Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite Appeal of Astro Spectacular, Inc., 639 A.2d 249.

35 citing documents.

Appeal of New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services N.H. 2020
Appeal of Astro Spectacular, 138 N.H. 298, 300 (1994) (stating that, when interpreting a statute, the court “can neither ignore the plain language of the legislation nor add words which the lawmakers did not see fit to include” (quotation omitted)).
State v. Davidson 44 A.3d 454 N.H. 2012
Appeal of Astro Spectacular, 138 N.H. 298, 300 (1994) (“The legislative intent is to be found not in what the legislature might have said, but rather in the meaning of what it did say.” (quotation omitted)).
Lillie-Putz Trust v. DownEast Energy Corp. 8 A.3d 65 N.H. 2010
Appeal of Astro Spectacular, 138 N.H. 298, 300 (1994) (interpreting statute).
In Re Mooney 7 A.3d 1145 N.H. 2010
Appeal of Astro Spectacular, 138 N.H. 298, 300 (1994).
State v. Villeneuve 999 A.2d 284 N.H. 2010
Appeal of Astro Spectacular, 138 N.H. 298, 300 (1994).
In Re of Gray 993 A.2d 203 N.H. 2010
“Courts can neither ignore the plain language of the legislation nor add words which the lawmakers did not see fit to include.” Appeal of Astro Spectacular, 138 N.H. 298, 300 (1994) (quotation omitted).
COLLDEN CORP. v. Town of Wolfeboro 993 A.2d 184 N.H. 2010
“Courts can neither ignore the plain language of the legislation nor add words which the lawmakers did not see fit to include.” Appeal of Astro Spectacular, 138 N.H. 298, 300 (1994) (quotation omitted).
Hemenway v. Hemenway 992 A.2d 575 N.H. 2010
“Courts can neither ignore the plain language of the legislation nor add words which the lawmakers did not see fit to include.” Appeal of Astro Spectacular, 138 N.H. 298, 300 (1994) (quotation omitted).
Appeal of Garrison Place Real Estate Investment Trust 986 A.2d 670 N.H. 2009
“Courts can neither ignore the plain language of the legislation nor add words which the lawmakers did not see fit to include.” Appeal of Astro Spectacular, 138 N.H. 298, 300 (1994) (quotation omitted).
In Re Stapleford 931 A.2d 1199 N.H. 2007
Appeal of Astro Spectacular, 138 N.H. 298, 300 (1994).
State v. Brown 927 A.2d 493 N.H. 2007
We “can neither ignore the plain language of the legislation nor add words which the lawmakers did not see fit to include.” Appeal of Astro Spectacular, 138 N.H. 298, 300 (1994) (quotation omitted).
State v. Gordon 815 A.2d 379 N.H. 2002
Courts “can neither ignore the plain *684 language of the legislation nor add words which the lawmakers did not see fit to include.” Appeal of Astro Spectacular, 138 N.H. 298, 300 (1994) (quotation omitted).
State v. Hammell 787 A.2d 850 N.H. 2001
We “can neither ignore the plain language of the legislation nor add words which the lawmakers did not see fit to include.” Appeal of Astro Spectacular, 138 N.H. 298, 300 (1994) (quotation omitted).
Hammell v. Warden 776 A.2d 740 N.H. 2001
We look first to the “language found in the statute and where possible, we ascribe the plain and ordinary meanings to words used.” Appeal of Astro Spectacular, 138 N.H. 298, 300 (1994) (quotation and citation omitted).
Fichtner v. Pittsley 774 A.2d 1239 N.H. 2001
Appeal of Astro Spectacular, 138 N.H. 298, 300 (1994).
Rayeski v. Gunstock Area 776 A.2d 1265 N.H. 2001
Appeal of Astro Spectacular, 138 N.H. 298, 300 (1994).
Appeal of New Hampshire Department of Transportation 744 A.2d 1128 N.H. 1999
“When construing the meaning of a statute, we first examine the language found in the statute, and where possible, we ascribe the plain and ordinary meanings to words used.” Appeal of Astro Spectacular, 138 N.H. 298, 300, 639 A.2d 249, 250 (1994) (quotation and citation omitted).
Bianco Professional Ass'n v. Home Insurance 740 A.2d 1051 N.H. 1999
Appeal of Astro Spectacular, 138 N.H. 298, 300, 639 A.2d 249, 250 (1994).
Petition of Hoyt 727 A.2d 1001 N.H. 1999
Appeal of Astro Spectacular, 138 N.H. 298, 300, 639 A.2d 249, 250 (1994).
Brewster Academy v. Town of Wolfeboro 701 A.2d 1240 N.H. 1997
