Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite Masse v. Commercial Union Insurance, 620 A.2d 1041.

15 citing documents.

  • State v. Wells 2026 N.H. 8 N.H. 2026
    Masse v. Commercial Union Ins.
  • In re Estate of Marie G. Dow N.H. 2021
    Co., 136 N.H. 628, 632 (1993); see also, e.g., In re Estate of Treloar, 151 N.H. at 462-64; In re Estate of Came, 129 N.H. 544, 547-50 (1987); In re Estate of MacKay, 121 N.H. at 683-84; cf. In re Craig Living Trust, 171 N.H. at 282, 284 (agreeing with the trustee that RSA 551:10 is “not intended merely to provide guidance relative to
  • State v. Jason Wilbur 197 A.3d 1125 N.H. 2018
    Co., 136 N.H. 628, 631-32 (1993) (“Because the trial judge decided the case on the record and therefore could not have observed the demeanor and credibility of the witnesses, the standard of review should be broadened.” (quotation and brackets omitted)); Commonwealth v. Haley, 604 N.E.2d 682, 684 (Mass. 1992) (“When a motion judge has
  • Signal Aviation Services, Inc. v. City of Lebanon 144 A.3d 869 N.H. 2016
    Co., 136 N.H. 628, 632 (1993) (noting that “RSA 542:8 allows the superior court to alter an arbitrator’s decision only for ‘plain mistake,’ or to vacate it for ‘fraud, corruption, or misconduct’”).
  • Mahindra & Mahindra, Ltd. v. Holloway Motor Cars of Manchester, LLC & a. 166 N.H. 740 N.H. 2014
    Co., 136 N.H. 628, 632 (1993) (“As all the documents.
  • Pawtucket Mutual Insurance v. Hartford Insurance 787 A.2d 870 N.H. 2001
    Masse v. Commercial Union Ins.
  • In re Bill F. 761 A.2d 470 N.H. 2000
    Masse v. Commerial Union Ins.
  • Mountain Valley Mall Associates v. Municipality of Conway 745 A.2d 481 N.H. 2000
    Co., 136 N.H. 628, 632, 620 A.2d 1041, 1044 (1993) (refusing to grant usual deference to superior court in insurance policy coverage dispute), and are not governed by either the statutory framework at issue here or prior relevant case law.
  • Merrill Lynch Futures, Inc. v. Sands 727 A.2d 1009 N.H. 1999
    Co., 136 N.H. 628, 632, 620 A.2d 1041, 1044 (1993) (decision may be against weight of evidence).
  • Appeal of Cote 660 A.2d 1090 N.H. 1995
    Co., 136 N.H. 628, 632, 620 A.2d 1041, 1044 (1993) (less deference given to trial *581 court’s findings derived entirely from submitted documents), and was therefore “free to disregard or accept, in whole or in part,” conflicting expert testimony.
  • True v. Fleet Bank 645 A.2d 671 N.H. 1994
    Co., 136 N.H. 628, 631-32, 620 A.2d 1041, 1044 (1993), the defendant is not entitled to a contrary result as a matter of law.
  • Providence Mutual Fire Insurance v. Scanlon 638 A.2d 1246 N.H. 1994
    Masse v. Commercial Union Ins.
  • Appeal of Dube 636 A.2d 59 N.H. 1993
    Co., 136 N.H. 628, 632, 620 A.2d 1041, 1044 (1993) (broadened standard of review applied when trial judge decided case on the record).
  • McGovern v. Secretary of State 635 A.2d 498 N.H. 1993
    Masse v. Commercial Union Ins.
  • Day v. New Hampshire Retirement System 635 A.2d 493 N.H. 1993
    Masse v. Commercial Union Ins.