DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite Marcotte v. Timberlane/Hampstead School District, 733 A.2d 394.

20 citing documents.

  • State of New Hampshire v. Brian Eldridge N.H. 2020
    Marcotte v. Timberlane/Hampstead School Dist., 143 N.H. 331, 338-39 (1999) (noting that commas between enumerated elements and before the conjunction “and” generally indicate discrete elements); see also State v. Stiles, 128 N.H. 81, 88 (1986) (treating possession of a controlled drug and possession with intent to sell a controlled drug as discrete offenses).
  • In re J.W. 213 A.3d 853 N.H. 2019
    143 N.H. 331, 339, 733 A.2d 394 (1999), and we presume that the legislature did not enact superfluous or redundant words, Winnacunnet Coop.
  • Town of Amherst v. Gilroy 950 A.2d 193 N.H. 2008
    Marcotte v. Timberlane/Hampstead, School Dist., 143 N.H. 331, 339 (1999).
  • Alonzi v. Northeast Generation Services Co. 940 A.2d 1153 N.H. 2008
    Tarr, 116 N.H. at 103; see also Marcotte v. Timberlane/Hampstead School Dist., 143 N.H. 331, 345 (1999) (damages for loss of life recoverable in wrongful death action).
  • Boynton v. Figueroa 913 A.2d 697 N.H. 2006
    Marcotte v. Timberlane/Hampstead School Dish, 143 N.H. 331, 348 (1999).
  • State v. Gero 877 A.2d 201 N.H. 2005
    Marcotte v. Timberlane/Hampstead, School Dist., 143 N.H. 331, 339 (1999) (legislature not presumed to waste words or enact redundant provisions).
  • State v. Yates 876 A.2d 176 N.H. 2005
    “The legislature is not presumed to waste words or enact redundant provisions and whenever possible, every word of a statute should be given effect.” Marcotte v. Timberlane/Hampstead School Dist., 143 N.H. 331, 339 (1999).
  • Carignan v. New Hampshire International Speedway, Inc. 858 A.2d 536 N.H. 2004
    Marcotte v. Timberlane/Hampstead School Dist., 143 N.H. 331, 347 (1999).
  • Gordonville Corp. v. LR1-A Ltd. Partnership 856 A.2d 746 N.H. 2004
    Marcotte v. Timberlane/Hampstead School Dist., 143 N.H. 331, 339 (1999).
  • Saviano v. Director, N.H. Division of Motor Vehicles 855 A.2d 1278 N.H. 2004
    Marcotte v. Timberlane/Hampstead School Dist., 143 N.H. 331, 337 (1999).
  • White Cliffs at Dover v. Bulman 855 A.2d 437 N.H. 2004
    Marcotte v. Timberlane/Hampstead School Dist., 143 N.H. 331, 337 (1999).
  • Porter v. City of Manchester 849 A.2d 103 N.H. 2004
    Marcotte v. Timberlane/Hampstead School Dist., 143 N.H. 331, 347 (1999).
  • Pelletier v. City of Manchester 844 A.2d 484 N.H. 2004
    Marcotte v. Timberlane/Hampstead School Dist., 143 N.H. 331, 337 (1999).
  • Remington Investments, Inc. v. Howard 843 A.2d 334 N.H. 2004
    Marcotte v. Timberlane/Hampstead School Dist., 143 N.H. 331, 337 (1999).
  • McLaughlin v. Fisher Engineering 834 A.2d 258 N.H. 2003
    403; Marcotte v. Timberlane/Hampstead School Dist., 143 N.H. 331, 346 (1999).
  • R.J. Moreau Companies, Inc. v. Town of Litchfield 813 A.2d 527 N.H. 2002
    “Where the language of a statute is clear on its face, its meaning is not subject to modification.” Marcotte v. Timberlane/Hampstead School Dist., 143 N.H. 331, 337 (1999).
  • State v. Cook 813 A.2d 480 N.H. 2002
    Marcotte v. Timberlane/Hampstead School Dist., 143 N.H. 331, 346-47 (1999).
  • Kravitz v. Beech Hill Hospital, L.L.C. 808 A.2d 34 N.H. 2002
    Marcotte v. Timberlane/Hampstead School Dist., 143 N.H. 331, 346 (1999); see also Lambert, 147 N.H. at 296 (explaining unsustainable exercise of discretion standard).
  • State v. Lavallee 765 A.2d 671 N.H. 2000
    “The determination of whether evidence is relevant is within the sound discretion of the trial court, and we will not reverse its determination absent evidence of abuse of that discretion.” Marcotte v. Timberlane/Hampstead School Dist., 143 N.H. 331, 346, 733 A.2d 394, 405 (1999) (quotation omitted).
  • Bennett v. Lembo 761 A.2d 494 N.H. 2000
    Marcotte v. Timberlane/Hampstead School Dist., 143 N.H. 331, 336-45, 733 A.2d 394, 399-405 (1999).