Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite Holden Engineering & Surveying, Inc. v. Pembroke Road Realty Trust, 628 A.2d 260.

18 citing documents.

Schleicher and Stebbins Hotels, LLC & a. v. Starr Surplus Lines Insurance Company & a. N.H. 2023
Realty Trust, 137 N.H. 393, 396 (1993) (where provision in contract is unambiguous, extrinsic evidence should not have been used to contradict contract); Verveine Corp., 184 N.E.3d at 1277-78 (rejecting insured’s proposed “negative implication” from the absence of an express virus exclusion in certain policies while it is included in others); I
Evan Greenwald & a. v. Richard Keating & a. 212 A.3d 936 N.H. 2019
Holden Eng’g and Surveying v. Pembroke Rd.
Joseph A. Santos v. Metropolitan Property and Casualty Insurance Company N.H. 2019
Holden Eng’g and Surveying v. Pembroke Rd.
Santos v. Metro. Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co. 201 A.3d 1243 N.H. 2019
Holden Eng'g and Surveying v. Pembroke Rd.
Estate of Theodore R. Mortner & a. v. Lindsay Thompson 182 A.3d 1260 N.H. 2018
Holden Eng’g and Surveying v. Pembroke Rd.
East Industrial Park Condominium Association v. Charles Blais N.H. 2015
Holden Eng’g and Surveying v. Pembroke Rd.
Lake v. Sullivan 766 A.2d 708 N.H. 2001
Holden v. Eng’g and Surveying v. Pembroke Rd.
West v. Turchioe 761 A.2d 382 N.H. 1999
*515 Holden Eng’g and Surveying v. Pembroke Rd.
Appeal of the City of Manchester 743 A.2d 821 N.H. 1999
“[Conditions precedent are not favored, and we will not so construe such conditions unless required by the plain language of the agreement.” Holden Eng’g and, Surveying v. Pembroke Rd.
Hopkins v. Fleet Bank 724 A.2d 1287 N.H. 1999
Holden Eng’g and Surveying v. Pembroke Rd.
Appeal of Reid 722 A.2d 489 N.H. 1998
“[T]he interpretation of a contract, including whether a contract term is ambiguous, is ultimately a question of law for this court to decide.” Holden Eng’g and Surveying v. Pembroke Rd.
Galloway v. Chicago-Soft, Ltd. 713 A.2d 982 N.H. 1998
Realty Trust, 137 N.H. 393, 396, 628 A.2d 260, 262 (1993); Parkhurst v. Gibson (Parkhurst), 133 N.H. 57, 61-62, 573 A.2d 454, 457 (1990), our standard of review is more deferential.
Bonneville v. Bonneville 702 A.2d 823 N.H. 1997
Realty Trust, 137 N.H. 393, 396, 628 A.2d 260, 262 (1993), “conditions precedent are not favored,” and we will not infer that they were intended unless required by the plain language of the decree or stipulation.
Keshishian v. CMC Radiologists 698 A.2d 1228 N.H. 1997
Realty Trust, 137 N.H. 393, 396, 628 A.2d 260, 262 (1993) (suggesting that a different standard of review would be used if trial court properly admitted extrinsic evidence).
Hudson v. Farm Family Mutual Insurance 697 A.2d 501 N.H. 1997
Co. of North America, 137 N.H. 57, 59, 623 A.2d 746, 747 (1993); see also Holden Eng’g and Surveying v. Pembroke Rd.
Alexander v. Blackstone Realty Associates 684 A.2d 60 N.H. 1996
Holden Eng’g and, Surveying v. Pembroke Rd.
Merrimack School District v. National School Bus Service, Inc. 661 A.2d 1197 N.H. 1995
The defendant argues that the trial court erred in finding that the transportation agreement was not ambiguous, “[interpretation of a contract, including whether a contract term [or clause] is ambiguous, is ultimately a question of law for this court to decide.” Holden Eng’g and Surveying v. Pembroke Rd.
Walsh v. Young 660 A.2d 1139 N.H. 1995
Restaurant Operators, Inc. v. Jenney, 128 *696 N.H. 708, 710, 519 A.2d 256, 258 (1986); see Holden Eng’g and Surveying v. Pembroke Rd.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by