DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite Mahan v. New Hampshire Department of Administrative Services, 693 A.2d 79.

14 citing documents.

  • Tamre McCrea & a. v. New Hampshire Department of Transportation N.H. 2025
    Mahan v. N.H. Dep’t of Admin.
  • Lois Stearns & a. v. Town of Gorham & a. N.H. 2025
    Nor are we convinced by the plaintiffs’ arguments to the contrary based upon Mahan v. New Hampshire Department of Administrative Services, 141 N.H. 747 (1997).
  • Lynette Maryea v. Thomas Velardi & A 168 N.H. 633 N.H. 2016
    Services, 141 N.H. 747, 751 (1997)]; and the training and supervision of coaches and referees at a school basketball game, Hacking [v. Town of Belmont, 143 N.H. 546, 550 (1999)].
  • Bob Matte's Raceway Motors, Inc. v. Michael Smith N.H. 2015
    Services., 141 N.H. 747, 754 (1997) (stating when common law negligence action exists, negligence per se doctrine may define statutory standard of conduct as alternative to reasonable person standard).
  • In Re Opinion of Justices 27 A.3d 859 N.H. 2011
    Services, 141 N.H. 747, 749-50 (1997) (judiciary is reluctant to evaluate the wisdom of an executive or legislative choice of public policy goals or the means to achieve them).
  • Laramie v. Stone 999 A.2d 262 N.H. 2010
    Services, 141 N.H. 747, 749 (1997) (“The[ ] exceptions [to RSA chapter 541-B] are similar to the judicially recognized exceptions to the abrogation of municipal immunity....”); Bergerson v. City of Manchester, 140 N.H. 417, 421 (1995).
  • Tarbell Administrator, Inc. v. City of Concord 956 A.2d 322 N.H. 2008
    Services, 141 N.H. 747, 750 (1997), are precisely the type of municipal planning that discretionary function immunity seeks to protect.
  • Everitt v. General Electric Co. 932 A.2d 831 N.H. 2007
    Mahan v. N. H. Dep’t of Admin.
  • Hughes v. New Hampshire Division of Aeronautics 871 A.2d 18 N.H. 2005
    Services, 141 N.H. 747, 749 (1997) (citing Tilton v. Dougherty, 126 N.H. 294, 297 (1985)).
  • Smart v. American Welding & Tank Co. 826 A.2d 570 N.H. 2003
    Mahan v. N.H. Dep’t of Admin.
  • Delaney v. State 769 A.2d 1043 N.H. 2001
    Mahan v. N.H. Dep’t of Admin.
  • Purdie v. Attorney General 732 A.2d 442 N.H. 1999
    “When reviewing the denial of a motion for summary judgment, we consider the pleadings and any accompanying affidavits, and all proper inferences drawn from them, in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party.” Mahan v. N.H. Dep’t of Admin.
  • Hacking v. Town of Belmont 736 A.2d 1229 N.H. 1999
    Services, 141 N.H. 747, 750, 693 A.2d 79, 82 (1997) (quotation and brackets omitted) (decided under the discretionary function exception to the State’s waiver of sovereign immunity).
  • Goss v. State 714 A.2d 225 N.H. 1998
    “When reviewing the denial of a motion for summary judgment, we consider the pleadings and any accompanying affidavits, and all proper inferences drawn from them, in the light most favorable to the non moving party.” Mahan v. N.H. Dep’t of Admin.