DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite Dumont v. Town of Wolfeboro, 622 A.2d 1238.

14 citing documents.

  • Harvey v. Town of Barrington 2024 N.H. 10 N.H. 2024
    Lynn, 169 N.H. at 84; Dumont v. Town of Wolfeboro, 137 N.H. 1, 5 (1993) (“Defining the rights of the parties to an expressly deeded easement requires determining the parties’ intent in light of circumstances at the time the easement was granted.” (emphasis added)).
  • Jillian Cohen Bergeron v. New York Community Bank 168 N.H. 63 N.H. 2015
    Dumont v. Town of Wolfeboro, 137 N.H. 1, 5 (1993) (noting that “[c]lear and unambiguous terms of a deed control how we construe the parties’ intent”); State v. Collyns, 166 N.H. 514, 519 (2014) (noting that “[a]bsent ambiguity, the parties’ intent will be determined from the plain meaning of the language used in the contract” (quotation omitted)).
  • Village Green Condominium Ass'n v. Hodges 114 A.3d 323 N.H. 2015
    Dumont v. Town of Wolfeboro, 137 N.H. 1, 5 (1993).
  • City of Portsmouth v. Boyle 8 A.3d 37 N.H. 2010
    See, e.g., Dumont v. Town of Wolfeboro, 137 N.H. 1, 10-11 (1993) (trial court denial of costs under RSA 677:15, V upheld where no finding of bad faith).
  • Duxbury-Fox v. Shakhnovich 989 A.2d 246 N.H. 2009
    “Defining the rights of the parties to an expressly deeded easement requires determining the parties’ intent in light of circumstances at the time the easement was granted.” Dumont v. Town of Wolfeboro, 137 N.H. 1, 5 (1993).
  • Bio Energy, LLC v. Town of Hopkinton 891 A.2d 509 N.H. 2005
    However, “[e]rroneous board decisions based on mistaken interpretations of valid regulations differ materially from technically precise applications of invalid ordinances; a mistaken board decision does not effect a taking when the erroneous decision resulted from misconstruction of otherwise valid restrictions.” Dumont v. Town of Wolfeboro, 137 N.H. 1, 10 (1993).
  • Arcidi v. Town of Rye 846 A.2d 535 N.H. 2004
    Dumont v. Town of Wolfeboro, 137 N.H. 1, 5 (1993).
  • Torromeo v. Town of Fremont 813 A.2d 389 N.H. 2002
    at 346; see also Dumont v. Town of Wolfeboro, 137 N.H. 1, 10 (1993).
  • Webster v. Town of Candia 778 A.2d 402 N.H. 2001
    While arbitrary or unreasonable restrictions which substantially deprive the owner of the economically viable use of his or her land may constitute a taking, Dumont v. Town of Wolfeboro, 137 N.H. 1, 9 (1993), the “failure to take discretionary affirmative action that would arguably have increased the value of [a landowner’s] property” does not.
  • McKenzie v. City of Berlin 767 A.2d 396 N.H. 2000
    Dumont v. Town of Wolfeboro, 137 N.H. 1, 11, 622 A.2d 1238, 1244 (1993).
  • Gray v. Seidel 726 A.2d 1283 N.H. 1999
    RSA 491:7 (1997); see also Dumont v. Town of Wolfeboro, 137 N.H. 1, 5, 622 A.2d 1238, 1240-41 (1993).
  • Casico, Inc. v. City of Manchester 702 A.2d 302 N.H. 1997
    Dumont v. Town of Wolfeboro, 137 N.H. 1, 11, 622 A.2d 1238, 1244 (1993).
  • Taber v. Town of Westmoreland 670 A.2d 1034 N.H. 1996
    Dumont v. Town of Wolfeboro, 137 N.H. 1, 10, 622 A.2d 1238, 1244 (1993).
  • Flanagan v. Prudhomme 644 A.2d 51 N.H. 1994
    Dumont v. Town of Wolfeboro, 137 N.H. 1, 5, 622 A.2d 1238, 1241 (1993); Thurston Enterprises, Inc. v. Baldi, 128 N.H. 760, 765, 519 A.2d 297, 301 (1986).