Cited by
Opinions in New Hampshire that cite Weaver v. Royal Insurance Co. of America, 674 A.2d 975.
-
Keene Auto Body, Inc. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
N.H. 2022
See, e.g., Exeter Hosp., 170 N.H. at 179; Weaver v. Royal Ins.
- Mellin v. Northern Security Insurance 115 A.3d 799 N.H. 2015
- Ross v. Home Insurance 773 A.2d 654 N.H. 2001
- Lebroke v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance 769 A.2d 392 N.H. 2001
- Trachy v. LaFramboise 770 A.2d 1097 N.H. 2001
- Funai v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Co. 765 A.2d 689 N.H. 2000
- Martin v. Maine Mutual Fire Insurance 764 A.2d 911 N.H. 2000
-
Bianco Professional Ass'n v. Home Insurance
740 A.2d 1051
N.H. 1999
Co. of America, 140 N.H. 780, 781-82, 674 A.2d 975, 977 (1996), we construe “the Insured” in both paragraphs to refer to the same person.
- Federal Bake Shop v. Farmington Casualty Co. 736 A.2d 459 N.H. 1999
- Auto-Owners Insurance Co. v. Hanson Ex Rel. DeMoss 588 N.W.2d 777 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
-
Draper v. Brennan
713 A.2d 373
N.H. 1998
Co. of America, 140 N.H. 780, 781, 674 A.2d 975, 977 (1996) (citation omitted); see also RSA 491:8-a, III (1997).
-
Hoepp v. State Farm Insurance
697 A.2d 943
N.H. 1997
“If the policy language is ambiguous or where conflicting interpretations exist, we construe the policy in favor of providing coverage to the insured.” Weaver v. Royal Ins.
-
Hudson v. Farm Family Mutual Insurance
697 A.2d 501
N.H. 1997
Co., 139 N.H. 39, 41, 648 A.2d 474, 476 (1994); see Weaver v. Royal Ins.