DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite Opinion of the Justices, 609 A.2d 1204.

14 citing documents.

  • Ball v. Roman Catholic Bishop of Manchester 2025 N.H. 45 N.H. 2025
    Opinion of the Justices (Furlough), 135 N.H. 625, 630 (1992).
  • City of Manchester v. Bellenoit 2024 N.H. 28 N.H. 2024
    Fed’n of Teachers — N.H., 167 N.H. at 300-01; see also Opinion of the Justices (Furlough), 135 N.H. 625, 630 (1992) (“We.
  • American Federation of Teachers – New Hampshire & a. v. State of New Hampshire & a. 167 N.H. 294 N.H. 2015
    understand article I, section 10 [of the Federal Constitution] and part I, article 23 [of the State Constitution] to offer equivalent protections where a law impairs a contract, or where a law abrogates an earlier statute that is itself a contract.” Opinion of the Justices (Furlough), 135 N.H. 625, 630 (1992).
  • Professional Fire Fighters of New Hampshire & a. v. State of New Hampshire & a. 167 N.H. 188 N.H. 2014
    understand article I, section 10 [of the Federal Constitution] and part I, article 23 [of the State Constitution] to offer equivalent protections where a law impairs a contract, or where a law abrogates an earlier statute that is itself a contract.” Opinion of the Justices (Furlough), 135 N.H. 625, 630 (1992).
  • Cloutier v. State 42 A.3d 816 N.H. 2012
    “We therefore understand article I, section 10 [of the Federal Constitution] and part I, article 23 [of the State Constitution] to offer equivalent protections where a law impairs a contract, or where a law abrogates an earlier statute that is itself a contract.” Opinion of the Justices (Furlough), 135 N.H. 625, 630 (1992).
  • State Employees' Ass'n v. State 20 A.3d 961 N.H. 2011
    for the decision of civil causes...” We have previously defined “retrospective law” as “every statute, which takes away or impairs vested rights, acquired under existing laws, or creates a new obligation, imposes a new duty, or attaches a new disability, in respect to transactions or considerations already past.” Opinion of the Justices (Furlough), 135 N.H. 625, 630 (1992) (quotations omitted).
  • Tuttle v. New Hampshire Medical Malpractice Joint Underwriting Ass'n 159 N.H. 627 N.H. 2010
    Opinion of the Justices (Furlough), 135 N.H. 625, 630 (1992).
  • Tuttle v. MED. MAL. JOINT UNDERWRITING 992 A.2d 624 N.H. 2010
    Opinion of the Justices (Furlough), 135 N.H. 625, 630, 609 A.2d 1204 (1992).
  • State v. Fournier 965 A.2d 1091 N.H. 2009
    However, we have held that its proscription “duplicates the protections found in the contract clause of the United States Constitution.” Opinion of the Justices (Furlough), 135 N.H. 625, 630 (1992).
  • In Re Grand Jury Subpoena 926 A.2d 280 N.H. 2007
    A retrospective law is one that “takes away or impairs vested rights, acquired under existing laws, or creates a new obligation, imposes a new duty, or attaches a new disability, in respect to transactions or considerations already past.” Opinion of the Justices (Furlough), 135 N.H. 625, 630 (1992) (quotation and ellipsis omitted).
  • Lower Village Hydroelectric Associates, L.P. v. City of Claremont 782 A.2d 897 N.H. 2001
    Opinion, of the Justices (Furlough), 135 N.H. 625, 630 (1992) (quoting Woart v. Winnick, 3 N.H. 473, 479 (1826)).
  • In re New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission Statewide Electric Utility Restructuring Plan 722 A.2d 483 N.H. 1998
    Opinion of the Justices (Furlough), 135 N.H. 625, 631, 609 A.2d 1204, 1208 (1992).
  • Kibbe v. Town of Milton 700 A.2d 1224 N.H. 1997
    Opinion of the Justices (Furlough), 135 N.H. 625, 634-35, 609 A.2d 1204, 1210 (1992) (noting that courts typically defer to legislative judgment as to necessity and reasonableness of particular measures).
  • State v. Comeau 697 A.2d 497 N.H. 1997
    Opinion of the Justices, 131 N.H. 573, 582, 558 A.2d 454, 459 (1989); see also Opinion of the Justices (Furlough), 135 N.H. 625, 638, 609 A.2d 1204, 1212 (1992).