We will not interpret RSA 72:23, IV to expand its application, as urged by the town, because we “can neither ignore the plain language of the legislature nor add words which the lawmakers did not see fit to include.” Appeal of Astro Spectacular, Inc., 138 N.H. 298, 300, 639 A.2d 249, 250 (1994) (quotation omitted).
Kibbe v. Town of Milton 700 A.2d 1224 N.H. 1997
We look first to the language of the statute, “and where possible, we ascribe the plain and ordinary meanings to words used.” Appeal of Astro Spectacular, 138 N.H. 298, 300, 639 A.2d 249, 250 (1994) (quotation omitted).
Gisonni v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 687 A.2d 709 N.H. 1996
We “look first to the statutory language itself,” Appeal of Richards, 134 N.H. 148, 161, 590 A.2d 586, 594 (1991), and “where possible, we ascribe the plain and ordinary meanings to words used.” Appeal of Astro Spectacular, 138 N.H. 298, 300, 639 A.2d 249, 250 (1994).
South Down Recreation Ass'n v. Moran 686 A.2d 314 N.H. 1996
Appeal of Astro Spectacular, 138 N.H. 298, 300, 639 A.2d 249, 250 (1994).
Union Leader Corp. v. City of Nashua 686 A.2d 310 N.H. 1996
Appeal of Astro Spectacular, 138 N.H. 298, 300, 639 A.2d 249, 250 (1994); Union Leader Corp. v. Fenniman, 136 N.H. 624, 626, 620 A.2d 1039, 1040 (1993).
Milette v. New Hampshire Retirement System 683 A.2d 531 N.H. 1996
“When construing the meaning of a statute, we first examine the language found in the statute, and where possible, we ascribe the plain and ordinary meanings to words used.” Appeal of Astro Spectacular, 138 N.H. 298, 300, 639 A.2d 249, 250 (1994) (quotation and citation omitted).
State v. Bernard 680 A.2d 609 N.H. 1996
Appeal of Astro Spectacular, 138 N.H. 298, 300, 639 A.2d 249, 250 (1994) (quotations, citations, and brackets omitted).
Bohan v. Ritzo 679 A.2d 597 N.H. 1996
“When construing the meaning of a statute, we first examine the language found in the statute, and where possible, we ascribe the plain and ordinary meanings to words used.” Appeal of Astro Spectacular, 138 N.H. 298, 300, 639 A.2d 249, 250 (1994) (quotations and citation omitted).
Appeal of Mascoma Valley Regional School District 677 A.2d 679 N.H. 1996
Appeal of Astro, Spectacular, 138 N.H. 298, 300, 639 A.2d 249, 250 (1994).
Ashland School District v. New Hampshire Division for Children, Yuth, & Families 681 A.2d 71 N.H. 1996
Because we will not add words to a statute that the lawmakers did not see fit to include, see Appeal of Astro Spectacular, 138 N.H. 298, 300, 639 A.2d 249, 250 (1994), we hold that an IEP developed by the school district is not a prerequisite to “special education” in this case.
In re Thomas M. 676 A.2d 113 N.H. 1996
RSA 21:2 (1988); cf. Appeal of Astro Spectacular, 138 N.H. 298, 300, 639 A.2d 249, 250 (1994) (when construing statute’s meaning, court first examines statute’s language, ascribing to words their plain and ordinary meanings where possible).
Appeal of Public Service Co. 676 A.2d 101 N.H. 1996
In construing the meaning of RSA 374:26, “we first examine the language found in the statute, and where possible, we ascribe the plain and ordinary meanings to words used.” Appeal of Astro Spectacular, 138 N.H. 298, 300, 639 A.2d 249, 250 (1994) (citation and quotation omitted).
Roberts v. General Motors Corp. 673 A.2d 779 N.H. 1996
In addition, when construing the meaning of a statute, “where possible, we ascribe the plain and ordinary meanings to words used.” Appeal of Astro Spectacular, 138 N.H. 298, 300, 639 A.2d 249, 250 (1994) (quotation omitted).
Appeal of City of Portsmouth 667 A.2d 345 N.H. 1995
Appeal of Astro Spectacular, 138 N.H. 298, 299, 639 A.2d 249, 250 (1994).
Conrad v. Hazen 665 A.2d 372 N.H. 1995
“When construing the meaning of a statute, we first examine the language found in the statute, and where possible, we ascribe the plain and ordinary meanings to words used.” Appeal of Astro Spectacular, 138 N.H. 298, 300, 639 A.2d 249, 250 (1994) (citation and quotation omitted).
In re Walker 641 A.2d 1021 N.H. 1994
Appeal of Astro Spectacular, Inc., 138 N.H. 298, 300, 639 A.2d 249, 250 (1994).

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by