. Decosta
772 A.2d 340
N.H. 2001
State v. MacLeod, 141 N.H. 427, 429 (1996) (quotations, citations, brackets and italics omitted).
-
State v. Ford
738 A.2d 937
N.H. 1999
The Double Jeopardy Clause “protects a criminal defendant from multiple punishments *65 for the same offense.” State v. MacLeod, 141 N.H. 427, 429, 685 A.2d 473, 475 (1996) (quotation omitted).
-
State v. Courtemarche
711 A.2d 248
N.H. 1998
See, e.g., State v. MacLeod, 141 N.H. 427, 434, 685 A.2d 473, 479 (1996) (recognizing trial court’s authority to curb overcharging by prosecutor that constitutes harassment); see also State v. Gosselin, 117 N.H. 115, 119, 370 A.2d 264, 268 (1977).
-
State v. Liakos
709 A.2d 187
N.H. 1998
In making this inquiry, “we review and compare the statutory elements of the charged offenses in light of the actual allegations contained in the indictments.” State v. MacLeod, 141 N.H. 427, 429, 685 A.2d 473, 476 (1996).
-
State v. Rayes
703 A.2d 1381
N.H. 1997
The trial court may, however, “curb the prosecution’s broad discretion if overcharging poses dangers of confusion, harassment, or other unfair prejudice.” State v. MacLeod, 141 N.H. 427, 434, 685 A.2d 473, 479 (1996) (quotations omitted).
-
State v. Ringuette
697 A.2d 507
N.H. 1997
The test for determining whether sentences for two charges constitute multiple punishments for the same offense is the “difference in evidence” test, State v. MacLeod, 141 N.H. 427, 431-33, 685 A.2d 473, 477-78 (1996), which considers “whether proof of the elements of the crimes as charged will in actuality require a difference in evidence,” Heald, 123 N.H. at 473, 464 A.2d at 278 (emphasis deleted).
-
State v. Hennessey
697 A.2d 930
N.H. 1997
The critical distinction is that RSA 651:6 merely provides an alternative extended sentence for certain offenses which the trial court may impose provided certain criteria are met, and not an additional offense and sentence based on a circumstance already used to elevate another offense.
-
State v. Burr
696 A.2d 1114
N.H. 1997
Our subsequent discussion of the defendant’s vestéd rights argument is therefore limited to the State Constitution, and we cite decisions to the extent that they rely upon federal law only as an aid to our analysis.
-
State v. Crate
686 A.2d 318
N.H. 1996
“[W]e review and compare the statutory elements of the charged offenses in light of the actual allegations contained in the indictments.” State v. MacLeod, 141 N.H. 427, 429, 685 A.2d 473, 476 (1996).