DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite State v. Grant-Chase, 665 A.2d 380.

14 citing documents.

  • State v. Kevin Lynch 156 A.3d 1012 N.H. 2017
    Similarly, the Court held that “[i]f the individual states that he wants an attorney, the interrogation must cease until an attorney is present.” Miranda, 384 U.S. at 474; see State v. Grant-Chase, 140 N.H. 264, 267 (1995) (explaining that, if a defendant requests counsel after Miranda warnings have been given or after interrogation has begun, there is “an irrebuttable presumption that the defendant asked for the assistance of counsel for the purpose of having counsel present during any further
  • State v. Parker 921 A.2d 366 N.H. 2007
    State v. Grant-Chase, 140 N.H. 264, 267 (1995) (on appeal, questions of law are considered de novo).
  • State v. Ayer 917 A.2d 214 N.H. 2006
    ‘While we review a trial court’s finding concerning which words a defendant used to invoke the right to counsel under the clearly erroneous standard, whether those words constitute an invocation of the right to counsel is a question of law, which we review de novo.” State v. Grant-Chase, 140 N.H. 264, 267 (1995) (citations omitted), cert.
  • State v. Roache 803 A.2d 572 N.H. 2002
    If the suspect requests to speak with the attorney, then the police must comply with the holding in Edwards v. Arizona, 451 U.S. 477, 484-85 (1981).
  • State v. Aubuchont 784 A.2d 1170 N.H. 2001
    State v. Grant-Chase, 140 N.H. 264, 267-68 (1995), cert.
  • State v. Tucker 765 A.2d 1058 N.H. 2001
    Pennsylvania v. Muniz, 496 U.S. 582, 601 (1990); State v. Grant-Chase, 140 N.H. 264, 268, 665 A.2d 380, 383, cert.
  • State v. Dorval 743 A.2d 836 N.H. 1999
    We look to our State Constitution first “and then, if necessary, to the Federal Constitution to determine whether it provides the defendant with greater protection.” State v. Grant-Chase, 140 N.H. 264, 266, 665 A.2d 380, 382 (1995), cert.
  • State v. Patch 702 A.2d 1278 N.H. 1997
    State v. Grant-Chase, 140 N.H. 264, 266, 665 A.2d 380, 382 (1995), cert.
  • State v. Paone 697 A.2d 1390 N.H. 1997
    State v. Grant-Chase, 140 N.H. 264, 267, 665 A.2d 380, 382 (1995), cert.
  • State v. Zeta Chi Fraternity 696 A.2d 530 N.H. 1997
    We address the defendant’s claims first under the State Constitution, State v. Ball, 124 N.H. 226, 231, 471 A.2d 347, 350 (1983), considering cases from the federal courts and courts of other jurisdictions only as an analytical aid, State v. Grant-Chase, 140 N.H. 264, 266, 665 A.2d 380, 382, (1995), cert.
  • Sullivan County Regional Refuse Disposal District v. Town of Acworth 686 A.2d 755 N.H. 1996
    Cole, 43 F.3d at 1383; State v. Grant-Chase, 140 N.H. 264, 267, 665 A.2d 380, 382 (1995), cert.
  • State v. Hoyt 684 A.2d 1349 N.H. 1996
    State v. Grant-Chase, 140 N.H. 264, 267, 665 A.2d 380, 382 (1995), cert.
  • State v. Weeks 681 A.2d 86 N.H. 1996
    We address the defendant’s claim first under the State Constitution, State v. Ball, 124 N.H. 226, 231, 471 A.2d 347, 350 (1983), considering cases from the federal courts and courts of other States only as an analytical aid, State v. Grant-Chase, 140 N.H. 264, 266, 665 A.2d 380, 382 (1995), cert.
  • State v. Roach 677 A.2d 157 N.H. 1996
    State v. Grant-Chase, 140 N.H. 264, 267, 665 A.2d 380, 382 (1995), cert.