Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite In re Angel N., 679 A.2d 1136.

13 citing documents.

In re Estate of Lucien Couture 166 N.H. 101 N.H. 2014
Consequently, we will not disturb the probate division’s decree unless it is unsupported by the evidence or plainly erroneous as a matter of law.
In re Estate of Wilber 75 A.3d 1096 N.H. 2013
“Consequently, we will not disturb the probate court’s decree unless it is unsupported by the evidence or plainly erroneous as a matter of law.” In re Angel N., 141 N.H. 158, 161 (1996) (quotation and brackets omitted).
In Re Adam R. 992 A.2d 697 N.H. 2010
In re Angel N., 141 N.H. 158, 165 (1996) (Johnson, J. dissenting).
In Re Guardianship of Domey 960 A.2d 729 N.H. 2008
“Consequently, we will not disturb the probate court’s decree unless it is unsupported by the evidence or plainly erroneous as a matter of law.” In re Angel N., 141 N.H. 158, 161 (1996) (quotation and brackets omitted).
In re Estate of Treloar 859 A.2d 1162 N.H. 2004
“Consequently, we will not disturb the probate court’s decree unless it is unsupported by the evidence or plainly erroneous as a matter of law.” In re Angel N., 141 N.H. 158, 161 (1996) (quotation and brackets omitted).
In re Jonathan T. 808 A.2d 82 N.H. 2002
id.; see also In re Angel N., 141 N.H. 158, 164 (1996); In re Kristopher B., 125 N.H. at 682-83.
In re Craig T. 800 A.2d 819 N.H. 2002
Consequently, on appeal, we will not disturb the probate court’s decree unless it is *746 unsupported by the evidence or plainly erroneous as a matter of law."
In re Shannon M. 766 A.2d 729 N.H. 2001
“First, it must find one of the statutory grounds for termination; thereafter, it must determine whether termination would be in the best interest of the child.” In re Angel N., 141 N.H. 158, 164 (1996).
In re Craig T. 744 A.2d 621 N.H. 1999
When neglect is due to a parent’s unwillingness or reluctance to assume basic responsibilities, then society has a right to interfere to protect the innocent child.” In re Angel N., 141 N.H. 158, 164, 679 A.2d 1136, 1140 (1996).
In re Brittany L. 737 A.2d 670 N.H. 1999
While much of the evidence is disputed by other witnesses, including Ernest L., the evaluation of witness credibility is within the probate court’s sound discretion.
In re Jesse F. 722 A.2d 457 N.H. 1998
“It is within the probate court’s sound discretion to evaluate credibility,” In re Angel N., 141 N.H. 158, 163, 679 A.2d 1136, 1139 (1996), because “[t]he imponderables of human relationships may be better dealt with at first hand than at second.” Pendergast v. Titus, 95 N.H. 191, 193, 60 A.2d 122, 124 (1948).
In re William A. 705 A.2d 1196 N.H. 1998
“We will not disturb the probate court’s decree unless it is unsupported by the evidence or plainly erroneous as a matter of law.” In re Angel N., 141 N.H. 158, 161, 679 A.2d 1136, 1138 (1996); see RSA 567-A:4 (1997).
In re Estate of Washburn 690 A.2d 1024 N.H. 1997
We will uphold the findings and rulings of the probate court unless unsupported by the evidence or clearly erroneous as a matter of law.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by